{ "items": [ { "capture_risk_score": 53, "category": "foreign_philanthropy_health_agriculture_dependency_watchlist", "class": { "label": "faible contribution ou action contraire \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier", "tone": "red" }, "correction_pathway": "Corrections, counter-evidence, DOI/ISBN/URL links, publication records, ORCID/imported records and reviewer notes can update this profile through the backend. Public pages do not reveal who contributes.", "country": "United States / active in Africa", "entity_id": "ACT-FOREIGN-GATES-AFRICA", "entity_type": "foreign_actor", "evidence_profile": { "actor_id": "ACT-FOREIGN-GATES-AFRICA", "bisalu": { "proofs": [], "summary": "Evaluate tangible outputs: institutions, publications, tools, jobs, infrastructure, laws, companies and local capabilities." }, "critical_flags_uncertainties": [ "adjacence fondations/think tanks \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier", "amplification externe disproportionn\u00e9e", "philanthropie/visibilit\u00e9 peut masquer d\u00e9pendance" ], "nsiku": { "claims": [], "summary": "Evaluate rule, accountability, anti-capture boundaries and discourse-action consistency." }, "nzola": { "claims": [], "summary": "Evaluate protection of people, dignity, education, health, social repair and non-fracture." }, "profile_type": "seed_or_database_profile", "references": [], "score_note": "Impact mat\u00e9riel possible, mais tr\u00e8s fort risque de d\u00e9pendance et agenda-setting externe. Le score doit distinguer service rendu et souverainet\u00e9 transf\u00e9r\u00e9e: qui d\u00e9cide, qui poss\u00e8de, qui maintient, qui contr\u00f4le les donn\u00e9es?", "source_needs": [ "reference documents", "public actions", "financial/funding sources", "right-of-reply where relevant" ], "title": "Bill Gates / Gates Foundation Africa footprint" }, "evidence_strength": 62, "name": "Bill Gates / Gates Foundation Africa footprint", "positive_components": { "A1": 52, "A2": 28, "A3": 46, "A4": 32, "A5": 48, "A6": 12, "A7": 30, "A8": 44, "A9": 60 }, "positive_score": 33, "red_flags": [ "adjacence fondations/think tanks \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier", "amplification externe disproportionn\u00e9e", "philanthropie/visibilit\u00e9 peut masquer d\u00e9pendance" ], "risk_components": { "R1": 86, "R2": 70, "R3": 48, "R4": 62, "R5": 54, "R6": 82, "R7": 74, "R8": 82, "R9": 34 }, "role_label": { "code": "mixed", "label": "Acteur mixte / sous revue" }, "score": 10, "score_explanation": "Impact mat\u00e9riel possible, mais tr\u00e8s fort risque de d\u00e9pendance et agenda-setting externe. Le score doit distinguer service rendu et souverainet\u00e9 transf\u00e9r\u00e9e: qui d\u00e9cide, qui poss\u00e8de, qui maintient, qui contr\u00f4le les donn\u00e9es?", "search_keywords": [ "Bill Gates", "Gates Foundation", "Africa", "health", "agriculture", "philanthropy laundering", "dependency" ], "source": "seed", "status": "foreign_actor_high_dependency_review_required", "summary": "Acteur non africain tr\u00e8s actif en sant\u00e9, agriculture, vaccins et politiques publiques africaines; \u00e0 \u00e9valuer par transfert de capacit\u00e9s ou d\u00e9pendance technocratique, influence de priorit\u00e9s et contr\u00f4le des donn\u00e9es/syst\u00e8mes.", "visibility": "public" }, { "capture_risk_score": 47, "category": "present_leadership_dependency_and_security_watchlist", "class": { "label": "faible contribution ou action contraire \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier", "tone": "red" }, "correction_pathway": "Corrections, counter-evidence, DOI/ISBN/URL links, publication records, ORCID/imported records and reviewer notes can update this profile through the backend. Public pages do not reveal who contributes.", "country": "Kenya", "entity_id": "ACT-LEADER-WILLIAM-RUTO-APPARATUS", "entity_type": "political_apparatus", "evidence_profile": { "actor_id": "ACT-LEADER-WILLIAM-RUTO-APPARATUS", "bisalu": { "proofs": [], "summary": "Evaluate tangible outputs: institutions, publications, tools, jobs, infrastructure, laws, companies and local capabilities." }, "critical_flags_uncertainties": [ "contradiction discours-actions" ], "nsiku": { "claims": [], "summary": "Evaluate rule, accountability, anti-capture boundaries and discourse-action consistency." }, "nzola": { "claims": [], "summary": "Evaluate protection of people, dignity, education, health, social repair and non-fracture." }, "profile_type": "seed_or_database_profile", "references": [], "score_note": "Profil sensible: les scores doivent \u00eatre document\u00e9s par budgets, accords militaires, clauses d'immunit\u00e9, sant\u00e9 publique, dette et donn\u00e9es. Critique des patterns, non jugement personnel priv\u00e9.", "source_needs": [ "reference documents", "public actions", "financial/funding sources", "right-of-reply where relevant" ], "title": "William Ruto / Kenya governance apparatus" }, "evidence_strength": 58, "name": "William Ruto / Kenya governance apparatus", "positive_components": { "A1": 44, "A2": 32, "A3": 42, "A4": 34, "A5": 38, "A6": 24, "A7": 30, "A8": 42, "A9": 50 }, "positive_score": 32, "red_flags": [ "contradiction discours-actions" ], "risk_components": { "R1": 76, "R2": 58, "R3": 60, "R4": 62, "R5": 56, "R6": 68, "R7": 54, "R8": 48, "R9": 42 }, "role_label": { "code": "mixed", "label": "Acteur mixte / sous revue" }, "score": 10, "score_explanation": "Profil sensible: les scores doivent \u00eatre document\u00e9s par budgets, accords militaires, clauses d'immunit\u00e9, sant\u00e9 publique, dette et donn\u00e9es. Critique des patterns, non jugement personnel priv\u00e9.", "search_keywords": [ "William Ruto", "Kenya", "debt", "French troops", "foreign immunity", "health", "data" ], "source": "seed", "status": "present_governance_right_of_reply_required", "summary": "Profil de gouvernance \u00e0 \u00e9valuer sur dette, s\u00e9curit\u00e9, troupes \u00e9trang\u00e8res, sant\u00e9 publique, data/digitalisation, imp\u00f4ts et protection effective du peuple.", "visibility": "public" }, { "capture_risk_score": 51, "category": "foreign_tech_platform_dependency_watchlist", "class": { "label": "faible contribution ou action contraire \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier", "tone": "red" }, "correction_pathway": "Corrections, counter-evidence, DOI/ISBN/URL links, publication records, ORCID/imported records and reviewer notes can update this profile through the backend. Public pages do not reveal who contributes.", "country": "South Africa / United States / Africa footprint", "entity_id": "ACT-FOREIGN-MUSK-AFRICA", "entity_type": "foreign_actor", "evidence_profile": { "actor_id": "ACT-FOREIGN-MUSK-AFRICA", "bisalu": { "proofs": [], "summary": "Evaluate tangible outputs: institutions, publications, tools, jobs, infrastructure, laws, companies and local capabilities." }, "critical_flags_uncertainties": [ "amplification externe disproportionn\u00e9e", "philanthropie/visibilit\u00e9 peut masquer d\u00e9pendance", "contradiction discours-actions" ], "nsiku": { "claims": [], "summary": "Evaluate rule, accountability, anti-capture boundaries and discourse-action consistency." }, "nzola": { "claims": [], "summary": "Evaluate protection of people, dignity, education, health, social repair and non-fracture." }, "profile_type": "seed_or_database_profile", "references": [], "score_note": "La connectivit\u00e9 peut \u00eatre utile, mais la souverainet\u00e9 exige contr\u00f4le africain des donn\u00e9es, infrastructures, standards, mod\u00e9ration, taxation, maintenance et sortie. Forte amplification/personnalisation = risque \u00e0 suivre.", "source_needs": [ "reference documents", "public actions", "financial/funding sources", "right-of-reply where relevant" ], "title": "Elon Musk / platform, satellite and tech influence in Africa" }, "evidence_strength": 54, "name": "Elon Musk / platform, satellite and tech influence in Africa", "positive_components": { "A1": 48, "A2": 22, "A3": 44, "A4": 26, "A5": 42, "A6": 8, "A7": 24, "A8": 36, "A9": 52 }, "positive_score": 29, "red_flags": [ "amplification externe disproportionn\u00e9e", "philanthropie/visibilit\u00e9 peut masquer d\u00e9pendance", "contradiction discours-actions" ], "risk_components": { "R1": 82, "R2": 72, "R3": 60, "R4": 64, "R5": 46, "R6": 60, "R7": 86, "R8": 66, "R9": 58 }, "role_label": { "code": "mixed", "label": "Acteur mixte / sous revue" }, "score": 6, "score_explanation": "La connectivit\u00e9 peut \u00eatre utile, mais la souverainet\u00e9 exige contr\u00f4le africain des donn\u00e9es, infrastructures, standards, mod\u00e9ration, taxation, maintenance et sortie. Forte amplification/personnalisation = risque \u00e0 suivre.", "search_keywords": [ "Elon Musk", "Starlink", "X", "Africa", "platform", "satellite", "data sovereignty", "dependency" ], "source": "seed", "status": "foreign_tech_dependency_and_information_risk_review", "summary": "Acteur tech global \u00e0 \u00e9valuer par connectivit\u00e9, plateformes, donn\u00e9es, d\u00e9pendance infrastructurelle, discours public, influence informationnelle et contr\u00f4le non africain des couches critiques.", "visibility": "public" }, { "capture_risk_score": 70, "category": "dependency_watchlist_affiliation_local_footprint_review", "class": { "label": "faible contribution ou action contraire \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier", "tone": "red" }, "correction_pathway": "Corrections, counter-evidence, DOI/ISBN/URL links, publication records, ORCID/imported records and reviewer notes can update this profile through the backend. Public pages do not reveal who contributes.", "country": "S\u00e9n\u00e9gal / diaspora / plateformes externes", "entity_id": "ACT-BUSINESS-MAGATTE-WADE", "entity_type": "business", "evidence_profile": { "actor_id": "ACT-BUSINESS-MAGATTE-WADE", "bisalu": { "proofs": [], "summary": "Evaluate tangible outputs: institutions, publications, tools, jobs, infrastructure, laws, companies and local capabilities." }, "critical_flags_uncertainties": [ "adjacence fondations/think tanks \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier", "amplification externe disproportionn\u00e9e", "philanthropie/visibilit\u00e9 peut masquer d\u00e9pendance", "contradiction discours-actions" ], "nsiku": { "claims": [], "summary": "Evaluate rule, accountability, anti-capture boundaries and discourse-action consistency." }, "nzola": { "claims": [], "summary": "Evaluate protection of people, dignity, education, health, social repair and non-fracture." }, "profile_type": "seed_or_database_profile", "references": [], "score_note": "Very low contribution score until verifiable local footprint, capability transfer and funding/amplification structure are documented. Red flags are not guilt; they are evidence requirements.", "source_needs": [ "reference documents", "public actions", "financial/funding sources", "right-of-reply where relevant" ], "title": "Magatte Wade / prosperity-media business profile" }, "evidence_strength": 48, "name": "Magatte Wade / prosperity-media business profile", "positive_components": { "A1": 25, "A10": 10, "A2": 22, "A3": 18, "A4": 20, "A5": 18, "A6": 20, "A7": 15, "A8": 20, "A9": 48 }, "positive_score": 20, "red_flags": [ "adjacence fondations/think tanks \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier", "amplification externe disproportionn\u00e9e", "philanthropie/visibilit\u00e9 peut masquer d\u00e9pendance", "contradiction discours-actions" ], "risk_components": { "R1": 78, "R10": 44, "R11": 66, "R2": 84, "R3": 76, "R4": 62, "R5": 54, "R6": 88, "R7": 92, "R8": 84, "R9": 50 }, "role_label": { "code": "dependency_vector", "label": "Vecteur de d\u00e9pendance \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier" }, "score": 0, "score_explanation": "Very low contribution score until verifiable local footprint, capability transfer and funding/amplification structure are documented. Red flags are not guilt; they are evidence requirements.", "search_keywords": [ "Magatte Wade", "Heritage", "NED", "prosperity", "business footprint", "Senegal", "amplification", "think tank" ], "source": "seed", "status": "evidence_gated_watchlist_affiliation_and_local_footprint_required", "summary": "Evidence-gated profile: high external amplification and prosperity-media positioning must be tested against verifiable local business footprint, jobs, productive assets, ownership transfer and funding/think-tank adjacency.", "visibility": "public" }, { "capture_risk_score": 54, "category": "extractive_capital_philanthropy_watchlist", "class": { "label": "faible contribution ou action contraire \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier", "tone": "red" }, "correction_pathway": "Corrections, counter-evidence, DOI/ISBN/URL links, publication records, ORCID/imported records and reviewer notes can update this profile through the backend. Public pages do not reveal who contributes.", "country": "South Africa / global extractive networks", "entity_id": "ACT-FOREIGN-OPPENHEIMER-NETWORKS", "entity_type": "foreign_actor", "evidence_profile": { "actor_id": "ACT-FOREIGN-OPPENHEIMER-NETWORKS", "bisalu": { "proofs": [], "summary": "Evaluate tangible outputs: institutions, publications, tools, jobs, infrastructure, laws, companies and local capabilities." }, "critical_flags_uncertainties": [ "philanthropie/visibilit\u00e9 peut masquer d\u00e9pendance", "effet n\u00e9gatif sur capacit\u00e9s populaires" ], "nsiku": { "claims": [], "summary": "Evaluate rule, accountability, anti-capture boundaries and discourse-action consistency." }, "nzola": { "claims": [], "summary": "Evaluate protection of people, dignity, education, health, social repair and non-fracture." }, "profile_type": "seed_or_database_profile", "references": [], "score_note": "Profil de risque \u00e9lev\u00e9 si les preuves confirment extraction, rente et influence sans transfert de propri\u00e9t\u00e9/capacit\u00e9s. Toute philanthropie doit \u00eatre \u00e9valu\u00e9e contre extraction, r\u00e9paration et contr\u00f4le local.", "source_needs": [ "reference documents", "public actions", "financial/funding sources", "right-of-reply where relevant" ], "title": "Oppenheimer-linked extractive and philanthropy networks" }, "evidence_strength": 55, "name": "Oppenheimer-linked extractive and philanthropy networks", "positive_components": { "A1": 30, "A2": 18, "A3": 28, "A4": 22, "A5": 26, "A6": 12, "A7": 20, "A8": 24, "A9": 40 }, "positive_score": 21, "red_flags": [ "philanthropie/visibilit\u00e9 peut masquer d\u00e9pendance", "effet n\u00e9gatif sur capacit\u00e9s populaires" ], "risk_components": { "R1": 78, "R2": 66, "R3": 55, "R4": 88, "R5": 70, "R6": 65, "R7": 50, "R8": 78, "R9": 32 }, "role_label": { "code": "mixed", "label": "Acteur mixte / sous revue" }, "score": 0, "score_explanation": "Profil de risque \u00e9lev\u00e9 si les preuves confirment extraction, rente et influence sans transfert de propri\u00e9t\u00e9/capacit\u00e9s. Toute philanthropie doit \u00eatre \u00e9valu\u00e9e contre extraction, r\u00e9paration et contr\u00f4le local.", "search_keywords": [ "Oppenheimer", "mining", "extractive", "philanthropy", "South Africa", "diamond", "dependency risk" ], "source": "seed", "status": "extractive_network_evidence_needed", "summary": "R\u00e9seaux de capital extractif et philanthropie \u00e0 \u00e9valuer par extraction historique, propri\u00e9t\u00e9, influence politique, restitution, transparence, r\u00e9paration et contribution r\u00e9elle \u00e0 capacit\u00e9s africaines.", "visibility": "public" }, { "capture_risk_score": 61, "category": "foreign_policy_thinktank_dependency_pattern", "class": { "label": "faible contribution ou action contraire \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier", "tone": "red" }, "correction_pathway": "Corrections, counter-evidence, DOI/ISBN/URL links, publication records, ORCID/imported records and reviewer notes can update this profile through the backend. Public pages do not reveal who contributes.", "country": "United States / global Africa influence", "entity_id": "ACT-THINKTANK-HERITAGE-NED-ADJACENCY", "entity_type": "think_tank", "evidence_profile": { "actor_id": "ACT-THINKTANK-HERITAGE-NED-ADJACENCY", "bisalu": { "proofs": [], "summary": "Evaluate tangible outputs: institutions, publications, tools, jobs, infrastructure, laws, companies and local capabilities." }, "critical_flags_uncertainties": [ "adjacence fondations/think tanks \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier", "amplification externe disproportionn\u00e9e", "philanthropie/visibilit\u00e9 peut masquer d\u00e9pendance", "effet n\u00e9gatif sur capacit\u00e9s populaires" ], "nsiku": { "claims": [], "summary": "Evaluate rule, accountability, anti-capture boundaries and discourse-action consistency." }, "nzola": { "claims": [], "summary": "Evaluate protection of people, dignity, education, health, social repair and non-fracture." }, "profile_type": "seed_or_database_profile", "references": [], "score_note": "Tr\u00e8s haut risque comme pattern si les preuves montrent agenda externalis\u00e9, d\u00e9pendance, fragmentation ou capture narrative. L'adjacence seule d\u00e9clenche enqu\u00eate; elle ne suffit pas comme verdict final.", "source_needs": [ "reference documents", "public actions", "financial/funding sources", "right-of-reply where relevant" ], "title": "Heritage / NED-adjacent influence pattern" }, "evidence_strength": 52, "name": "Heritage / NED-adjacent influence pattern", "positive_components": { "A1": 12, "A2": 8, "A3": 20, "A4": 8, "A5": 12, "A6": 4, "A7": 18, "A8": 12, "A9": 60 }, "positive_score": 13, "red_flags": [ "adjacence fondations/think tanks \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier", "amplification externe disproportionn\u00e9e", "philanthropie/visibilit\u00e9 peut masquer d\u00e9pendance", "effet n\u00e9gatif sur capacit\u00e9s populaires" ], "risk_components": { "R1": 90, "R2": 72, "R3": 56, "R4": 70, "R5": 72, "R6": 95, "R7": 82, "R8": 76, "R9": 80 }, "role_label": { "code": "mixed", "label": "Acteur mixte / sous revue" }, "score": 0, "score_explanation": "Tr\u00e8s haut risque comme pattern si les preuves montrent agenda externalis\u00e9, d\u00e9pendance, fragmentation ou capture narrative. L'adjacence seule d\u00e9clenche enqu\u00eate; elle ne suffit pas comme verdict final.", "search_keywords": [ "Heritage", "NED", "think tank", "foundation", "dependency", "foreign influence", "amplification", "fracture" ], "source": "seed", "status": "pattern_module_evidence_required_not_personal_verdict", "summary": "Module-type pour scorer les acteurs, auteurs, fondations ou m\u00e9dias reli\u00e9s \u00e0 r\u00e9seaux d'influence externes. Il ne condamne pas par association; il exige preuves de financement, co-publication, agenda, amplification et effets sur d\u00e9pendance/fracture.", "visibility": "public" }, { "capture_risk_score": 51, "category": "fracture_threat_watchlist", "class": { "label": "faible contribution ou action contraire \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier", "tone": "red" }, "correction_pathway": "Corrections, counter-evidence, DOI/ISBN/URL links, publication records, ORCID/imported records and reviewer notes can update this profile through the backend. Public pages do not reveal who contributes.", "country": "Afrique du Sud", "entity_id": "ACT-ZA-OPERATION-DUDULA-PATTERN", "entity_type": "civil_society", "evidence_profile": { "actor_id": "ACT-ZA-OPERATION-DUDULA-PATTERN", "bisalu": { "proofs": [ { "status": "source required", "title": "community protection or harm evidence", "type": "impact" } ], "summary": "Score requires evidence of constructive capacity-building; mere disruption or scapegoating scores low." }, "critical_flags_uncertainties": [ "Right of reply remains available; profile evaluates pattern effects, not private identity." ], "nsiku": { "claims": [ "Vigilante or exclusionary action triggers high anti-Nsiku risk." ], "summary": "Test whether action respects rule, due process and equal protection or replaces law with intimidation." }, "nzola": { "claims": [ "Anti-migrant mobilization can redirect legitimate economic anger toward vulnerable groups." ], "summary": "Measures harm to migrants, vulnerable people, families and pan-African social cohesion." }, "profile_type": "threat_pattern", "references": [], "score_note": "Fracture risk is severe because it weakens Nzola, Kintuadi and pan-African protection.", "source_needs": [ "public statements", "incident reports", "court or police records", "community testimony", "media reports" ], "title": "Operation Dudula / anti-migrant fracture pattern" }, "evidence_strength": 55, "name": "Operation Dudula / anti-migrant fracture pattern", "positive_components": { "A1": 5, "A10": 0, "A2": 4, "A3": 8, "A4": 4, "A5": 4, "A6": 2, "A7": 6, "A8": 2, "A9": 40 }, "positive_score": 6, "red_flags": [ "contradiction discours-actions", "effet n\u00e9gatif sur capacit\u00e9s populaires", "affaiblissement des protections populaires" ], "risk_components": { "R1": 20, "R10": 95, "R11": 30, "R2": 30, "R3": 60, "R4": 46, "R5": 92, "R6": 20, "R7": 48, "R8": 30, "R9": 98 }, "role_label": { "code": "mixed", "label": "Acteur mixte / sous revue" }, "score": 0, "score_explanation": "Tr\u00e8s haut risque de fracture: le score porte sur le pattern et ses effets mesurables sur protection, coh\u00e9sion et souverainet\u00e9 panafricaine, non sur une appartenance personnelle.", "search_keywords": [ "Operation Dudula", "Afrique du Sud", "migrants", "fracture", "x\u00e9nophobie", "Nzola" ], "source": "seed", "status": "fracture_risk_evidence_gated", "summary": "Pattern de mobilisation anti-migrants \u00e0 haut risque de fracture sociale, affaiblissement de Nzola, diversion de la col\u00e8re populaire et destruction de solidarit\u00e9 panafricaine.", "visibility": "public" }, { "capture_risk_score": 74, "category": "foreign_military_immunity_abuse_risk", "class": { "label": "faible contribution ou action contraire \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier", "tone": "red" }, "correction_pathway": "Corrections, counter-evidence, DOI/ISBN/URL links, publication records, ORCID/imported records and reviewer notes can update this profile through the backend. Public pages do not reveal who contributes.", "country": "France / Afrique", "entity_id": "ACT-FOREIGN-FRENCH-MILITARY-AFRICA", "entity_type": "foreign_actor", "evidence_profile": { "actor_id": "ACT-FOREIGN-FRENCH-MILITARY-AFRICA", "bisalu": { "proofs": [ { "status": "country-specific source required", "title": "SOFA/immunity clauses", "type": "agreement" }, { "status": "source-gated", "title": "abuse or misconduct dossier", "type": "case" } ], "summary": "Measure whether training and operations build autonomous African command, intelligence, maintenance and doctrine or deepen dependency." }, "critical_flags_uncertainties": [ "Do not generalize a specific case to all troops without linked evidence.", "Every country agreement needs its own clause extraction." ], "nsiku": { "claims": [ "Assess jurisdiction clauses, immunity scope, evidence access, parliamentary scrutiny and termination rights." ], "summary": "Risk to sovereign jurisdiction when foreign troops receive broad immunity or local courts lack effective recourse." }, "nzola": { "claims": [ "Assess abuse allegations, victim redress, complaint mechanisms, gender/child protection and independent investigation access." ], "summary": "Risk to civilian protection when foreign deployments operate with weak remedy channels for communities." }, "profile_type": "threat_pattern", "references": [], "score_note": "Threat score rises when immunity, lack of local recourse, dependency and abuse allegations are documented in specific agreements or cases.", "source_needs": [ "SOFA agreement", "parliamentary record", "court files", "human-rights reports", "victim-safe testimony" ], "title": "French military footprint in Africa / immunity and abuse-risk pattern" }, "evidence_strength": 60, "name": "French military footprint in Africa / immunity and abuse-risk pattern", "positive_components": { "A1": 8, "A10": 0, "A2": 4, "A3": 12, "A4": 4, "A5": 10, "A6": 2, "A7": 8, "A8": 4, "A9": 60 }, "positive_score": 9, "red_flags": [ "adjacence fondations/think tanks \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier", "contradiction discours-actions", "effet n\u00e9gatif sur capacit\u00e9s populaires", "affaiblissement des protections populaires", "d\u00e9pendance strat\u00e9gique renforc\u00e9e" ], "risk_components": { "R1": 95, "R10": 88, "R11": 94, "R2": 50, "R3": 62, "R4": 76, "R5": 78, "R6": 70, "R7": 60, "R8": 52, "R9": 70 }, "role_label": { "code": "dependency_vector", "label": "Vecteur de d\u00e9pendance \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier" }, "score": 0, "score_explanation": "Risque s\u00e9v\u00e8re quand des clauses d'immunit\u00e9, op\u00e9rations opaques ou d\u00e9pendances militaires limitent le recours des populations et l'autonomie s\u00e9curitaire. Les accusations sp\u00e9cifiques exigent pi\u00e8ces et droit de r\u00e9ponse.", "search_keywords": [ "French army", "France", "military immunity", "Africa", "foreign troops", "abuse risk", "security dependency" ], "source": "seed", "status": "foreign_military_dossier_sources_required", "summary": "Profil de risque pour accords militaires, immunit\u00e9s, absence de recours local, op\u00e9rations antiterroristes, abus document\u00e9s/all\u00e9gu\u00e9s et d\u00e9pendance s\u00e9curitaire.", "visibility": "public" }, { "capture_risk_score": 71, "category": "foreign_military_counterterror_dependency_risk", "class": { "label": "faible contribution ou action contraire \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier", "tone": "red" }, "correction_pathway": "Corrections, counter-evidence, DOI/ISBN/URL links, publication records, ORCID/imported records and reviewer notes can update this profile through the backend. Public pages do not reveal who contributes.", "country": "United States / Afrique", "entity_id": "ACT-FOREIGN-US-MILITARY-AFRICA", "entity_type": "foreign_actor", "evidence_profile": { "actor_id": "ACT-FOREIGN-US-MILITARY-AFRICA", "bisalu": { "proofs": [], "summary": "Evaluate tangible outputs: institutions, publications, tools, jobs, infrastructure, laws, companies and local capabilities." }, "critical_flags_uncertainties": [ "adjacence fondations/think tanks \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier", "effet n\u00e9gatif sur capacit\u00e9s populaires", "affaiblissement des protections populaires", "d\u00e9pendance strat\u00e9gique renforc\u00e9e" ], "nsiku": { "claims": [], "summary": "Evaluate rule, accountability, anti-capture boundaries and discourse-action consistency." }, "nzola": { "claims": [], "summary": "Evaluate protection of people, dignity, education, health, social repair and non-fracture." }, "profile_type": "seed_or_database_profile", "references": [], "score_note": "Toute assistance s\u00e9curitaire doit \u00eatre test\u00e9e contre autonomie r\u00e9elle: commandement, renseignement, maintenance, donn\u00e9es, sortie, recours civil et transfert de capacit\u00e9s.", "source_needs": [ "reference documents", "public actions", "financial/funding sources", "right-of-reply where relevant" ], "title": "US military / AFRICOM footprint in Africa" }, "evidence_strength": 62, "name": "US military / AFRICOM footprint in Africa", "positive_components": { "A1": 14, "A10": 0, "A2": 8, "A3": 18, "A4": 10, "A5": 14, "A6": 2, "A7": 12, "A8": 8, "A9": 62 }, "positive_score": 12, "red_flags": [ "adjacence fondations/think tanks \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier", "effet n\u00e9gatif sur capacit\u00e9s populaires", "affaiblissement des protections populaires", "d\u00e9pendance strat\u00e9gique renforc\u00e9e" ], "risk_components": { "R1": 90, "R10": 72, "R11": 92, "R2": 55, "R3": 58, "R4": 72, "R5": 62, "R6": 78, "R7": 66, "R8": 60, "R9": 62 }, "role_label": { "code": "dependency_vector", "label": "Vecteur de d\u00e9pendance \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier" }, "score": 0, "score_explanation": "Toute assistance s\u00e9curitaire doit \u00eatre test\u00e9e contre autonomie r\u00e9elle: commandement, renseignement, maintenance, donn\u00e9es, sortie, recours civil et transfert de capacit\u00e9s.", "search_keywords": [ "AFRICOM", "US military", "Africa", "counterterrorism", "drone", "base", "security dependency" ], "source": "seed", "status": "foreign_military_dossier_sources_required", "summary": "Profil de risque pour bases, op\u00e9rations antiterroristes, drone/data dependency, immunit\u00e9s, formation conditionn\u00e9e et externalisation de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 africaine.", "visibility": "public" }, { "capture_risk_score": 65, "category": "foreign_military_training_abuse_risk", "class": { "label": "faible contribution ou action contraire \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier", "tone": "red" }, "correction_pathway": "Corrections, counter-evidence, DOI/ISBN/URL links, publication records, ORCID/imported records and reviewer notes can update this profile through the backend. Public pages do not reveal who contributes.", "country": "United Kingdom / Afrique", "entity_id": "ACT-FOREIGN-BRITISH-MILITARY-AFRICA", "entity_type": "foreign_actor", "evidence_profile": { "actor_id": "ACT-FOREIGN-BRITISH-MILITARY-AFRICA", "bisalu": { "proofs": [], "summary": "Evaluate tangible outputs: institutions, publications, tools, jobs, infrastructure, laws, companies and local capabilities." }, "critical_flags_uncertainties": [ "effet n\u00e9gatif sur capacit\u00e9s populaires", "affaiblissement des protections populaires", "d\u00e9pendance strat\u00e9gique renforc\u00e9e" ], "nsiku": { "claims": [], "summary": "Evaluate rule, accountability, anti-capture boundaries and discourse-action consistency." }, "nzola": { "claims": [], "summary": "Evaluate protection of people, dignity, education, health, social repair and non-fracture." }, "profile_type": "seed_or_database_profile", "references": [], "score_note": "Le risque vient des immunit\u00e9s, de l'opacit\u00e9, de l'impossibilit\u00e9 de recours local et du remplacement de capacit\u00e9s africaines par des d\u00e9pendances ext\u00e9rieures.", "source_needs": [ "reference documents", "public actions", "financial/funding sources", "right-of-reply where relevant" ], "title": "British military / training footprint in Africa" }, "evidence_strength": 58, "name": "British military / training footprint in Africa", "positive_components": { "A1": 10, "A10": 0, "A2": 6, "A3": 12, "A4": 8, "A5": 12, "A6": 2, "A7": 10, "A8": 6, "A9": 58 }, "positive_score": 10, "red_flags": [ "effet n\u00e9gatif sur capacit\u00e9s populaires", "affaiblissement des protections populaires", "d\u00e9pendance strat\u00e9gique renforc\u00e9e" ], "risk_components": { "R1": 82, "R10": 80, "R11": 82, "R2": 46, "R3": 52, "R4": 68, "R5": 70, "R6": 58, "R7": 52, "R8": 48, "R9": 58 }, "role_label": { "code": "mixed", "label": "Acteur mixte / sous revue" }, "score": 0, "score_explanation": "Le risque vient des immunit\u00e9s, de l'opacit\u00e9, de l'impossibilit\u00e9 de recours local et du remplacement de capacit\u00e9s africaines par des d\u00e9pendances ext\u00e9rieures.", "search_keywords": [ "British military", "UK", "Africa", "training", "immunity", "abuse risk", "security dependency" ], "source": "seed", "status": "foreign_military_dossier_sources_required", "summary": "Profil de risque pour entra\u00eenement militaire, immunit\u00e9s, abus all\u00e9gu\u00e9s/document\u00e9s, recours local et externalisation des capacit\u00e9s de d\u00e9fense.", "visibility": "public" }, { "capture_risk_score": 77, "category": "business_industry_dependency_review", "class": { "label": "risque \u00e9lev\u00e9 de capture / contradiction", "tone": "red" }, "correction_pathway": "Corrections, counter-evidence, DOI/ISBN/URL links, publication records, ORCID/imported records and reviewer notes can update this profile through the backend. Public pages do not reveal who contributes.", "country": "France / Afrique", "entity_id": "ACT-BIZ-ORANGE-AFRICA", "entity_type": "foreign_actor", "evidence_profile": { "actor_id": "ACT-BIZ-ORANGE-AFRICA", "bisalu": { "proofs": [], "summary": "Evaluate tangible outputs: institutions, publications, tools, jobs, infrastructure, laws, companies and local capabilities." }, "critical_flags_uncertainties": [ "adjacence fondations/think tanks \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier", "philanthropie/visibilit\u00e9 peut masquer d\u00e9pendance", "contradiction discours-actions", "effet n\u00e9gatif sur capacit\u00e9s populaires", "affaiblissement des protections populaires", "d\u00e9pendance strat\u00e9gique renforc\u00e9e" ], "nsiku": { "claims": [], "summary": "Evaluate rule, accountability, anti-capture boundaries and discourse-action consistency." }, "nzola": { "claims": [], "summary": "Evaluate protection of people, dignity, education, health, social repair and non-fracture." }, "profile_type": "seed_or_database_profile", "references": [], "score_note": "Starter profile. Ranking must move through evidence upload, ORCID/imported records, verified public actions and reviewer approval; not through popularity or pressure.", "source_needs": [ "reference documents", "public actions", "financial/funding sources", "right-of-reply where relevant" ], "title": "Orange Africa telecom/data footprint" }, "evidence_strength": 70, "name": "Orange Africa telecom/data footprint", "positive_components": { "A1": 0, "A10": 0, "A2": 0, "A3": 0, "A4": 0, "A5": 1, "A6": 1, "A7": 0, "A8": 0, "A9": 70 }, "positive_score": 4, "red_flags": [ "adjacence fondations/think tanks \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier", "philanthropie/visibilit\u00e9 peut masquer d\u00e9pendance", "contradiction discours-actions", "effet n\u00e9gatif sur capacit\u00e9s populaires", "affaiblissement des protections populaires", "d\u00e9pendance strat\u00e9gique renforc\u00e9e" ], "risk_components": { "R1": 82, "R10": 77, "R11": 82, "R2": 72, "R3": 72, "R4": 82, "R5": 82, "R6": 77, "R7": 67, "R8": 72, "R9": 77 }, "role_label": { "code": "dependency_vector", "label": "Vecteur de d\u00e9pendance \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier" }, "score": 0, "score_explanation": "Starter profile. Ranking must move through evidence upload, ORCID/imported records, verified public actions and reviewer approval; not through popularity or pressure.", "search_keywords": [ "Orange Africa telecom/data footprint", "France / Afrique", "business_industry_dependency_review", "threat" ], "source": "seed", "status": "prepublication_sources_needed", "summary": "Starter evidence-gated profile for Orange Africa telecom/data footprint. Scores are provisional until source-linked documents, ORCID/OpenAlex records, public actions and right-of-reply status are attached.", "visibility": "public" }, { "capture_risk_score": 81, "category": "business_industry_dependency_review", "class": { "label": "risque \u00e9lev\u00e9 de capture / contradiction", "tone": "red" }, "correction_pathway": "Corrections, counter-evidence, DOI/ISBN/URL links, publication records, ORCID/imported records and reviewer notes can update this profile through the backend. Public pages do not reveal who contributes.", "country": "France / Afrique", "entity_id": "ACT-BIZ-TOTALENERGIES-AFRICA", "entity_type": "foreign_actor", "evidence_profile": { "actor_id": "ACT-BIZ-TOTALENERGIES-AFRICA", "bisalu": { "proofs": [], "summary": "Evaluate tangible outputs: institutions, publications, tools, jobs, infrastructure, laws, companies and local capabilities." }, "critical_flags_uncertainties": [ "adjacence fondations/think tanks \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier", "amplification externe disproportionn\u00e9e", "philanthropie/visibilit\u00e9 peut masquer d\u00e9pendance", "contradiction discours-actions", "effet n\u00e9gatif sur capacit\u00e9s populaires", "affaiblissement des protections populaires", "d\u00e9pendance strat\u00e9gique renforc\u00e9e" ], "nsiku": { "claims": [], "summary": "Evaluate rule, accountability, anti-capture boundaries and discourse-action consistency." }, "nzola": { "claims": [], "summary": "Evaluate protection of people, dignity, education, health, social repair and non-fracture." }, "profile_type": "seed_or_database_profile", "references": [], "score_note": "Starter profile. Ranking must move through evidence upload, ORCID/imported records, verified public actions and reviewer approval; not through popularity or pressure.", "source_needs": [ "reference documents", "public actions", "financial/funding sources", "right-of-reply where relevant" ], "title": "TotalEnergies Africa energy footprint" }, "evidence_strength": 74, "name": "TotalEnergies Africa energy footprint", "positive_components": { "A1": 0, "A10": 0, "A2": 0, "A3": 0, "A4": 0, "A5": 1, "A6": 1, "A7": 0, "A8": 0, "A9": 74 }, "positive_score": 4, "red_flags": [ "adjacence fondations/think tanks \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier", "amplification externe disproportionn\u00e9e", "philanthropie/visibilit\u00e9 peut masquer d\u00e9pendance", "contradiction discours-actions", "effet n\u00e9gatif sur capacit\u00e9s populaires", "affaiblissement des protections populaires", "d\u00e9pendance strat\u00e9gique renforc\u00e9e" ], "risk_components": { "R1": 86, "R10": 81, "R11": 86, "R2": 76, "R3": 76, "R4": 86, "R5": 86, "R6": 81, "R7": 71, "R8": 76, "R9": 81 }, "role_label": { "code": "dependency_vector", "label": "Vecteur de d\u00e9pendance \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier" }, "score": 0, "score_explanation": "Starter profile. Ranking must move through evidence upload, ORCID/imported records, verified public actions and reviewer approval; not through popularity or pressure.", "search_keywords": [ "TotalEnergies Africa energy footprint", "France / Afrique", "business_industry_dependency_review", "threat" ], "source": "seed", "status": "prepublication_sources_needed", "summary": "Starter evidence-gated profile for TotalEnergies Africa energy footprint. Scores are provisional until source-linked documents, ORCID/OpenAlex records, public actions and right-of-reply status are attached.", "visibility": "public" }, { "capture_risk_score": 65, "category": "business_industry_dependency_review", "class": { "label": "faible contribution ou action contraire \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier", "tone": "red" }, "correction_pathway": "Corrections, counter-evidence, DOI/ISBN/URL links, publication records, ORCID/imported records and reviewer notes can update this profile through the backend. Public pages do not reveal who contributes.", "country": "Global / Afrique", "entity_id": "ACT-BIZ-GLENCORE-AFRICA", "entity_type": "foreign_actor", "evidence_profile": { "actor_id": "ACT-BIZ-GLENCORE-AFRICA", "bisalu": { "proofs": [], "summary": "Evaluate tangible outputs: institutions, publications, tools, jobs, infrastructure, laws, companies and local capabilities." }, "critical_flags_uncertainties": [ "contradiction discours-actions", "effet n\u00e9gatif sur capacit\u00e9s populaires", "d\u00e9pendance strat\u00e9gique renforc\u00e9e" ], "nsiku": { "claims": [], "summary": "Evaluate rule, accountability, anti-capture boundaries and discourse-action consistency." }, "nzola": { "claims": [], "summary": "Evaluate protection of people, dignity, education, health, social repair and non-fracture." }, "profile_type": "seed_or_database_profile", "references": [], "score_note": "Starter profile. Ranking must move through evidence upload, ORCID/imported records, verified public actions and reviewer approval; not through popularity or pressure.", "source_needs": [ "reference documents", "public actions", "financial/funding sources", "right-of-reply where relevant" ], "title": "Glencore extractive footprint in Africa" }, "evidence_strength": 78, "name": "Glencore extractive footprint in Africa", "positive_components": { "A1": 0, "A10": 0, "A2": 0, "A3": 0, "A4": 0, "A5": 1, "A6": 1, "A7": 0, "A8": 0, "A9": 78 }, "positive_score": 4, "red_flags": [ "contradiction discours-actions", "effet n\u00e9gatif sur capacit\u00e9s populaires", "d\u00e9pendance strat\u00e9gique renforc\u00e9e" ], "risk_components": { "R1": 70, "R10": 65, "R11": 70, "R2": 60, "R3": 60, "R4": 70, "R5": 70, "R6": 65, "R7": 55, "R8": 60, "R9": 65 }, "role_label": { "code": "mixed", "label": "Acteur mixte / sous revue" }, "score": 0, "score_explanation": "Starter profile. Ranking must move through evidence upload, ORCID/imported records, verified public actions and reviewer approval; not through popularity or pressure.", "search_keywords": [ "Glencore extractive footprint in Africa", "Global / Afrique", "business_industry_dependency_review", "threat" ], "source": "seed", "status": "prepublication_sources_needed", "summary": "Starter evidence-gated profile for Glencore extractive footprint in Africa. Scores are provisional until source-linked documents, ORCID/OpenAlex records, public actions and right-of-reply status are attached.", "visibility": "public" }, { "capture_risk_score": 69, "category": "business_industry_dependency_review", "class": { "label": "faible contribution ou action contraire \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier", "tone": "red" }, "correction_pathway": "Corrections, counter-evidence, DOI/ISBN/URL links, publication records, ORCID/imported records and reviewer notes can update this profile through the backend. Public pages do not reveal who contributes.", "country": "Global / Afrique", "entity_id": "ACT-BIZ-RIO-TINTO-AFRICA", "entity_type": "foreign_actor", "evidence_profile": { "actor_id": "ACT-BIZ-RIO-TINTO-AFRICA", "bisalu": { "proofs": [], "summary": "Evaluate tangible outputs: institutions, publications, tools, jobs, infrastructure, laws, companies and local capabilities." }, "critical_flags_uncertainties": [ "contradiction discours-actions", "effet n\u00e9gatif sur capacit\u00e9s populaires", "d\u00e9pendance strat\u00e9gique renforc\u00e9e" ], "nsiku": { "claims": [], "summary": "Evaluate rule, accountability, anti-capture boundaries and discourse-action consistency." }, "nzola": { "claims": [], "summary": "Evaluate protection of people, dignity, education, health, social repair and non-fracture." }, "profile_type": "seed_or_database_profile", "references": [], "score_note": "Starter profile. Ranking must move through evidence upload, ORCID/imported records, verified public actions and reviewer approval; not through popularity or pressure.", "source_needs": [ "reference documents", "public actions", "financial/funding sources", "right-of-reply where relevant" ], "title": "Rio Tinto extractive footprint in Africa" }, "evidence_strength": 50, "name": "Rio Tinto extractive footprint in Africa", "positive_components": { "A1": 0, "A10": 0, "A2": 0, "A3": 0, "A4": 0, "A5": 1, "A6": 1, "A7": 0, "A8": 0, "A9": 50 }, "positive_score": 3, "red_flags": [ "contradiction discours-actions", "effet n\u00e9gatif sur capacit\u00e9s populaires", "d\u00e9pendance strat\u00e9gique renforc\u00e9e" ], "risk_components": { "R1": 74, "R10": 69, "R11": 74, "R2": 64, "R3": 64, "R4": 74, "R5": 74, "R6": 69, "R7": 59, "R8": 64, "R9": 69 }, "role_label": { "code": "dependency_vector", "label": "Vecteur de d\u00e9pendance \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier" }, "score": 0, "score_explanation": "Starter profile. Ranking must move through evidence upload, ORCID/imported records, verified public actions and reviewer approval; not through popularity or pressure.", "search_keywords": [ "Rio Tinto extractive footprint in Africa", "Global / Afrique", "business_industry_dependency_review", "threat" ], "source": "seed", "status": "prepublication_sources_needed", "summary": "Starter evidence-gated profile for Rio Tinto extractive footprint in Africa. Scores are provisional until source-linked documents, ORCID/OpenAlex records, public actions and right-of-reply status are attached.", "visibility": "public" }, { "capture_risk_score": 78, "category": "media_foundation_threats", "class": { "label": "risque \u00e9lev\u00e9 de capture / contradiction", "tone": "red" }, "correction_pathway": "Corrections, counter-evidence, DOI/ISBN/URL links, publication records, ORCID/imported records and reviewer notes can update this profile through the backend. Public pages do not reveal who contributes.", "country": "US / global", "entity_id": "ACT-RISK-NED-ADJACENT", "entity_type": "think_tank", "evidence_profile": { "actor_id": "ACT-RISK-NED-ADJACENT", "bisalu": { "proofs": [], "summary": "Evaluate tangible outputs: institutions, publications, tools, jobs, infrastructure, laws, companies and local capabilities." }, "critical_flags_uncertainties": [ "adjacence fondations/think tanks \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier", "philanthropie/visibilit\u00e9 peut masquer d\u00e9pendance", "contradiction discours-actions", "effet n\u00e9gatif sur capacit\u00e9s populaires", "affaiblissement des protections populaires", "d\u00e9pendance strat\u00e9gique renforc\u00e9e" ], "nsiku": { "claims": [], "summary": "Evaluate rule, accountability, anti-capture boundaries and discourse-action consistency." }, "nzola": { "claims": [], "summary": "Evaluate protection of people, dignity, education, health, social repair and non-fracture." }, "profile_type": "seed_or_database_profile", "references": [], "score_note": "Starter profile. Ranking must move through evidence upload, ORCID/imported records, verified public actions and reviewer approval; not through popularity or pressure.", "source_needs": [ "reference documents", "public actions", "financial/funding sources", "right-of-reply where relevant" ], "title": "NED-adjacent influence/funding pattern" }, "evidence_strength": 50, "name": "NED-adjacent influence/funding pattern", "positive_components": { "A1": 2, "A10": 0, "A2": 0, "A3": 0, "A4": 2, "A5": 7, "A6": 7, "A7": 0, "A8": 2, "A9": 50 }, "positive_score": 5, "red_flags": [ "adjacence fondations/think tanks \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier", "philanthropie/visibilit\u00e9 peut masquer d\u00e9pendance", "contradiction discours-actions", "effet n\u00e9gatif sur capacit\u00e9s populaires", "affaiblissement des protections populaires", "d\u00e9pendance strat\u00e9gique renforc\u00e9e" ], "risk_components": { "R1": 83, "R10": 78, "R11": 83, "R2": 73, "R3": 73, "R4": 83, "R5": 83, "R6": 78, "R7": 68, "R8": 73, "R9": 78 }, "role_label": { "code": "dependency_vector", "label": "Vecteur de d\u00e9pendance \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier" }, "score": 0, "score_explanation": "Starter profile. Ranking must move through evidence upload, ORCID/imported records, verified public actions and reviewer approval; not through popularity or pressure.", "search_keywords": [ "NED-adjacent influence/funding pattern", "US / global", "media_foundation_threats", "threat" ], "source": "seed", "status": "prepublication_sources_needed", "summary": "Starter evidence-gated profile for NED-adjacent influence/funding pattern. Scores are provisional until source-linked documents, ORCID/OpenAlex records, public actions and right-of-reply status are attached.", "visibility": "public" }, { "capture_risk_score": 80, "category": "media_foundation_threats", "class": { "label": "risque \u00e9lev\u00e9 de capture / contradiction", "tone": "red" }, "correction_pathway": "Corrections, counter-evidence, DOI/ISBN/URL links, publication records, ORCID/imported records and reviewer notes can update this profile through the backend. Public pages do not reveal who contributes.", "country": "US / global", "entity_id": "ACT-RISK-HERITAGE-ADJACENT", "entity_type": "think_tank", "evidence_profile": { "actor_id": "ACT-RISK-HERITAGE-ADJACENT", "bisalu": { "proofs": [], "summary": "Evaluate tangible outputs: institutions, publications, tools, jobs, infrastructure, laws, companies and local capabilities." }, "critical_flags_uncertainties": [ "adjacence fondations/think tanks \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier", "amplification externe disproportionn\u00e9e", "philanthropie/visibilit\u00e9 peut masquer d\u00e9pendance", "contradiction discours-actions", "effet n\u00e9gatif sur capacit\u00e9s populaires", "affaiblissement des protections populaires", "d\u00e9pendance strat\u00e9gique renforc\u00e9e" ], "nsiku": { "claims": [], "summary": "Evaluate rule, accountability, anti-capture boundaries and discourse-action consistency." }, "nzola": { "claims": [], "summary": "Evaluate protection of people, dignity, education, health, social repair and non-fracture." }, "profile_type": "seed_or_database_profile", "references": [], "score_note": "Starter profile. Ranking must move through evidence upload, ORCID/imported records, verified public actions and reviewer approval; not through popularity or pressure.", "source_needs": [ "reference documents", "public actions", "financial/funding sources", "right-of-reply where relevant" ], "title": "Heritage-adjacent policy influence pattern" }, "evidence_strength": 50, "name": "Heritage-adjacent policy influence pattern", "positive_components": { "A1": 2, "A10": 0, "A2": 0, "A3": 0, "A4": 2, "A5": 7, "A6": 7, "A7": 0, "A8": 2, "A9": 50 }, "positive_score": 5, "red_flags": [ "adjacence fondations/think tanks \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier", "amplification externe disproportionn\u00e9e", "philanthropie/visibilit\u00e9 peut masquer d\u00e9pendance", "contradiction discours-actions", "effet n\u00e9gatif sur capacit\u00e9s populaires", "affaiblissement des protections populaires", "d\u00e9pendance strat\u00e9gique renforc\u00e9e" ], "risk_components": { "R1": 85, "R10": 80, "R11": 85, "R2": 75, "R3": 75, "R4": 85, "R5": 85, "R6": 80, "R7": 70, "R8": 75, "R9": 80 }, "role_label": { "code": "dependency_vector", "label": "Vecteur de d\u00e9pendance \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier" }, "score": 0, "score_explanation": "Starter profile. Ranking must move through evidence upload, ORCID/imported records, verified public actions and reviewer approval; not through popularity or pressure.", "search_keywords": [ "Heritage-adjacent policy influence pattern", "US / global", "media_foundation_threats", "threat" ], "source": "seed", "status": "prepublication_sources_needed", "summary": "Starter evidence-gated profile for Heritage-adjacent policy influence pattern. Scores are provisional until source-linked documents, ORCID/OpenAlex records, public actions and right-of-reply status are attached.", "visibility": "public" }, { "capture_risk_score": 82, "category": "media_foundation_threats", "class": { "label": "risque \u00e9lev\u00e9 de capture / contradiction", "tone": "red" }, "correction_pathway": "Corrections, counter-evidence, DOI/ISBN/URL links, publication records, ORCID/imported records and reviewer notes can update this profile through the backend. Public pages do not reveal who contributes.", "country": "Global / Afrique", "entity_id": "ACT-RISK-FOREIGN-NGO-DEPENDENCY", "entity_type": "think_tank", "evidence_profile": { "actor_id": "ACT-RISK-FOREIGN-NGO-DEPENDENCY", "bisalu": { "proofs": [], "summary": "Evaluate tangible outputs: institutions, publications, tools, jobs, infrastructure, laws, companies and local capabilities." }, "critical_flags_uncertainties": [ "adjacence fondations/think tanks \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier", "amplification externe disproportionn\u00e9e", "philanthropie/visibilit\u00e9 peut masquer d\u00e9pendance", "contradiction discours-actions", "effet n\u00e9gatif sur capacit\u00e9s populaires", "affaiblissement des protections populaires", "d\u00e9pendance strat\u00e9gique renforc\u00e9e" ], "nsiku": { "claims": [], "summary": "Evaluate rule, accountability, anti-capture boundaries and discourse-action consistency." }, "nzola": { "claims": [], "summary": "Evaluate protection of people, dignity, education, health, social repair and non-fracture." }, "profile_type": "seed_or_database_profile", "references": [], "score_note": "Starter profile. Ranking must move through evidence upload, ORCID/imported records, verified public actions and reviewer approval; not through popularity or pressure.", "source_needs": [ "reference documents", "public actions", "financial/funding sources", "right-of-reply where relevant" ], "title": "Foreign NGO dependency pattern" }, "evidence_strength": 50, "name": "Foreign NGO dependency pattern", "positive_components": { "A1": 2, "A10": 0, "A2": 0, "A3": 0, "A4": 2, "A5": 7, "A6": 7, "A7": 0, "A8": 2, "A9": 50 }, "positive_score": 5, "red_flags": [ "adjacence fondations/think tanks \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier", "amplification externe disproportionn\u00e9e", "philanthropie/visibilit\u00e9 peut masquer d\u00e9pendance", "contradiction discours-actions", "effet n\u00e9gatif sur capacit\u00e9s populaires", "affaiblissement des protections populaires", "d\u00e9pendance strat\u00e9gique renforc\u00e9e" ], "risk_components": { "R1": 87, "R10": 82, "R11": 87, "R2": 77, "R3": 77, "R4": 87, "R5": 87, "R6": 82, "R7": 72, "R8": 77, "R9": 82 }, "role_label": { "code": "capture_threat", "label": "Menace / capture-risk \u00e9lev\u00e9" }, "score": 0, "score_explanation": "Starter profile. Ranking must move through evidence upload, ORCID/imported records, verified public actions and reviewer approval; not through popularity or pressure.", "search_keywords": [ "Foreign NGO dependency pattern", "Global / Afrique", "media_foundation_threats", "threat" ], "source": "seed", "status": "prepublication_sources_needed", "summary": "Starter evidence-gated profile for Foreign NGO dependency pattern. Scores are provisional until source-linked documents, ORCID/OpenAlex records, public actions and right-of-reply status are attached.", "visibility": "public" }, { "capture_risk_score": 88, "category": "media_foundation_threats", "class": { "label": "risque \u00e9lev\u00e9 de capture / contradiction", "tone": "red" }, "correction_pathway": "Corrections, counter-evidence, DOI/ISBN/URL links, publication records, ORCID/imported records and reviewer notes can update this profile through the backend. Public pages do not reveal who contributes.", "country": "Global / Afrique", "entity_id": "ACT-RISK-FOREIGN-ARBITRATION", "entity_type": "think_tank", "evidence_profile": { "actor_id": "ACT-RISK-FOREIGN-ARBITRATION", "bisalu": { "proofs": [], "summary": "Evaluate tangible outputs: institutions, publications, tools, jobs, infrastructure, laws, companies and local capabilities." }, "critical_flags_uncertainties": [ "adjacence fondations/think tanks \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier", "amplification externe disproportionn\u00e9e", "philanthropie/visibilit\u00e9 peut masquer d\u00e9pendance", "contradiction discours-actions", "effet n\u00e9gatif sur capacit\u00e9s populaires", "affaiblissement des protections populaires", "d\u00e9pendance strat\u00e9gique renforc\u00e9e" ], "nsiku": { "claims": [], "summary": "Evaluate rule, accountability, anti-capture boundaries and discourse-action consistency." }, "nzola": { "claims": [], "summary": "Evaluate protection of people, dignity, education, health, social repair and non-fracture." }, "profile_type": "seed_or_database_profile", "references": [], "score_note": "Starter profile. Ranking must move through evidence upload, ORCID/imported records, verified public actions and reviewer approval; not through popularity or pressure.", "source_needs": [ "reference documents", "public actions", "financial/funding sources", "right-of-reply where relevant" ], "title": "Foreign arbitration/legal capture networks" }, "evidence_strength": 50, "name": "Foreign arbitration/legal capture networks", "positive_components": { "A1": 2, "A10": 0, "A2": 0, "A3": 0, "A4": 2, "A5": 7, "A6": 7, "A7": 0, "A8": 2, "A9": 50 }, "positive_score": 5, "red_flags": [ "adjacence fondations/think tanks \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier", "amplification externe disproportionn\u00e9e", "philanthropie/visibilit\u00e9 peut masquer d\u00e9pendance", "contradiction discours-actions", "effet n\u00e9gatif sur capacit\u00e9s populaires", "affaiblissement des protections populaires", "d\u00e9pendance strat\u00e9gique renforc\u00e9e" ], "risk_components": { "R1": 93, "R10": 88, "R11": 93, "R2": 83, "R3": 83, "R4": 93, "R5": 93, "R6": 88, "R7": 78, "R8": 83, "R9": 88 }, "role_label": { "code": "capture_threat", "label": "Menace / capture-risk \u00e9lev\u00e9" }, "score": 0, "score_explanation": "Starter profile. Ranking must move through evidence upload, ORCID/imported records, verified public actions and reviewer approval; not through popularity or pressure.", "search_keywords": [ "Foreign arbitration/legal capture networks", "Global / Afrique", "media_foundation_threats", "threat" ], "source": "seed", "status": "prepublication_sources_needed", "summary": "Starter evidence-gated profile for Foreign arbitration/legal capture networks. Scores are provisional until source-linked documents, ORCID/OpenAlex records, public actions and right-of-reply status are attached.", "visibility": "public" }, { "capture_risk_score": 85, "category": "media_foundation_threats", "class": { "label": "risque \u00e9lev\u00e9 de capture / contradiction", "tone": "red" }, "correction_pathway": "Corrections, counter-evidence, DOI/ISBN/URL links, publication records, ORCID/imported records and reviewer notes can update this profile through the backend. Public pages do not reveal who contributes.", "country": "Global / Afrique", "entity_id": "ACT-RISK-FOREIGN-CLOUD-LOCKIN", "entity_type": "think_tank", "evidence_profile": { "actor_id": "ACT-RISK-FOREIGN-CLOUD-LOCKIN", "bisalu": { "proofs": [], "summary": "Evaluate tangible outputs: institutions, publications, tools, jobs, infrastructure, laws, companies and local capabilities." }, "critical_flags_uncertainties": [ "adjacence fondations/think tanks \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier", "amplification externe disproportionn\u00e9e", "philanthropie/visibilit\u00e9 peut masquer d\u00e9pendance", "contradiction discours-actions", "effet n\u00e9gatif sur capacit\u00e9s populaires", "affaiblissement des protections populaires", "d\u00e9pendance strat\u00e9gique renforc\u00e9e" ], "nsiku": { "claims": [], "summary": "Evaluate rule, accountability, anti-capture boundaries and discourse-action consistency." }, "nzola": { "claims": [], "summary": "Evaluate protection of people, dignity, education, health, social repair and non-fracture." }, "profile_type": "seed_or_database_profile", "references": [], "score_note": "Starter profile. Ranking must move through evidence upload, ORCID/imported records, verified public actions and reviewer approval; not through popularity or pressure.", "source_needs": [ "reference documents", "public actions", "financial/funding sources", "right-of-reply where relevant" ], "title": "Foreign cloud/data lock-in networks" }, "evidence_strength": 50, "name": "Foreign cloud/data lock-in networks", "positive_components": { "A1": 2, "A10": 0, "A2": 0, "A3": 0, "A4": 2, "A5": 7, "A6": 7, "A7": 0, "A8": 2, "A9": 50 }, "positive_score": 5, "red_flags": [ "adjacence fondations/think tanks \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier", "amplification externe disproportionn\u00e9e", "philanthropie/visibilit\u00e9 peut masquer d\u00e9pendance", "contradiction discours-actions", "effet n\u00e9gatif sur capacit\u00e9s populaires", "affaiblissement des protections populaires", "d\u00e9pendance strat\u00e9gique renforc\u00e9e" ], "risk_components": { "R1": 90, "R10": 85, "R11": 90, "R2": 80, "R3": 80, "R4": 90, "R5": 90, "R6": 85, "R7": 75, "R8": 80, "R9": 85 }, "role_label": { "code": "capture_threat", "label": "Menace / capture-risk \u00e9lev\u00e9" }, "score": 0, "score_explanation": "Starter profile. Ranking must move through evidence upload, ORCID/imported records, verified public actions and reviewer approval; not through popularity or pressure.", "search_keywords": [ "Foreign cloud/data lock-in networks", "Global / Afrique", "media_foundation_threats", "threat" ], "source": "seed", "status": "prepublication_sources_needed", "summary": "Starter evidence-gated profile for Foreign cloud/data lock-in networks. Scores are provisional until source-linked documents, ORCID/OpenAlex records, public actions and right-of-reply status are attached.", "visibility": "public" }, { "capture_risk_score": 90, "category": "media_foundation_threats", "class": { "label": "risque \u00e9lev\u00e9 de capture / contradiction", "tone": "red" }, "correction_pathway": "Corrections, counter-evidence, DOI/ISBN/URL links, publication records, ORCID/imported records and reviewer notes can update this profile through the backend. Public pages do not reveal who contributes.", "country": "France / Afrique", "entity_id": "ACT-RISK-CFA-NETWORKS", "entity_type": "think_tank", "evidence_profile": { "actor_id": "ACT-RISK-CFA-NETWORKS", "bisalu": { "proofs": [], "summary": "Evaluate tangible outputs: institutions, publications, tools, jobs, infrastructure, laws, companies and local capabilities." }, "critical_flags_uncertainties": [ "adjacence fondations/think tanks \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier", "amplification externe disproportionn\u00e9e", "philanthropie/visibilit\u00e9 peut masquer d\u00e9pendance", "contradiction discours-actions", "effet n\u00e9gatif sur capacit\u00e9s populaires", "affaiblissement des protections populaires", "d\u00e9pendance strat\u00e9gique renforc\u00e9e" ], "nsiku": { "claims": [], "summary": "Evaluate rule, accountability, anti-capture boundaries and discourse-action consistency." }, "nzola": { "claims": [], "summary": "Evaluate protection of people, dignity, education, health, social repair and non-fracture." }, "profile_type": "seed_or_database_profile", "references": [], "score_note": "Starter profile. Ranking must move through evidence upload, ORCID/imported records, verified public actions and reviewer approval; not through popularity or pressure.", "source_needs": [ "reference documents", "public actions", "financial/funding sources", "right-of-reply where relevant" ], "title": "CFA/francophone monetary dependency networks" }, "evidence_strength": 50, "name": "CFA/francophone monetary dependency networks", "positive_components": { "A1": 2, "A10": 0, "A2": 0, "A3": 0, "A4": 2, "A5": 7, "A6": 7, "A7": 0, "A8": 2, "A9": 50 }, "positive_score": 5, "red_flags": [ "adjacence fondations/think tanks \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier", "amplification externe disproportionn\u00e9e", "philanthropie/visibilit\u00e9 peut masquer d\u00e9pendance", "contradiction discours-actions", "effet n\u00e9gatif sur capacit\u00e9s populaires", "affaiblissement des protections populaires", "d\u00e9pendance strat\u00e9gique renforc\u00e9e" ], "risk_components": { "R1": 95, "R10": 90, "R11": 95, "R2": 85, "R3": 85, "R4": 95, "R5": 95, "R6": 90, "R7": 80, "R8": 85, "R9": 90 }, "role_label": { "code": "capture_threat", "label": "Menace / capture-risk \u00e9lev\u00e9" }, "score": 0, "score_explanation": "Starter profile. Ranking must move through evidence upload, ORCID/imported records, verified public actions and reviewer approval; not through popularity or pressure.", "search_keywords": [ "CFA/francophone monetary dependency networks", "France / Afrique", "media_foundation_threats", "threat" ], "source": "seed", "status": "prepublication_sources_needed", "summary": "Starter evidence-gated profile for CFA/francophone monetary dependency networks. Scores are provisional until source-linked documents, ORCID/OpenAlex records, public actions and right-of-reply status are attached.", "visibility": "public" }, { "capture_risk_score": 82, "category": "current_political_civic_patterns", "class": { "label": "risque \u00e9lev\u00e9 de capture / contradiction", "tone": "red" }, "correction_pathway": "Corrections, counter-evidence, DOI/ISBN/URL links, publication records, ORCID/imported records and reviewer notes can update this profile through the backend. Public pages do not reveal who contributes.", "country": "Afrique du Sud", "entity_id": "ACT-CURRENT-OPERATION-DUDULA", "entity_type": "political_apparatus", "evidence_profile": { "actor_id": "ACT-CURRENT-OPERATION-DUDULA", "bisalu": { "proofs": [], "summary": "Evaluate tangible outputs: institutions, publications, tools, jobs, infrastructure, laws, companies and local capabilities." }, "critical_flags_uncertainties": [ "adjacence fondations/think tanks \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier", "amplification externe disproportionn\u00e9e", "philanthropie/visibilit\u00e9 peut masquer d\u00e9pendance", "contradiction discours-actions", "effet n\u00e9gatif sur capacit\u00e9s populaires", "affaiblissement des protections populaires", "d\u00e9pendance strat\u00e9gique renforc\u00e9e" ], "nsiku": { "claims": [], "summary": "Evaluate rule, accountability, anti-capture boundaries and discourse-action consistency." }, "nzola": { "claims": [], "summary": "Evaluate protection of people, dignity, education, health, social repair and non-fracture." }, "profile_type": "seed_or_database_profile", "references": [], "score_note": "Starter profile. Ranking must move through evidence upload, ORCID/imported records, verified public actions and reviewer approval; not through popularity or pressure.", "source_needs": [ "reference documents", "public actions", "financial/funding sources", "right-of-reply where relevant" ], "title": "Operation Dudula / anti-migrant fracture pattern" }, "evidence_strength": 55, "name": "Operation Dudula / anti-migrant fracture pattern", "positive_components": { "A1": 0, "A10": 0, "A2": 0, "A3": 0, "A4": 0, "A5": 0, "A6": 0, "A7": 0, "A8": 0, "A9": 55 }, "positive_score": 3, "red_flags": [ "adjacence fondations/think tanks \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier", "amplification externe disproportionn\u00e9e", "philanthropie/visibilit\u00e9 peut masquer d\u00e9pendance", "contradiction discours-actions", "effet n\u00e9gatif sur capacit\u00e9s populaires", "affaiblissement des protections populaires", "d\u00e9pendance strat\u00e9gique renforc\u00e9e" ], "risk_components": { "R1": 87, "R10": 82, "R11": 87, "R2": 77, "R3": 77, "R4": 87, "R5": 87, "R6": 82, "R7": 72, "R8": 77, "R9": 82 }, "role_label": { "code": "capture_threat", "label": "Menace / capture-risk \u00e9lev\u00e9" }, "score": 0, "score_explanation": "Starter profile. Ranking must move through evidence upload, ORCID/imported records, verified public actions and reviewer approval; not through popularity or pressure.", "search_keywords": [ "Operation Dudula / anti-migrant fracture pattern", "Afrique du Sud", "current_political_civic_patterns", "threat" ], "source": "seed", "status": "prepublication_sources_needed", "summary": "Starter evidence-gated profile for Operation Dudula / anti-migrant fracture pattern. Scores are provisional until source-linked documents, ORCID/OpenAlex records, public actions and right-of-reply status are attached.", "visibility": "public" }, { "capture_risk_score": 92, "category": "threat_capture_risk_practical", "class": { "label": "risque \u00e9lev\u00e9 de capture / contradiction", "tone": "red" }, "correction_pathway": "Corrections, counter-evidence, DOI/ISBN/URL links, publication records, ORCID/imported records and reviewer notes can update this profile through the backend. Public pages do not reveal who contributes.", "country": "Global / Afrique", "entity_id": "ACT-THREAT-WORLD-BANK-IMF-CONDITIONALITY", "entity_type": "foundation", "evidence_profile": { "actor_id": "ACT-THREAT-WORLD-BANK-IMF-CONDITIONALITY", "bisalu": { "proofs": [], "summary": "Evaluate tangible outputs: institutions, publications, tools, jobs, infrastructure, laws, companies and local capabilities." }, "critical_flags_uncertainties": [ "adjacence fondations/think tanks \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier", "amplification externe disproportionn\u00e9e", "philanthropie/visibilit\u00e9 peut masquer d\u00e9pendance", "contradiction discours-actions", "effet n\u00e9gatif sur capacit\u00e9s populaires", "affaiblissement des protections populaires", "d\u00e9pendance strat\u00e9gique renforc\u00e9e" ], "nsiku": { "claims": [], "summary": "Evaluate rule, accountability, anti-capture boundaries and discourse-action consistency." }, "nzola": { "claims": [], "summary": "Evaluate protection of people, dignity, education, health, social repair and non-fracture." }, "profile_type": "seed_or_database_profile", "references": [], "score_note": "Starter profile. Ranking must move through evidence upload, ORCID/imported records, verified public actions and reviewer approval; not through popularity or pressure.", "source_needs": [ "reference documents", "public actions", "financial/funding sources", "right-of-reply where relevant" ], "title": "World Bank / IMF conditionality and fiscal dependency pattern" }, "evidence_strength": 60, "name": "World Bank / IMF conditionality and fiscal dependency pattern", "positive_components": { "A1": 0, "A10": 0, "A2": 0, "A3": 0, "A4": 0, "A5": 0, "A6": 0, "A7": 0, "A8": 0, "A9": 60 }, "positive_score": 3, "red_flags": [ "adjacence fondations/think tanks \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier", "amplification externe disproportionn\u00e9e", "philanthropie/visibilit\u00e9 peut masquer d\u00e9pendance", "contradiction discours-actions", "effet n\u00e9gatif sur capacit\u00e9s populaires", "affaiblissement des protections populaires", "d\u00e9pendance strat\u00e9gique renforc\u00e9e" ], "risk_components": { "R1": 97, "R10": 92, "R11": 97, "R2": 87, "R3": 87, "R4": 97, "R5": 97, "R6": 92, "R7": 82, "R8": 87, "R9": 92 }, "role_label": { "code": "capture_threat", "label": "Menace / capture-risk \u00e9lev\u00e9" }, "score": 0, "score_explanation": "Starter profile. Ranking must move through evidence upload, ORCID/imported records, verified public actions and reviewer approval; not through popularity or pressure.", "search_keywords": [ "World Bank / IMF conditionality and fiscal dependency pattern", "Global / Afrique", "threat_capture_risk_practical", "threat" ], "source": "seed", "status": "prepublication_sources_needed", "summary": "Evidence-gated threat pattern. Not an enemy label; assesses repeatable dependency, extraction, fracture or capture mechanics.", "visibility": "public" }, { "capture_risk_score": 82, "category": "threat_capture_risk_practical", "class": { "label": "risque \u00e9lev\u00e9 de capture / contradiction", "tone": "red" }, "correction_pathway": "Corrections, counter-evidence, DOI/ISBN/URL links, publication records, ORCID/imported records and reviewer notes can update this profile through the backend. Public pages do not reveal who contributes.", "country": "Global / Afrique", "entity_id": "ACT-THREAT-FOREIGN-PAYMENT-RAILS", "entity_type": "foreign_actor", "evidence_profile": { "actor_id": "ACT-THREAT-FOREIGN-PAYMENT-RAILS", "bisalu": { "proofs": [], "summary": "Evaluate tangible outputs: institutions, publications, tools, jobs, infrastructure, laws, companies and local capabilities." }, "critical_flags_uncertainties": [ "adjacence fondations/think tanks \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier", "amplification externe disproportionn\u00e9e", "philanthropie/visibilit\u00e9 peut masquer d\u00e9pendance", "contradiction discours-actions", "effet n\u00e9gatif sur capacit\u00e9s populaires", "affaiblissement des protections populaires", "d\u00e9pendance strat\u00e9gique renforc\u00e9e" ], "nsiku": { "claims": [], "summary": "Evaluate rule, accountability, anti-capture boundaries and discourse-action consistency." }, "nzola": { "claims": [], "summary": "Evaluate protection of people, dignity, education, health, social repair and non-fracture." }, "profile_type": "seed_or_database_profile", "references": [], "score_note": "Starter profile. Ranking must move through evidence upload, ORCID/imported records, verified public actions and reviewer approval; not through popularity or pressure.", "source_needs": [ "reference documents", "public actions", "financial/funding sources", "right-of-reply where relevant" ], "title": "Visa/Mastercard and foreign payment rail dependency" }, "evidence_strength": 52, "name": "Visa/Mastercard and foreign payment rail dependency", "positive_components": { "A1": 0, "A10": 0, "A2": 0, "A3": 0, "A4": 0, "A5": 0, "A6": 0, "A7": 0, "A8": 0, "A9": 52 }, "positive_score": 3, "red_flags": [ "adjacence fondations/think tanks \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier", "amplification externe disproportionn\u00e9e", "philanthropie/visibilit\u00e9 peut masquer d\u00e9pendance", "contradiction discours-actions", "effet n\u00e9gatif sur capacit\u00e9s populaires", "affaiblissement des protections populaires", "d\u00e9pendance strat\u00e9gique renforc\u00e9e" ], "risk_components": { "R1": 87, "R10": 82, "R11": 87, "R2": 77, "R3": 77, "R4": 87, "R5": 87, "R6": 82, "R7": 72, "R8": 77, "R9": 82 }, "role_label": { "code": "capture_threat", "label": "Menace / capture-risk \u00e9lev\u00e9" }, "score": 0, "score_explanation": "Starter profile. Ranking must move through evidence upload, ORCID/imported records, verified public actions and reviewer approval; not through popularity or pressure.", "search_keywords": [ "Visa/Mastercard and foreign payment rail dependency", "Global / Afrique", "threat_capture_risk_practical", "threat" ], "source": "seed", "status": "prepublication_sources_needed", "summary": "Evidence-gated threat pattern. Not an enemy label; assesses repeatable dependency, extraction, fracture or capture mechanics.", "visibility": "public" }, { "capture_risk_score": 88, "category": "threat_capture_risk_practical", "class": { "label": "risque \u00e9lev\u00e9 de capture / contradiction", "tone": "red" }, "correction_pathway": "Corrections, counter-evidence, DOI/ISBN/URL links, publication records, ORCID/imported records and reviewer notes can update this profile through the backend. Public pages do not reveal who contributes.", "country": "US / Global / Afrique", "entity_id": "ACT-THREAT-BIG-TECH-CLOUD-AFRICA", "entity_type": "foreign_actor", "evidence_profile": { "actor_id": "ACT-THREAT-BIG-TECH-CLOUD-AFRICA", "bisalu": { "proofs": [], "summary": "Evaluate tangible outputs: institutions, publications, tools, jobs, infrastructure, laws, companies and local capabilities." }, "critical_flags_uncertainties": [ "adjacence fondations/think tanks \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier", "amplification externe disproportionn\u00e9e", "philanthropie/visibilit\u00e9 peut masquer d\u00e9pendance", "contradiction discours-actions", "effet n\u00e9gatif sur capacit\u00e9s populaires", "affaiblissement des protections populaires", "d\u00e9pendance strat\u00e9gique renforc\u00e9e" ], "nsiku": { "claims": [], "summary": "Evaluate rule, accountability, anti-capture boundaries and discourse-action consistency." }, "nzola": { "claims": [], "summary": "Evaluate protection of people, dignity, education, health, social repair and non-fracture." }, "profile_type": "seed_or_database_profile", "references": [], "score_note": "Starter profile. Ranking must move through evidence upload, ORCID/imported records, verified public actions and reviewer approval; not through popularity or pressure.", "source_needs": [ "reference documents", "public actions", "financial/funding sources", "right-of-reply where relevant" ], "title": "Big Tech cloud/data lock-in in African public systems" }, "evidence_strength": 52, "name": "Big Tech cloud/data lock-in in African public systems", "positive_components": { "A1": 0, "A10": 0, "A2": 0, "A3": 0, "A4": 0, "A5": 0, "A6": 0, "A7": 0, "A8": 0, "A9": 52 }, "positive_score": 3, "red_flags": [ "adjacence fondations/think tanks \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier", "amplification externe disproportionn\u00e9e", "philanthropie/visibilit\u00e9 peut masquer d\u00e9pendance", "contradiction discours-actions", "effet n\u00e9gatif sur capacit\u00e9s populaires", "affaiblissement des protections populaires", "d\u00e9pendance strat\u00e9gique renforc\u00e9e" ], "risk_components": { "R1": 93, "R10": 88, "R11": 93, "R2": 83, "R3": 83, "R4": 93, "R5": 93, "R6": 88, "R7": 78, "R8": 83, "R9": 88 }, "role_label": { "code": "capture_threat", "label": "Menace / capture-risk \u00e9lev\u00e9" }, "score": 0, "score_explanation": "Starter profile. Ranking must move through evidence upload, ORCID/imported records, verified public actions and reviewer approval; not through popularity or pressure.", "search_keywords": [ "Big Tech cloud/data lock-in in African public systems", "US / Global / Afrique", "threat_capture_risk_practical", "threat" ], "source": "seed", "status": "prepublication_sources_needed", "summary": "Evidence-gated threat pattern. Not an enemy label; assesses repeatable dependency, extraction, fracture or capture mechanics.", "visibility": "public" }, { "capture_risk_score": 76, "category": "threat_capture_risk_practical", "class": { "label": "risque \u00e9lev\u00e9 de capture / contradiction", "tone": "red" }, "correction_pathway": "Corrections, counter-evidence, DOI/ISBN/URL links, publication records, ORCID/imported records and reviewer notes can update this profile through the backend. Public pages do not reveal who contributes.", "country": "US / Afrique", "entity_id": "ACT-THREAT-STARLINK-SATELLITE-DEPENDENCY", "entity_type": "foreign_actor", "evidence_profile": { "actor_id": "ACT-THREAT-STARLINK-SATELLITE-DEPENDENCY", "bisalu": { "proofs": [], "summary": "Evaluate tangible outputs: institutions, publications, tools, jobs, infrastructure, laws, companies and local capabilities." }, "critical_flags_uncertainties": [ "adjacence fondations/think tanks \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier", "philanthropie/visibilit\u00e9 peut masquer d\u00e9pendance", "contradiction discours-actions", "effet n\u00e9gatif sur capacit\u00e9s populaires", "affaiblissement des protections populaires", "d\u00e9pendance strat\u00e9gique renforc\u00e9e" ], "nsiku": { "claims": [], "summary": "Evaluate rule, accountability, anti-capture boundaries and discourse-action consistency." }, "nzola": { "claims": [], "summary": "Evaluate protection of people, dignity, education, health, social repair and non-fracture." }, "profile_type": "seed_or_database_profile", "references": [], "score_note": "Starter profile. Ranking must move through evidence upload, ORCID/imported records, verified public actions and reviewer approval; not through popularity or pressure.", "source_needs": [ "reference documents", "public actions", "financial/funding sources", "right-of-reply where relevant" ], "title": "Satellite internet dependency and spectrum/data-sovereignty risk" }, "evidence_strength": 48, "name": "Satellite internet dependency and spectrum/data-sovereignty risk", "positive_components": { "A1": 0, "A10": 0, "A2": 0, "A3": 0, "A4": 0, "A5": 0, "A6": 0, "A7": 0, "A8": 0, "A9": 48 }, "positive_score": 2, "red_flags": [ "adjacence fondations/think tanks \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier", "philanthropie/visibilit\u00e9 peut masquer d\u00e9pendance", "contradiction discours-actions", "effet n\u00e9gatif sur capacit\u00e9s populaires", "affaiblissement des protections populaires", "d\u00e9pendance strat\u00e9gique renforc\u00e9e" ], "risk_components": { "R1": 81, "R10": 76, "R11": 81, "R2": 71, "R3": 71, "R4": 81, "R5": 81, "R6": 76, "R7": 66, "R8": 71, "R9": 76 }, "role_label": { "code": "dependency_vector", "label": "Vecteur de d\u00e9pendance \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier" }, "score": 0, "score_explanation": "Starter profile. Ranking must move through evidence upload, ORCID/imported records, verified public actions and reviewer approval; not through popularity or pressure.", "search_keywords": [ "Satellite internet dependency and spectrum/data-sovereignty risk", "US / Afrique", "threat_capture_risk_practical", "threat" ], "source": "seed", "status": "prepublication_sources_needed", "summary": "Evidence-gated threat pattern. Not an enemy label; assesses repeatable dependency, extraction, fracture or capture mechanics.", "visibility": "public" }, { "capture_risk_score": 97, "category": "threat_capture_risk_practical", "class": { "label": "risque \u00e9lev\u00e9 de capture / contradiction", "tone": "red" }, "correction_pathway": "Corrections, counter-evidence, DOI/ISBN/URL links, publication records, ORCID/imported records and reviewer notes can update this profile through the backend. Public pages do not reveal who contributes.", "country": "Global / Afrique", "entity_id": "ACT-THREAT-FOREIGN-PRIVATE-MILITARY-COMPANIES", "entity_type": "military_or_security_actor", "evidence_profile": { "actor_id": "ACT-THREAT-FOREIGN-PRIVATE-MILITARY-COMPANIES", "bisalu": { "proofs": [], "summary": "Evaluate tangible outputs: institutions, publications, tools, jobs, infrastructure, laws, companies and local capabilities." }, "critical_flags_uncertainties": [ "adjacence fondations/think tanks \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier", "amplification externe disproportionn\u00e9e", "philanthropie/visibilit\u00e9 peut masquer d\u00e9pendance", "contradiction discours-actions", "effet n\u00e9gatif sur capacit\u00e9s populaires", "affaiblissement des protections populaires", "d\u00e9pendance strat\u00e9gique renforc\u00e9e" ], "nsiku": { "claims": [], "summary": "Evaluate rule, accountability, anti-capture boundaries and discourse-action consistency." }, "nzola": { "claims": [], "summary": "Evaluate protection of people, dignity, education, health, social repair and non-fracture." }, "profile_type": "seed_or_database_profile", "references": [], "score_note": "Starter profile. Ranking must move through evidence upload, ORCID/imported records, verified public actions and reviewer approval; not through popularity or pressure.", "source_needs": [ "reference documents", "public actions", "financial/funding sources", "right-of-reply where relevant" ], "title": "Foreign private military companies and resource-security capture" }, "evidence_strength": 56, "name": "Foreign private military companies and resource-security capture", "positive_components": { "A1": 0, "A10": 0, "A2": 0, "A3": 0, "A4": 0, "A5": 0, "A6": 0, "A7": 0, "A8": 0, "A9": 56 }, "positive_score": 3, "red_flags": [ "adjacence fondations/think tanks \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier", "amplification externe disproportionn\u00e9e", "philanthropie/visibilit\u00e9 peut masquer d\u00e9pendance", "contradiction discours-actions", "effet n\u00e9gatif sur capacit\u00e9s populaires", "affaiblissement des protections populaires", "d\u00e9pendance strat\u00e9gique renforc\u00e9e" ], "risk_components": { "R1": 100, "R10": 98, "R11": 100, "R2": 93, "R3": 93, "R4": 100, "R5": 100, "R6": 98, "R7": 88, "R8": 93, "R9": 98 }, "role_label": { "code": "capture_threat", "label": "Menace / capture-risk \u00e9lev\u00e9" }, "score": 0, "score_explanation": "Starter profile. Ranking must move through evidence upload, ORCID/imported records, verified public actions and reviewer approval; not through popularity or pressure.", "search_keywords": [ "Foreign private military companies and resource-security capture", "Global / Afrique", "threat_capture_risk_practical", "threat" ], "source": "seed", "status": "prepublication_sources_needed", "summary": "Evidence-gated threat pattern. Not an enemy label; assesses repeatable dependency, extraction, fracture or capture mechanics.", "visibility": "public" }, { "capture_risk_score": 86, "category": "threat_capture_risk_practical", "class": { "label": "risque \u00e9lev\u00e9 de capture / contradiction", "tone": "red" }, "correction_pathway": "Corrections, counter-evidence, DOI/ISBN/URL links, publication records, ORCID/imported records and reviewer notes can update this profile through the backend. Public pages do not reveal who contributes.", "country": "Global / Afrique", "entity_id": "ACT-THREAT-FOREIGN-NGO-EMERGENCY-INDUSTRY", "entity_type": "foundation", "evidence_profile": { "actor_id": "ACT-THREAT-FOREIGN-NGO-EMERGENCY-INDUSTRY", "bisalu": { "proofs": [], "summary": "Evaluate tangible outputs: institutions, publications, tools, jobs, infrastructure, laws, companies and local capabilities." }, "critical_flags_uncertainties": [ "adjacence fondations/think tanks \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier", "amplification externe disproportionn\u00e9e", "philanthropie/visibilit\u00e9 peut masquer d\u00e9pendance", "contradiction discours-actions", "effet n\u00e9gatif sur capacit\u00e9s populaires", "affaiblissement des protections populaires", "d\u00e9pendance strat\u00e9gique renforc\u00e9e" ], "nsiku": { "claims": [], "summary": "Evaluate rule, accountability, anti-capture boundaries and discourse-action consistency." }, "nzola": { "claims": [], "summary": "Evaluate protection of people, dignity, education, health, social repair and non-fracture." }, "profile_type": "seed_or_database_profile", "references": [], "score_note": "Starter profile. Ranking must move through evidence upload, ORCID/imported records, verified public actions and reviewer approval; not through popularity or pressure.", "source_needs": [ "reference documents", "public actions", "financial/funding sources", "right-of-reply where relevant" ], "title": "Foreign NGO emergency industry and aid dependency pattern" }, "evidence_strength": 54, "name": "Foreign NGO emergency industry and aid dependency pattern", "positive_components": { "A1": 0, "A10": 0, "A2": 0, "A3": 0, "A4": 0, "A5": 0, "A6": 0, "A7": 0, "A8": 0, "A9": 54 }, "positive_score": 3, "red_flags": [ "adjacence fondations/think tanks \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier", "amplification externe disproportionn\u00e9e", "philanthropie/visibilit\u00e9 peut masquer d\u00e9pendance", "contradiction discours-actions", "effet n\u00e9gatif sur capacit\u00e9s populaires", "affaiblissement des protections populaires", "d\u00e9pendance strat\u00e9gique renforc\u00e9e" ], "risk_components": { "R1": 91, "R10": 86, "R11": 91, "R2": 81, "R3": 81, "R4": 91, "R5": 91, "R6": 86, "R7": 76, "R8": 81, "R9": 86 }, "role_label": { "code": "capture_threat", "label": "Menace / capture-risk \u00e9lev\u00e9" }, "score": 0, "score_explanation": "Starter profile. Ranking must move through evidence upload, ORCID/imported records, verified public actions and reviewer approval; not through popularity or pressure.", "search_keywords": [ "Foreign NGO emergency industry and aid dependency pattern", "Global / Afrique", "threat_capture_risk_practical", "threat" ], "source": "seed", "status": "prepublication_sources_needed", "summary": "Evidence-gated threat pattern. Not an enemy label; assesses repeatable dependency, extraction, fracture or capture mechanics.", "visibility": "public" }, { "capture_risk_score": 84, "category": "threat_capture_risk_practical", "class": { "label": "risque \u00e9lev\u00e9 de capture / contradiction", "tone": "red" }, "correction_pathway": "Corrections, counter-evidence, DOI/ISBN/URL links, publication records, ORCID/imported records and reviewer notes can update this profile through the backend. Public pages do not reveal who contributes.", "country": "Global / Afrique", "entity_id": "ACT-THREAT-SOCIAL-MEDIA-ALGORITHMIC-CAPTURE", "entity_type": "foreign_actor", "evidence_profile": { "actor_id": "ACT-THREAT-SOCIAL-MEDIA-ALGORITHMIC-CAPTURE", "bisalu": { "proofs": [], "summary": "Evaluate tangible outputs: institutions, publications, tools, jobs, infrastructure, laws, companies and local capabilities." }, "critical_flags_uncertainties": [ "adjacence fondations/think tanks \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier", "amplification externe disproportionn\u00e9e", "philanthropie/visibilit\u00e9 peut masquer d\u00e9pendance", "contradiction discours-actions", "effet n\u00e9gatif sur capacit\u00e9s populaires", "affaiblissement des protections populaires", "d\u00e9pendance strat\u00e9gique renforc\u00e9e" ], "nsiku": { "claims": [], "summary": "Evaluate rule, accountability, anti-capture boundaries and discourse-action consistency." }, "nzola": { "claims": [], "summary": "Evaluate protection of people, dignity, education, health, social repair and non-fracture." }, "profile_type": "seed_or_database_profile", "references": [], "score_note": "Starter profile. Ranking must move through evidence upload, ORCID/imported records, verified public actions and reviewer approval; not through popularity or pressure.", "source_needs": [ "reference documents", "public actions", "financial/funding sources", "right-of-reply where relevant" ], "title": "Social media algorithmic capture and political manipulation" }, "evidence_strength": 50, "name": "Social media algorithmic capture and political manipulation", "positive_components": { "A1": 0, "A10": 0, "A2": 0, "A3": 0, "A4": 0, "A5": 0, "A6": 0, "A7": 0, "A8": 0, "A9": 50 }, "positive_score": 3, "red_flags": [ "adjacence fondations/think tanks \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier", "amplification externe disproportionn\u00e9e", "philanthropie/visibilit\u00e9 peut masquer d\u00e9pendance", "contradiction discours-actions", "effet n\u00e9gatif sur capacit\u00e9s populaires", "affaiblissement des protections populaires", "d\u00e9pendance strat\u00e9gique renforc\u00e9e" ], "risk_components": { "R1": 89, "R10": 84, "R11": 89, "R2": 79, "R3": 79, "R4": 89, "R5": 89, "R6": 84, "R7": 74, "R8": 79, "R9": 84 }, "role_label": { "code": "capture_threat", "label": "Menace / capture-risk \u00e9lev\u00e9" }, "score": 0, "score_explanation": "Starter profile. Ranking must move through evidence upload, ORCID/imported records, verified public actions and reviewer approval; not through popularity or pressure.", "search_keywords": [ "Social media algorithmic capture and political manipulation", "Global / Afrique", "threat_capture_risk_practical", "threat" ], "source": "seed", "status": "prepublication_sources_needed", "summary": "Evidence-gated threat pattern. Not an enemy label; assesses repeatable dependency, extraction, fracture or capture mechanics.", "visibility": "public" }, { "capture_risk_score": 96, "category": "threat_capture_risk_practical", "class": { "label": "risque \u00e9lev\u00e9 de capture / contradiction", "tone": "red" }, "correction_pathway": "Corrections, counter-evidence, DOI/ISBN/URL links, publication records, ORCID/imported records and reviewer notes can update this profile through the backend. Public pages do not reveal who contributes.", "country": "Afrique", "entity_id": "ACT-THREAT-FOREIGN-MINING-OFFTAKE-LOCKS", "entity_type": "deal_or_agreement", "evidence_profile": { "actor_id": "ACT-THREAT-FOREIGN-MINING-OFFTAKE-LOCKS", "bisalu": { "proofs": [], "summary": "Evaluate tangible outputs: institutions, publications, tools, jobs, infrastructure, laws, companies and local capabilities." }, "critical_flags_uncertainties": [ "adjacence fondations/think tanks \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier", "amplification externe disproportionn\u00e9e", "philanthropie/visibilit\u00e9 peut masquer d\u00e9pendance", "contradiction discours-actions", "effet n\u00e9gatif sur capacit\u00e9s populaires", "affaiblissement des protections populaires", "d\u00e9pendance strat\u00e9gique renforc\u00e9e" ], "nsiku": { "claims": [], "summary": "Evaluate rule, accountability, anti-capture boundaries and discourse-action consistency." }, "nzola": { "claims": [], "summary": "Evaluate protection of people, dignity, education, health, social repair and non-fracture." }, "profile_type": "seed_or_database_profile", "references": [], "score_note": "Starter profile. Ranking must move through evidence upload, ORCID/imported records, verified public actions and reviewer approval; not through popularity or pressure.", "source_needs": [ "reference documents", "public actions", "financial/funding sources", "right-of-reply where relevant" ], "title": "Foreign mining offtake and pre-export lock-in clauses" }, "evidence_strength": 55, "name": "Foreign mining offtake and pre-export lock-in clauses", "positive_components": { "A1": 0, "A10": 0, "A2": 0, "A3": 0, "A4": 0, "A5": 0, "A6": 0, "A7": 0, "A8": 0, "A9": 55 }, "positive_score": 3, "red_flags": [ "adjacence fondations/think tanks \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier", "amplification externe disproportionn\u00e9e", "philanthropie/visibilit\u00e9 peut masquer d\u00e9pendance", "contradiction discours-actions", "effet n\u00e9gatif sur capacit\u00e9s populaires", "affaiblissement des protections populaires", "d\u00e9pendance strat\u00e9gique renforc\u00e9e" ], "risk_components": { "R1": 100, "R10": 96, "R11": 100, "R2": 91, "R3": 91, "R4": 100, "R5": 100, "R6": 96, "R7": 86, "R8": 91, "R9": 96 }, "role_label": { "code": "capture_threat", "label": "Menace / capture-risk \u00e9lev\u00e9" }, "score": 0, "score_explanation": "Starter profile. Ranking must move through evidence upload, ORCID/imported records, verified public actions and reviewer approval; not through popularity or pressure.", "search_keywords": [ "Foreign mining offtake and pre-export lock-in clauses", "Afrique", "threat_capture_risk_practical", "threat" ], "source": "seed", "status": "prepublication_sources_needed", "summary": "Evidence-gated threat pattern. Not an enemy label; assesses repeatable dependency, extraction, fracture or capture mechanics.", "visibility": "public" }, { "capture_risk_score": 78, "category": "threat_capture_risk_practical", "class": { "label": "risque \u00e9lev\u00e9 de capture / contradiction", "tone": "red" }, "correction_pathway": "Corrections, counter-evidence, DOI/ISBN/URL links, publication records, ORCID/imported records and reviewer notes can update this profile through the backend. Public pages do not reveal who contributes.", "country": "Global / Afrique", "entity_id": "ACT-THREAT-EXTERNAL-ACADEMIC-GATEKEEPING", "entity_type": "think_tank", "evidence_profile": { "actor_id": "ACT-THREAT-EXTERNAL-ACADEMIC-GATEKEEPING", "bisalu": { "proofs": [], "summary": "Evaluate tangible outputs: institutions, publications, tools, jobs, infrastructure, laws, companies and local capabilities." }, "critical_flags_uncertainties": [ "adjacence fondations/think tanks \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier", "philanthropie/visibilit\u00e9 peut masquer d\u00e9pendance", "contradiction discours-actions", "effet n\u00e9gatif sur capacit\u00e9s populaires", "affaiblissement des protections populaires", "d\u00e9pendance strat\u00e9gique renforc\u00e9e" ], "nsiku": { "claims": [], "summary": "Evaluate rule, accountability, anti-capture boundaries and discourse-action consistency." }, "nzola": { "claims": [], "summary": "Evaluate protection of people, dignity, education, health, social repair and non-fracture." }, "profile_type": "seed_or_database_profile", "references": [], "score_note": "Starter profile. Ranking must move through evidence upload, ORCID/imported records, verified public actions and reviewer approval; not through popularity or pressure.", "source_needs": [ "reference documents", "public actions", "financial/funding sources", "right-of-reply where relevant" ], "title": "External academic gatekeeping and prestige-dependency pattern" }, "evidence_strength": 50, "name": "External academic gatekeeping and prestige-dependency pattern", "positive_components": { "A1": 0, "A10": 0, "A2": 0, "A3": 0, "A4": 0, "A5": 0, "A6": 0, "A7": 0, "A8": 0, "A9": 50 }, "positive_score": 3, "red_flags": [ "adjacence fondations/think tanks \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier", "philanthropie/visibilit\u00e9 peut masquer d\u00e9pendance", "contradiction discours-actions", "effet n\u00e9gatif sur capacit\u00e9s populaires", "affaiblissement des protections populaires", "d\u00e9pendance strat\u00e9gique renforc\u00e9e" ], "risk_components": { "R1": 83, "R10": 78, "R11": 83, "R2": 73, "R3": 73, "R4": 83, "R5": 83, "R6": 78, "R7": 68, "R8": 73, "R9": 78 }, "role_label": { "code": "dependency_vector", "label": "Vecteur de d\u00e9pendance \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier" }, "score": 0, "score_explanation": "Starter profile. Ranking must move through evidence upload, ORCID/imported records, verified public actions and reviewer approval; not through popularity or pressure.", "search_keywords": [ "External academic gatekeeping and prestige-dependency pattern", "Global / Afrique", "threat_capture_risk_practical", "threat" ], "source": "seed", "status": "prepublication_sources_needed", "summary": "Evidence-gated threat pattern. Not an enemy label; assesses repeatable dependency, extraction, fracture or capture mechanics.", "visibility": "public" }, { "capture_risk_score": 80, "category": "threat_capture_risk_practical", "class": { "label": "risque \u00e9lev\u00e9 de capture / contradiction", "tone": "red" }, "correction_pathway": "Corrections, counter-evidence, DOI/ISBN/URL links, publication records, ORCID/imported records and reviewer notes can update this profile through the backend. Public pages do not reveal who contributes.", "country": "Global / Afrique", "entity_id": "ACT-THREAT-FOREIGN-MEDIA-CONFLICT-FRAMING", "entity_type": "media", "evidence_profile": { "actor_id": "ACT-THREAT-FOREIGN-MEDIA-CONFLICT-FRAMING", "bisalu": { "proofs": [], "summary": "Evaluate tangible outputs: institutions, publications, tools, jobs, infrastructure, laws, companies and local capabilities." }, "critical_flags_uncertainties": [ "adjacence fondations/think tanks \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier", "amplification externe disproportionn\u00e9e", "philanthropie/visibilit\u00e9 peut masquer d\u00e9pendance", "contradiction discours-actions", "effet n\u00e9gatif sur capacit\u00e9s populaires", "affaiblissement des protections populaires", "d\u00e9pendance strat\u00e9gique renforc\u00e9e" ], "nsiku": { "claims": [], "summary": "Evaluate rule, accountability, anti-capture boundaries and discourse-action consistency." }, "nzola": { "claims": [], "summary": "Evaluate protection of people, dignity, education, health, social repair and non-fracture." }, "profile_type": "seed_or_database_profile", "references": [], "score_note": "Starter profile. Ranking must move through evidence upload, ORCID/imported records, verified public actions and reviewer approval; not through popularity or pressure.", "source_needs": [ "reference documents", "public actions", "financial/funding sources", "right-of-reply where relevant" ], "title": "Foreign media conflict framing and fracture amplification" }, "evidence_strength": 48, "name": "Foreign media conflict framing and fracture amplification", "positive_components": { "A1": 0, "A10": 0, "A2": 0, "A3": 0, "A4": 0, "A5": 0, "A6": 0, "A7": 0, "A8": 0, "A9": 48 }, "positive_score": 2, "red_flags": [ "adjacence fondations/think tanks \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier", "amplification externe disproportionn\u00e9e", "philanthropie/visibilit\u00e9 peut masquer d\u00e9pendance", "contradiction discours-actions", "effet n\u00e9gatif sur capacit\u00e9s populaires", "affaiblissement des protections populaires", "d\u00e9pendance strat\u00e9gique renforc\u00e9e" ], "risk_components": { "R1": 85, "R10": 80, "R11": 85, "R2": 75, "R3": 75, "R4": 85, "R5": 85, "R6": 80, "R7": 70, "R8": 75, "R9": 80 }, "role_label": { "code": "dependency_vector", "label": "Vecteur de d\u00e9pendance \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier" }, "score": 0, "score_explanation": "Starter profile. Ranking must move through evidence upload, ORCID/imported records, verified public actions and reviewer approval; not through popularity or pressure.", "search_keywords": [ "Foreign media conflict framing and fracture amplification", "Global / Afrique", "threat_capture_risk_practical", "threat" ], "source": "seed", "status": "prepublication_sources_needed", "summary": "Evidence-gated threat pattern. Not an enemy label; assesses repeatable dependency, extraction, fracture or capture mechanics.", "visibility": "public" }, { "capture_risk_score": 68, "category": "education_dependency_review", "class": { "label": "faible contribution ou action contraire \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier", "tone": "red" }, "correction_pathway": "Corrections, counter-evidence, DOI/ISBN/URL links, publication records, ORCID/imported records and reviewer notes can update this profile through the backend. Public pages do not reveal who contributes.", "country": "Ghana / transnational", "entity_id": "ACT-UNIV-ASHESI-MASTERCARD-RISK", "entity_type": "case_pattern", "evidence_profile": { "actor_id": "ACT-UNIV-ASHESI-MASTERCARD-RISK", "bisalu": { "proofs": [], "summary": "Evaluate tangible outputs: institutions, publications, tools, jobs, infrastructure, laws, companies and local capabilities." }, "critical_flags_uncertainties": [ "contradiction discours-actions", "effet n\u00e9gatif sur capacit\u00e9s populaires", "d\u00e9pendance strat\u00e9gique renforc\u00e9e" ], "nsiku": { "claims": [], "summary": "Evaluate rule, accountability, anti-capture boundaries and discourse-action consistency." }, "nzola": { "claims": [], "summary": "Evaluate protection of people, dignity, education, health, social repair and non-fracture." }, "profile_type": "seed_or_database_profile", "references": [], "score_note": "Starter profile. Ranking must move through evidence upload, ORCID/imported records, verified public actions and reviewer approval; not through popularity or pressure.", "source_needs": [ "reference documents", "public actions", "financial/funding sources", "right-of-reply where relevant" ], "title": "Ashesi / external scholarship-finance dependency review" }, "evidence_strength": 45, "name": "Ashesi / external scholarship-finance dependency review", "positive_components": { "A1": 0, "A10": 0, "A2": 0, "A3": 0, "A4": 0, "A5": 1, "A6": 1, "A7": 0, "A8": 0, "A9": 45 }, "positive_score": 3, "red_flags": [ "contradiction discours-actions", "effet n\u00e9gatif sur capacit\u00e9s populaires", "d\u00e9pendance strat\u00e9gique renforc\u00e9e" ], "risk_components": { "R1": 73, "R10": 68, "R11": 73, "R2": 63, "R3": 63, "R4": 73, "R5": 73, "R6": 68, "R7": 58, "R8": 63, "R9": 68 }, "role_label": { "code": "dependency_vector", "label": "Vecteur de d\u00e9pendance \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier" }, "score": 0, "score_explanation": "Starter profile. Ranking must move through evidence upload, ORCID/imported records, verified public actions and reviewer approval; not through popularity or pressure.", "search_keywords": [ "Ashesi / external scholarship-finance dependency review", "Ghana / transnational", "education_dependency_review", "threat" ], "source": "seed", "status": "prepublication_sources_needed", "summary": "Pattern profile to ensure external scholarship/foundation models are assessed for capability transfer rather than prestige alone.", "visibility": "public" } ], "module": { "publication_discipline": { "protected_sources": "Raw evidence, witness identity, exact sensitive locations and protected contributor details are not exposed in the public layer.", "red_rule": "Red does not mean final legal guilt. Red means insufficient demonstrated compliance, transparency, responsibility, or public-interest assurance.", "right_of_reply": "Right of reply, correction and documented update remain part of the publication discipline.", "schema": "cssp-public-disclaimer-v1", "separation_rule": "Accusations must be separated from evidence, analysis, recommendation, and confirmed finding." }, "purpose": "Monitor capture, coercion, retaliation risk, institutional failure and population-protection signals through evidence-gated public intelligence.", "risk_indicators": [ { "code": "THR-01", "label": "External-interest compliance", "meaning": "Institutional decisions systematically favor external interests over public-interest duties." }, { "code": "THR-02", "label": "Retaliation or intimidation", "meaning": "Witnesses, researchers, journalists, public servants or communities face pressure after raising public-interest concerns." }, { "code": "THR-03", "label": "Legal-pressure misuse", "meaning": "Defamation or legal threats appear designed to suppress evidence-gated public accountability." }, { "code": "THR-04", "label": "Institutional failure", "meaning": "State or organizational mechanisms repeatedly fail to protect people, records, resources or rights." }, { "code": "THR-05", "label": "Public abuse reporting pattern", "meaning": "Multiple reports converge around a pattern requiring review, not automatic conviction." } ], "schema": "cssp-threat-capture-protection-module-v1", "scope": [ "foreign capture", "state compliance with external interests", "intimidation and retaliation risk", "legal pressure/defamation risk", "public abuse reporting", "institutional failure", "population protection monitoring" ], "title": "Threats, capture and population protection module" }, "note": "Threats are documented capture-risk patterns, not personal enemy labels.", "publication_discipline": { "protected_sources": "Raw evidence, witness identity, exact sensitive locations and protected contributor details are not exposed in the public layer.", "red_rule": "Red does not mean final legal guilt. Red means insufficient demonstrated compliance, transparency, responsibility, or public-interest assurance.", "right_of_reply": "Right of reply, correction and documented update remain part of the publication discipline.", "schema": "cssp-public-disclaimer-v1", "separation_rule": "Accusations must be separated from evidence, analysis, recommendation, and confirmed finding." }, "schema": "cssp-threats-public-export-v1" }