{
  "likely_attacks": [
    "defamation threats",
    "host-pressure or takedown pressure",
    "false submissions to poison records",
    "bot/reputation campaigns",
    "attempts to identify protected contributors",
    "requests for raw evidence that would expose witnesses",
    "coordinated correction abuse",
    "infiltration attempts",
    "claims that the platform is an enemy list"
  ],
  "public_position": "Good-faith correction is welcome. Pressure, threats, bribery, fraud, witness exposure, coordinated manipulation and reputation laundering are disqualifiers and may become transparency signals after review and redaction.",
  "required_controls": [
    "public disclaimers on every high-risk page",
    "source-protection review before publication",
    "admin IP/VPN allowlisting",
    "rate limiting and WAF/CDN protection",
    "signed public snapshots",
    "audit logs and hash chain",
    "sealed evidence handling",
    "bad-faith pressure logging",
    "emergency review/takedown workflow",
    "static mirror fallback"
  ],
  "schema": "paso-hostile-response-protocol-v1",
  "summary": "PASO expects legal, reputational, technical and infiltration pressure. The answer is not bravado; it is discipline, evidence, redaction, process and decentralization.",
  "title": "Hostile-response protocol"
}