{
  "count": 13,
  "items": [
    {
      "evidence_state": "pattern_template",
      "public_note": "This template does not accuse a named actor. Named records require competent evidence and review.",
      "record_id": "SPONSORSHIP-PATTERN-001",
      "record_type": "threat_pattern",
      "region": "Pan-African / global interface",
      "required_sources": [
        "official sanctions or terrorism designation records",
        "court filings or public investigation records",
        "financial/funding or logistics trail where lawful",
        "verified communications or public statements",
        "right-of-reply or official response where safe and relevant"
      ],
      "review_requirements": [
        "legal review",
        "source-protection review",
        "right-of-reply assessment",
        "retaliation-risk assessment"
      ],
      "risk_level": "critical",
      "status": "published",
      "summary": "Tracks claims that a state, intelligence network, company, patronage structure or proxy channel materially supports armed groups, terrorism-enabling networks, destabilization, trafficking, recruitment, financing or logistical assistance.",
      "title": "Alleged or documented sponsorship of armed groups / terrorism-enabling networks",
      "visibility": "public"
    },
    {
      "evidence_state": "pattern_template",
      "public_note": "Survivor and child protection override public curiosity. No witness names, exact locations or raw testimony should appear in public exports.",
      "record_id": "BASE-ABUSE-PATTERN-001",
      "record_type": "protected_population_abuse_pattern",
      "region": "Host communities near military/security installations",
      "required_sources": [
        "child-protection and survivor-support records where lawfully shareable",
        "official inquiry reports or court records",
        "UN/AU/NGO monitoring where corroborated",
        "civilian protection chronology",
        "base agreement/SOFA clauses and accountability mechanisms",
        "sealed/offline source-handler evidence where needed"
      ],
      "review_requirements": [
        "child-protection review",
        "legal review",
        "source-protection review",
        "redaction review",
        "psychosocial harm review"
      ],
      "risk_level": "critical",
      "status": "published",
      "summary": "Tracks allegations and documented patterns of child abuse, sexual exploitation, trafficking, coercion, environmental harm, impunity or intimidation linked to foreign or domestic military bases, peacekeeping deployments, private security sites or security-cooperation installations.",
      "title": "Protected-population abuse around military bases and deployments",
      "visibility": "public"
    },
    {
      "evidence_state": "source_needed",
      "public_note": "Security cooperation is not automatically abusive; the test is accountability, legal control, exit rights, civilian protection and public-interest outcomes.",
      "record_id": "MILITARY-COOP-CAPTURE-001",
      "record_type": "action_dossier_template",
      "region": "Africa / Caribbean / diaspora states",
      "required_sources": [
        "official communications and treaty texts",
        "military presence / cooperation agreement clauses",
        "public statements and verified transcripts",
        "documented sanctions, pressure or interference events",
        "civilian protection data and security incident chronology",
        "right-of-reply or official response record"
      ],
      "review_requirements": [
        "legal/treaty review",
        "civilian protection review",
        "anti-capture review",
        "right-of-reply assessment"
      ],
      "risk_level": "high",
      "status": "published",
      "summary": "Assesses whether military presence, cooperation clauses, training programs, intelligence-sharing, security assistance, drone access, basing rights, or contractor arrangements weaken sovereign decision-making or civilian protection.",
      "title": "Military cooperation clauses and sovereign capability risk",
      "visibility": "public"
    },
    {
      "evidence_state": "pattern_template",
      "public_note": "This is a discourse-pattern object, not a named-person finding unless claim-source-review-right-of-reply is complete.",
      "record_id": "INTEL-PROXY-NARRATIVE-001",
      "record_type": "information_pressure_pattern",
      "region": "Pan-African public sphere",
      "required_sources": [
        "public statements and verified transcripts",
        "funding/ownership or sponsorship disclosures",
        "content chronology and repetition analysis",
        "counter-evidence and right-of-reply record",
        "expert review by historians, psychologists/psychiatrists and media analysts"
      ],
      "review_requirements": [
        "media-forensics review",
        "historical review",
        "psychological framing review",
        "right-of-reply assessment"
      ],
      "risk_level": "high",
      "status": "published",
      "summary": "Tracks coordinated narratives that excuse, minimize, normalize or shield colonial/imperial harm, redirect grievance inward, or blame affected populations while hiding external pressure, sponsorship or coercive interests.",
      "title": "Information sponsorship, proxy media and grievance redirection",
      "visibility": "public"
    },
    {
      "evidence_state": "pattern_template",
      "public_note": "Company, owner and subcontractor naming requires source-linked evidence and legal review.",
      "record_id": "CONTRACTOR-ABUSE-CHAIN-001",
      "record_type": "contractor_risk_pattern",
      "region": "Resource zones, conflict zones, borderlands, ports and infrastructure corridors",
      "required_sources": [
        "contracts, beneficial ownership and subcontractor records",
        "court or grievance mechanism records",
        "incident chronology and victim/survivor-protection protocol",
        "buyer or parent-company due-diligence record",
        "right-of-reply record"
      ],
      "review_requirements": [
        "corporate-chain review",
        "legal review",
        "source-protection review",
        "right-of-reply assessment"
      ],
      "risk_level": "critical",
      "status": "published",
      "summary": "Maps allegations or documented records involving private security actors, subcontractors, mine/port/logistics guards, training companies or armed intermediaries linked to intimidation, abuse, illegal detention, trafficking, forced displacement or suppression of local accountability.",
      "title": "Private military/security contractor abuse and impunity chain",
      "visibility": "public"
    },
    {
      "evidence_state": "pattern_template",
      "public_note": "Do not publish worker names or case details without survivor-safe review.",
      "record_id": "GULF-LABOR-ABUSE-PATTERN-001",
      "record_type": "labor_abuse_pattern",
      "region": "Africa-Gulf migration corridors",
      "required_sources": [
        "worker-protection/ILO reports",
        "court records",
        "consular complaints",
        "recruitment contracts",
        "sealed testimony where safe"
      ],
      "review_requirements": [
        "labor-law review",
        "source-protection review",
        "psychosocial/survivor review",
        "right-of-reply assessment"
      ],
      "risk_level": "critical",
      "status": "published",
      "summary": "Tracks African worker exploitation, wage theft, passport seizure, coercive recruitment, abuse and trafficking indicators linked to labor sponsorship systems or recruitment chains.",
      "title": "Gulf labor sponsorship / migrant-worker abuse pattern",
      "visibility": "public"
    },
    {
      "evidence_state": "source_needed",
      "public_note": "High-risk classification; named records require competent public evidence or sealed legal review.",
      "record_id": "STATE-SPONSORSHIP-ARMED-GROUPS-REGIONAL-001",
      "record_type": "sponsorship_inquiry_template",
      "region": "Sahel / Great Lakes / Horn / Libya-Sudan interface",
      "required_sources": [
        "sanctions/designation records",
        "UN panels of experts",
        "court filings",
        "financial/logistics trails",
        "verified statements",
        "right-of-reply/official response"
      ],
      "review_requirements": [
        "legal review",
        "source-protection review",
        "retaliation-risk review",
        "regional security expert review"
      ],
      "risk_level": "critical",
      "status": "published",
      "summary": "Template for mapping alleged or documented state/intelligence/logistics support to armed groups, proxy militias, trafficking networks or destabilization campaigns.",
      "title": "State or intelligence-linked sponsorship of armed groups — regional template",
      "visibility": "public"
    },
    {
      "evidence_state": "pattern_template",
      "public_note": "Survivor protection and child-safety rules override public disclosure.",
      "record_id": "PEACEKEEPING-ABUSE-ACCOUNTABILITY-001",
      "record_type": "protected_population_abuse_pattern",
      "region": "Host communities near deployments",
      "required_sources": [
        "UN/AU inquiry reports",
        "court/disciplinary records",
        "survivor services data where lawful",
        "SOFA/immunity clauses",
        "redress and compensation records"
      ],
      "review_requirements": [
        "child-protection review",
        "legal review",
        "redaction review",
        "psychosocial harm review"
      ],
      "risk_level": "critical",
      "status": "published",
      "summary": "Tracks sexual exploitation, child abuse, trafficking, impunity, jurisdiction gaps and remedy failures linked to peacekeeping or security deployments.",
      "title": "Peacekeeping/security deployment abuse and accountability gap pattern",
      "visibility": "public"
    },
    {
      "evidence_state": "pattern_template",
      "public_note": "Named records require contracts, public statements, legal authority and source-protection review.",
      "record_id": "CONTRACTOR-PARAMILITARY-RECOLONIZATION-RISK-001",
      "record_type": "contractor_risk_pattern",
      "region": "Conflict/resource zones",
      "required_sources": [
        "contracts/MOUs",
        "public statements/transcripts",
        "constitutional authority analysis",
        "human-rights records",
        "command/control clauses",
        "right-of-reply"
      ],
      "review_requirements": [
        "constitutional review",
        "legal review",
        "source-protection review",
        "civilian-protection review"
      ],
      "risk_level": "critical",
      "status": "published",
      "summary": "Tracks contractor proposals, paramilitary capacity, resource-security packages, immunity, command ambiguity and recolonization rhetoric or objectives.",
      "title": "Private military contractor / paramilitary recolonization risk pattern",
      "visibility": "public"
    },
    {
      "evidence_state": "pattern_template",
      "public_note": "Security assistance is assessed by end-use, accountability, civilian harm and remedy, not ideology.",
      "record_id": "ARMS-TRANSFER-CIVILIAN-HARM-001",
      "record_type": "arms_transfer_risk_pattern",
      "region": "Africa / external suppliers",
      "required_sources": [
        "arms transfer records",
        "end-use monitoring",
        "incident chronology",
        "human-rights reports",
        "supplier/state response"
      ],
      "review_requirements": [
        "security review",
        "human-rights review",
        "legal review"
      ],
      "risk_level": "high",
      "status": "published",
      "summary": "Tracks arms, drones, surveillance tools, training or security assistance that may enable civilian harm, repression or armed-group escalation.",
      "title": "Arms transfer / security assistance civilian-harm pattern",
      "visibility": "public"
    },
    {
      "evidence_state": "pattern_template",
      "public_note": "Do not expose victims, devices or technical indicators that create retaliation risk.",
      "record_id": "SURVEILLANCE-EXPORT-REPRESSION-001",
      "record_type": "digital_abuse_pattern",
      "region": "Africa / vendor states",
      "required_sources": [
        "forensic reports",
        "procurement records",
        "court/inquiry records",
        "victim-safe incident logs",
        "vendor/state response"
      ],
      "review_requirements": [
        "cybersecurity review",
        "source-protection review",
        "legal review"
      ],
      "risk_level": "high",
      "status": "published",
      "summary": "Tracks spyware, lawful-intercept, biometric or surveillance exports used to target journalists, opposition, activists, unions or communities.",
      "title": "Surveillance export and repression-enabling pattern",
      "visibility": "public"
    },
    {
      "evidence_state": "source_needed",
      "public_note": "Requires careful separation of public contract terms, allegations and sealed evidence.",
      "record_id": "RESOURCE-FOR-SECURITY-BARTER-001",
      "record_type": "resource_security_capture_pattern",
      "region": "Resource/conflict zones",
      "required_sources": [
        "contract terms",
        "beneficial ownership",
        "security assistance records",
        "resource export records",
        "parliamentary/judicial review"
      ],
      "review_requirements": [
        "legal review",
        "resource-economics review",
        "security review"
      ],
      "risk_level": "critical",
      "status": "published",
      "summary": "Tracks deals where mineral, oil, port, land or infrastructure rights are exchanged for security assistance, political protection or armed support without public accountability.",
      "title": "Resource-for-security barter and coercive protection pattern",
      "visibility": "public"
    },
    {
      "evidence_state": "pattern_template",
      "public_note": "Protect beneficiaries and aid workers; public claims require strong evidence.",
      "record_id": "HUMANITARIAN-CORRIDOR-INTELLIGENCE-OVERLAP-001",
      "record_type": "humanitarian_intelligence_overlap",
      "region": "Crisis zones",
      "required_sources": [
        "aid contracts",
        "data-sharing policies",
        "field incident reports",
        "military/humanitarian coordination records",
        "reviewer notes"
      ],
      "review_requirements": [
        "humanitarian law review",
        "source-protection review",
        "data-protection review"
      ],
      "risk_level": "high",
      "status": "published",
      "summary": "Tracks cases where humanitarian access, aid logistics, contractors or data systems may overlap with intelligence collection, military targeting or population-control risks.",
      "title": "Humanitarian corridor / intelligence overlap risk pattern",
      "visibility": "public"
    }
  ],
  "policy": {
    "evidence_states": [
      "pattern_template",
      "allegation_received",
      "source_needed",
      "source_linked",
      "documented_tie",
      "right_of_reply_pending",
      "reviewed",
      "confirmed_public_record",
      "sealed"
    ],
    "legal_boundary": [
      "Separate allegation, risk signal, documented tie, sponsorship evidence, analysis, recommendation and confirmed finding.",
      "Named adverse profiles require source-linked evidence, reviewer approval, legal/source-protection review and right-of-reply discipline where safe and appropriate.",
      "Terrorism-sponsorship labels are high-risk legal classifications and must be treated as alleged/provisional unless supported by competent public records or official designations.",
      "Protected-population abuse around military bases, deployments or security installations must use survivor-protection, child-protection and anti-retaliation protocols before publication."
    ],
    "public_boundary": "The public layer may describe patterns, source requirements, risk indicators and reviewed findings. It must not publish raw witness identities, protected source trails, exact sensitive locations, sealed evidence or unreviewed allegations as facts.",
    "public_upload_rule": "No sensitive uploads on public forms. High-risk material goes through approved secure-intake channels only.",
    "purpose": "Track high-risk patterns involving alleged or documented support to armed groups, coercive external pressure, military-basing abuses, intelligence/security sponsorship, and protected-population harm.",
    "schema": "cssp-sponsorship-abuse-policy-v1",
    "source_classes": [
      "official sanctions/designation records",
      "court filings, judgments or public investigative records",
      "parliamentary or official inquiry reports",
      "treaties, basing agreements, SOFAs and military-cooperation clauses",
      "verified transcripts, speeches and public communications",
      "civilian casualty, child-protection and gender-based-violence datasets",
      "UN/AU/regional monitoring reports",
      "credible investigative journalism with corroboration",
      "right-of-reply or official response record",
      "sealed source-handler file for non-public evidence"
    ],
    "title": "Sponsors, documented ties and protected-population abuse risk"
  },
  "schema": "cssp-sponsors-abuse-v60-v1",
  "warning": "High-risk allegations require source-linked evidence, legal/source-protection review, redaction, and right-of-reply discipline where safe and appropriate."
}