{ "schema": "PASO-ABUSE-PATTERN-HEATMAP-v34", "updated": "2026-06-02", "module": "military-abuse-heatmap", "public_title": "Abuse Pattern Heatmap", "public_boundary": "Public country/regional indicators only. No exact sensitive locations, protected witnesses, raw evidence or confidential annexes.", "method_note": "V33 completes the generated starter section with named humanitarian and protection cases. PASO references UN OCHA HDX and related datasets, but does not treat curated datasets as the full reality. Victims' testimonies, survivor accounts, local journalists, health workers, aid workers, community reports and protected witnesses remain necessary evidence layers, especially where access is obstructed or powerful actors suppress investigation.", "count": 151, "items": [ { "record_id": "HEATMAP-DRC", "title": "Democratic Republic of Congo — military, proxy, resource and civilian-protection risk", "country": "DRC", "region": "Central Africa", "lat": -2.879866, "lon": 23.656378, "status": "public-risk profile", "overall_risk_score": 88, "evidence_strength": 72, "trust_index": 22, "presence_type": [ "foreign forces", "proxy armed groups", "resource security", "state forces", "private security" ], "abuse_types": [ "civilian harm", "sexual violence risk", "child protection", "resource conflict", "detention/intimidation", "foreign-force opacity" ], "chronology": "1996-present", "plain_diagnosis": "The DRC combines conflict minerals, foreign/proxy armed actors, weak civilian protection, contested security cooperation and high population vulnerability. The public question is not only who commits abuse, but whether agreements, forces and command chains create enforceable protection, remedy and accountability.", "risk_logic": "When conflict, minerals, foreign security actors and weak remedies coexist over decades, the default public-protection posture is distrust until clear command responsibility, safeguards, jurisdiction, complaint routes and reparations mechanisms are proven.", "safe_actions": [ "Request publication of security agreements and immunity clauses", "Ask parliament/professional bodies to audit foreign-force and contractor safeguards", "Preserve public reports and court records", "Route strongest atrocity-crime clusters through legal screening before ICC/UN use" ], "demand_origins": [], "pattern_flags": [], "source_links": [], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-UAE-SUDAN-RSF-PROXY-RISK", "title": "Sudan / UAE-linked RSF proxy-risk pattern", "country": "Sudan / UAE", "region": "East Africa / Gulf", "lat": 15.500654, "lon": 32.559899, "status": "source-linked review needed", "overall_risk_score": 91, "evidence_strength": 68, "trust_index": 18, "presence_type": [ "proxy armed group", "foreign sponsor risk", "gold/resource networks", "regional power projection", "paramilitary / PMC / auxiliary force" ], "abuse_types": [ "civilian harm", "mass displacement", "sexual violence risk", "resource capture", "proxy violence" ], "chronology": "2013-present", "plain_diagnosis": "The Sudan/RSF pattern should be treated as a high-risk proxy and resource-conflict profile. Public analysis must separate confirmed supply chains, allegations, denials, sanctions, gold networks, diplomatic positions and humanitarian outcomes.", "risk_logic": "Where a foreign-aligned armed actor is tied to resource flows and mass civilian harm, plausible deniability is itself a risk condition. Trust rises only with transparent supply-chain controls, cessation evidence, independent investigation and remedy.", "safe_actions": [ "Map public sanctions and UN reports", "Track gold and logistics allegations separately from confirmed findings", "Ask regional bodies for independent civilian-protection review", "Avoid naming protected witnesses publicly" ], "demand_origins": [], "pattern_flags": [ "source-origin discipline required", "victim/community testimony threshold" ], "source_links": [], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-CAR", "title": "Central African Republic — foreign security, contractor and civilian-abuse risk", "country": "Central African Republic", "region": "Central Africa", "lat": 6.611111, "lon": 20.939444, "status": "public-risk profile", "overall_risk_score": 84, "evidence_strength": 66, "trust_index": 26, "presence_type": [ "foreign security actor", "contractor network", "state forces", "resource security", "paramilitary / PMC / auxiliary force" ], "abuse_types": [ "civilian harm", "mercenary/contractor opacity", "resource security", "impunity risk" ], "chronology": "2013-present", "plain_diagnosis": "CAR illustrates how weak institutions, foreign security dependency, contractor opacity and resource insecurity can produce a civilian-protection gap even where authorities frame cooperation as stabilization.", "risk_logic": "Foreign security support is not automatically illegitimate, but it becomes high-risk when command responsibility, jurisdiction, complaint channels, contract terms and civilian remedies are opaque.", "safe_actions": [ "Request public contract and status-of-forces terms", "Separate allegations, UN findings and official denials", "Preserve witness safety by using public reports only", "Demand independent monitoring and complaint channels" ], "demand_origins": [], "pattern_flags": [ "source-origin discipline required", "victim/community testimony threshold" ], "source_links": [], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-SOMALIA", "title": "Somalia — counterterrorism, foreign-base and civilian-harm risk", "country": "Somalia", "region": "Horn of Africa", "lat": 5.152149, "lon": 46.199616, "status": "public-risk profile", "overall_risk_score": 82, "evidence_strength": 62, "trust_index": 30, "presence_type": [ "counterterrorism operations", "foreign bases", "drone/air operations", "training missions" ], "abuse_types": [ "civilian casualty risk", "detention risk", "sovereignty dependency", "accountability gaps" ], "chronology": "2001-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Somalia should be read as a counterterrorism-accountability profile: foreign military operations, drone/air activity, training and fragile institutions require stronger civilian-casualty disclosure and remedy mechanisms.", "risk_logic": "Counterterrorism cannot be a blanket exemption from civilian protection. The risk remains high where casualty assessment, legal basis, host-state consent and remedies are difficult for the public to verify.", "safe_actions": [ "Track public casualty reports and official acknowledgments", "Request legal basis and host-state consent records", "Demand civilian-remedy mechanisms", "Avoid exposing local informants or vulnerable communities" ], "demand_origins": [], "pattern_flags": [], "source_links": [], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-FRANCE-AFRICAN-BASE-WITHDRAWALS", "title": "France — African base withdrawals and residual military influence", "country": "France / African states", "region": "Sahel / West / Central Africa", "lat": 14.497401, "lon": -14.452362, "status": "source-linked profile", "overall_risk_score": 86, "evidence_strength": 74, "trust_index": 18, "presence_type": [ "foreign bases", "defence agreements", "training missions", "intelligence cooperation", "information pressure" ], "abuse_types": [ "sovereignty pressure", "civilian-protection failure", "immunity/jurisdiction risk", "media laundering", "residual influence" ], "chronology": "1960-present", "plain_diagnosis": "France’s Africa military profile must track both formal withdrawals and residual influence: agreements, bases, training, intelligence ties, immunity, corporate interests and narrative pressure.", "risk_logic": "A withdrawal announcement does not prove structural exit. Trust requires public agreement texts, clause-level review, base closure verification, no proxy replacement, and absence of retaliation/media-laundering pressure.", "safe_actions": [ "Compare treaty texts with actual base status", "Track residual advisers/contractors/intelligence roles", "Separate French public from French state policy", "Document media pressure and official denials with sources" ], "demand_origins": [], "pattern_flags": [], "source_links": [], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-US-AFRICOM", "title": "United States — AFRICOM footprint and security-dependency risk", "country": "United States / African states", "region": "Continental Africa", "lat": 11.825138, "lon": 42.590275, "status": "source-linked profile", "overall_risk_score": 85, "evidence_strength": 72, "trust_index": 20, "presence_type": [ "AFRICOM footprint", "bases/access sites", "training", "counterterrorism", "biosecurity/security cooperation" ], "abuse_types": [ "sovereignty dependency", "civilian casualty risk", "detention/transfer risk", "data/biosecurity risk", "legal opacity" ], "chronology": "2007-present", "plain_diagnosis": "The U.S. profile should focus on footprint, access agreements, counterterrorism, training, data/security cooperation and whether host populations receive enforceable protections and remedies.", "risk_logic": "Security cooperation with a superpower is high-risk by default where access sites, legal immunities, data/control rights, casualty assessments and remedies are not fully public and enforceable.", "safe_actions": [ "Request SOFA/access agreement clauses", "Track casualty and transfer allegations separately", "Demand public health/biosecurity safeguards", "Publish only public evidence and redacted legal questions" ], "demand_origins": [], "pattern_flags": [], "source_links": [], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-DJIBOUTI", "title": "Djibouti — multi-base concentration and sovereignty leverage risk", "country": "Djibouti", "region": "Horn of Africa / Red Sea", "lat": 11.825138, "lon": 42.590275, "status": "public-risk profile", "overall_risk_score": 78, "evidence_strength": 60, "trust_index": 32, "presence_type": [ "foreign bases", "port/logistics", "Red Sea chokepoint", "multi-state military presence" ], "abuse_types": [ "sovereignty leverage", "labor/community impact", "jurisdiction opacity", "strategic dependency" ], "chronology": "2001-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Djibouti concentrates multiple foreign military powers in a small strategic territory. The risk is leverage: public accountability must track land use, port/security deals, jurisdiction, labor impact and local consent.", "risk_logic": "A multi-base economy can create state revenue while reducing bargaining power and public control. Trust depends on transparent contracts, environmental/labor safeguards and local remedy routes.", "safe_actions": [ "Map base agreements and public budget dependency", "Request labor/environmental safeguards", "Track jurisdiction and incident procedures", "Use country-level markers, not sensitive exact locations" ], "demand_origins": [], "pattern_flags": [], "source_links": [], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-KENYA", "title": "Kenya — foreign facility, police/security cooperation and public-health sovereignty risk", "country": "Kenya", "region": "East Africa", "lat": 0.023559, "lon": 37.906193, "status": "public-risk profile", "overall_risk_score": 83, "evidence_strength": 70, "trust_index": 24, "presence_type": [ "foreign facility risk", "training/security cooperation", "police deployment", "public-health security" ], "abuse_types": [ "public-health risk", "court-order compliance", "protest/repression risk", "foreign-priority decision-making" ], "chronology": "2020-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Kenya’s risk profile now includes foreign-priority public-health and security decisions. The central issue is whether foreign requests can override court orders, medical warnings and population protection.", "risk_logic": "When a government admits or appears to prioritize a foreign partner’s request over local warnings, courts or public-health safeguards, the risk is not only technical; it is a sovereignty and duty-of-care problem.", "safe_actions": [ "Preserve court orders and public statements", "Ask medical associations for review", "Request risk mitigation and liability guarantees", "Route public concern through bar, health and rights bodies" ], "demand_origins": [], "pattern_flags": [], "source_links": [], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-MALI", "title": "Mali / AES — counterterrorism, foreign pressure and proxy-apology risk", "country": "Mali", "region": "Sahel", "lat": 17.570692, "lon": -3.996166, "status": "public-risk profile", "overall_risk_score": 80, "evidence_strength": 64, "trust_index": 30, "presence_type": [ "counterterrorism operations", "foreign pressure", "information warfare", "security partnerships" ], "abuse_types": [ "civilian harm", "terrorism-support allegation", "media laundering", "sanctions/diplomatic pressure", "proxy destabilization" ], "chronology": "2012-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Mali/AES should track both internal civilian-protection concerns and external destabilization narratives, including allegations that hostile states or media ecosystems launder or excuse armed-group violence.", "risk_logic": "Where a state facing armed groups is attacked through information pressure while alleged external support or apology for armed actors exists, the public standard should demand evidence, neutrality and non-support of terrorism from all outside actors.", "safe_actions": [ "Separate Mali state abuse claims from external support-to-armed-group claims", "Preserve public admissions and official accusations", "Ask international bodies for neutral investigation", "Avoid treating media narratives as proof without source chain" ], "demand_origins": [], "pattern_flags": [], "source_links": [], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-NIGER", "title": "Niger — base withdrawal, uranium/resource sovereignty and security-transition risk", "country": "Niger", "region": "Sahel", "lat": 17.607789, "lon": 8.081666, "status": "public-risk profile", "overall_risk_score": 78, "evidence_strength": 62, "trust_index": 34, "presence_type": [ "foreign base withdrawal", "uranium/resource control", "military transition", "counterterrorism" ], "abuse_types": [ "sovereignty leverage", "resource dependency", "civilian-protection risk", "sanctions pressure" ], "chronology": "2010-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Niger’s profile combines resource sovereignty, foreign-base withdrawal, sanctions pressure and transition-rule risk. It requires balanced review: external pressure does not excuse internal accountability gaps.", "risk_logic": "Resource and military dependency can weaken sovereignty; military transition can also weaken rights. Trust requires public resource terms, civilian safeguards and a credible constitutional pathway.", "safe_actions": [ "Track base closure and replacement arrangements", "Request uranium/resource contract transparency", "Monitor civilian-protection and political-rights safeguards", "Preserve public timeline" ], "demand_origins": [], "pattern_flags": [], "source_links": [], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-CHAD", "title": "Chad — military cooperation, transition-rule and base-withdrawal risk", "country": "Chad", "region": "Central Africa / Sahel", "lat": 15.454166, "lon": 18.732207, "status": "public-risk profile", "overall_risk_score": 79, "evidence_strength": 60, "trust_index": 32, "presence_type": [ "foreign defence agreements", "base withdrawal", "transition rule", "counterterrorism" ], "abuse_types": [ "civilian-protection risk", "jurisdiction opacity", "transition legitimacy", "foreign dependency" ], "chronology": "1970s-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Chad requires review of defence agreements, base withdrawals, transition legitimacy, civilian harm and whether external powers used security cooperation to preserve influence rather than protect the population.", "risk_logic": "Security cooperation becomes suspect where the population cannot inspect agreements, remedies, jurisdiction, withdrawal terms or the real effect on civilian protection.", "safe_actions": [ "Attach treaty texts and withdrawal chronology", "Request civilian complaint routes", "Track transition-rights indicators", "Avoid publishing protected military/community sources" ], "demand_origins": [], "pattern_flags": [], "source_links": [], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-QATAR-MIGRANT-WORKER-PROTECTION", "title": "Qatar / Gulf — African migrant worker protection and coercive labor-risk profile", "country": "Qatar / Gulf states", "region": "Gulf / African labor routes", "lat": 25.354826, "lon": 51.183884, "status": "source-linked profile", "overall_risk_score": 76, "evidence_strength": 70, "trust_index": 28, "presence_type": [ "labor sponsorship", "security diplomacy", "soft power", "investment leverage" ], "abuse_types": [ "migrant worker abuse", "passport/control risk", "wage theft/coercion", "racialized labor hierarchy", "soft-power laundering" ], "chronology": "1990-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Although not a classic military profile, Gulf labor/security power affects African protection through recruitment chains, labor coercion, sponsorship control, soft-power diplomacy and investment leverage.", "risk_logic": "A state can project coercive power through labor systems and sponsorship, not only armies. Trust requires enforceable worker rights, remedy, recruitment-chain controls and no soft-power laundering of abuse.", "safe_actions": [ "Track recruitment-chain abuses with public reports", "Request embassy labor-protection protocols", "Use professional/legal support, not public witness exposure", "Add right-of-reply and reform evidence where documented" ], "demand_origins": [], "pattern_flags": [], "source_links": [], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-HAITI-MINUSTAH-SEA-CHOLERA-IMPUNITY", "title": "Haiti — MINUSTAH sexual abuse, cholera and accountability-evasion pattern", "country": "Haiti", "region": "Caribbean / Americas", "lat": 18.971187, "lon": -72.285215, "status": "public-risk / source-linked review needed", "overall_risk_score": 90, "evidence_strength": 78, "trust_index": 16, "presence_type": [ "UN peacekeeping", "foreign security mission", "international immunity architecture", "gang/security crisis" ], "abuse_types": [ "sexual exploitation and abuse", "child protection", "cholera/public-health harm", "complaints suppression", "accountability evasion", "civilian harm" ], "chronology": "2004-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Haiti is a major accountability-evasion pattern: peacekeeping forces operated under international authority while public reports documented sexual exploitation/abuse allegations and the cholera disaster. The present risk lens is not limited to what institutions admit; it asks whether complaint systems, jurisdiction, immunity and political power prevented effective investigation and remedy.", "risk_logic": "Where foreign/international forces create harm but jurisdiction, immunity and institutional self-protection block remedies, the default trust posture must be low until victim remedy, prosecution, archive disclosure and independent oversight are proven.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a Haiti SEA/cholera public-source packet", "Separate substantiated findings, allegations, institutional admissions and remedy failures", "Ask UN/AU/OAS/legal clinics for accountability-route review", "Never expose survivor identities publicly" ], "source_links": [ { "label": "Yale/NYU report on Haiti cholera and accountability", "url": "https://law.yale.edu/sites/default/files/documents/pdf/Clinics/Haiti_TDC_Final_Report.pdf" }, { "label": "Human Rights Watch: UN peacekeeping sexual abuse problem", "url": "https://www.hrw.org/news/2020/01/11/un-peacekeeping-has-sexual-abuse-problem" }, { "label": "Ivers 2017: peacekeeping impunity harms Haiti", "url": "https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5590614/" } ], "pattern_flags": [ "immunity architecture", "complaints without remedy", "victim/survivor protection", "institutional non-response" ], "demand_origins": [], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-HAITI-DISAPPEARANCE-ORGAN-TRAFFICKING-ALLEGATION", "title": "Haiti — disappearances, mutilation reports and organ-trafficking allegation requiring protected review", "country": "Haiti", "region": "Caribbean / Americas", "lat": 19.0, "lon": -72.5, "status": "public-risk / source-linked review needed", "overall_risk_score": 84, "evidence_strength": 46, "trust_index": 20, "presence_type": [ "gang violence", "weak justice system", "international security vacuum", "possible trafficking networks" ], "abuse_types": [ "disappearance pattern", "organ trafficking allegation", "mutilation reports", "kidnapping", "complaints under-investigated", "protected-source risk" ], "chronology": "2020-present", "plain_diagnosis": "This is an allegation-sensitive profile. Public reporting and public statements have raised questions around disappearances, mutilated bodies and possible organ trafficking. PASO should not present organ harvesting as established without legal-grade evidence, but should refuse the opposite error: powerful actors do not get to decide that uninvestigated allegations are irrelevant.", "risk_logic": "Where disappearances, mutilation, weak state capacity and trafficking allegations coincide, the correct public standard is investigation threshold, not final accusation. Lack of investigation by captured or overwhelmed institutions is itself a risk signal.", "safe_actions": [ "Classify each entry: disappearance, kidnapping, mutilation, trafficking allegation, confirmed finding", "Use public media and official statements only in public layer", "Route any witness material through protected legal channels", "Ask for independent forensic and anti-trafficking review" ], "source_links": [ { "label": "AyiboPost: unexplained disappearances raise questions in Haiti", "url": "https://ayibopost.com/unexplained-disappearances-raise-questions-in-haiti/" }, { "label": "Public video: Haiti organ trafficking allegations / public statement", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1zXRBVIQGO0" }, { "label": "U.S. State Department 2024 human rights report: Haiti", "url": "https://www.state.gov/reports/2024-country-reports-on-human-rights-practices/haiti" } ], "pattern_flags": [ "investigation threshold", "not final finding", "forensic review needed", "anti-trafficking review" ], "demand_origins": [], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-US-OVERSEAS-BASES-SEX-TRAFFICKING", "title": "United States overseas bases — sex trafficking, prostitution economy and accountability pattern", "country": "United States overseas footprint", "region": "Global", "lat": 36.5, "lon": 127.8, "status": "public-risk / source-linked review needed", "overall_risk_score": 86, "evidence_strength": 74, "trust_index": 18, "presence_type": [ "foreign bases", "R&R economies", "contractor/labor networks", "military demand ecosystem" ], "abuse_types": [ "sex trafficking", "commercial sexual exploitation", "labor trafficking", "women and girls protection", "complaints suppression", "jurisdiction gap" ], "chronology": "1945-present", "plain_diagnosis": "The U.S. overseas-base pattern is historically tied to prostitution economies, camptowns, trafficking risk and contractor/labor abuses. The key question is structural: does a military presence create or sustain demand, impunity, dependency and complaint-suppression around vulnerable women, girls and migrant workers?", "risk_logic": "A base does not need an official trafficking policy to create trafficking risk. When military demand, local poverty, contractor layers, immigration dependency and jurisdiction gaps coexist, abuse risk is structural unless independently mitigated.", "safe_actions": [ "Map public base-adjacent trafficking literature by country", "Ask host states for complaint channels and base-status terms", "Track contractor labor chains", "Separate individual crimes from structural demand patterns" ], "source_links": [ { "label": "Fordham Law Review: sex trafficking and U.S. military bases overseas", "url": "https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5636&context=flr" }, { "label": "Military prostitution and U.S. military in Asia", "url": "https://apjjf.org/katharine-hs-moon/3019/article" }, { "label": "Oxford chapter: U.S. military–prostitution complex", "url": "https://academic.oup.com/book/38724/chapter/336946591" } ], "pattern_flags": [ "demand-side abuse", "jurisdiction gap", "camptown history", "contractor labor layers" ], "demand_origins": [], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-AFGHANISTAN-IRAQ-CONTRACTOR-LABOR-TRAFFICKING", "title": "Iraq / Afghanistan — contractor labor trafficking and war-logistics abuse pattern", "country": "Iraq / Afghanistan", "region": "Middle East / Central Asia", "lat": 33.3152, "lon": 44.3661, "status": "public-risk / source-linked review needed", "overall_risk_score": 82, "evidence_strength": 62, "trust_index": 24, "presence_type": [ "war logistics", "private contractors", "U.S./coalition bases", "migrant labor networks" ], "abuse_types": [ "labor trafficking", "debt bondage", "passport control", "contractor opacity", "war-profiteering", "complaints evasion" ], "chronology": "2001-present", "plain_diagnosis": "War-zone logistics outsourced to contractors created documented labor-trafficking risks for migrant workers on or around military bases. This profile tracks the abuse pattern where military demand, subcontracting, recruitment debt and weak remedy combine.", "risk_logic": "A state can deny direct responsibility while benefiting from contractor labor layers. Plausible deniability is not a protection proof; it is a risk condition unless audits, chain liability and worker remedies are enforceable.", "safe_actions": [ "Request prime/subcontractor chains", "Track recruitment-fee and passport-confiscation claims", "Ask for U.S./coalition contractor audit records", "Support worker-safe complaint channels" ], "source_links": [ { "label": "Labor trafficking found on U.S. military bases / public video", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MafmChnRiSI" }, { "label": "Human trafficking and U.S. military bases overseas reference", "url": "https://www.womenvetsusa.org/news/index.php/category-27/" } ], "pattern_flags": [ "subcontractor opacity", "war logistics", "worker debt", "base labor" ], "demand_origins": [], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-EPSTEIN-AFRICA-ELITE-NETWORKS-UNRESOLVED", "title": "Epstein-linked Africa elite networks — unresolved trafficking and influence-risk profile", "country": "Africa / elite networks", "region": "Transnational", "lat": 0.0, "lon": 20.0, "status": "public-risk / source-linked review needed", "overall_risk_score": 78, "evidence_strength": 62, "trust_index": 20, "presence_type": [ "elite networks", "private aircraft/travel", "political introductions", "philanthropy laundering", "business access" ], "abuse_types": [ "sexual predation allegation", "trafficking network risk", "elite protection", "investigation suppression", "accountability evasion" ], "chronology": "2000s-2020s", "plain_diagnosis": "Public reporting on released Epstein materials describes African political/business contacts, recruiters and elite introductions. The proper risk framing is not that every named contact is guilty; it is that elite access, philanthropy, travel, recruitment and power protection created unresolved investigation duties.", "risk_logic": "When a trafficker or alleged trafficker uses elite networks, philanthropy and political introductions, the evidentiary question cannot be limited to admissions. Uninvestigated elite proximity is a public-protection risk requiring transparent inquiry.", "safe_actions": [ "Separate named contact, facilitator, recruiter allegation and confirmed conduct", "Do not accuse without document-specific evidence", "Ask for independent review of released files involving African networks", "Protect potential victims and witnesses" ], "source_links": [ { "label": "Le Monde Africa: Epstein's African connections", "url": "https://www.lemonde.fr/en/le-monde-africa/article/2026/02/16/epstein-s-african-connections-included-presidents-heirs-and-recruiters_6750524_124.html" } ], "pattern_flags": [ "elite impunity", "philanthropy laundering", "unresolved investigation", "victim protection" ], "demand_origins": [], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-US-BLACK-DISAPPEARANCE-INDUSTRIAL-MEDICAL-PATTERN", "title": "United States — Black disappearance, industrial exposure and medical-experimentation historical-risk lens", "country": "United States / Black communities", "region": "North America", "lat": 39.8283, "lon": -98.5795, "status": "public-risk / source-linked review needed", "overall_risk_score": 75, "evidence_strength": 60, "trust_index": 26, "presence_type": [ "industrial corridors", "policing/security systems", "medical institutions", "historical experimentation", "data gaps" ], "abuse_types": [ "disappearance concern", "environmental racism", "medical exploitation history", "under-investigation", "community vulnerability" ], "chronology": "1800s-present", "plain_diagnosis": "This profile is a pattern lens, not a single allegation. It asks whether Black communities face overlapping vulnerability: disappearance under-investigation, industrial siting, medical exploitation history, policing/security exposure and unequal institutional response.", "risk_logic": "Powerful systems often define validity around what they admit. PASO should instead track public patterns: exposure clustering, complaint dismissal, missing data, historical experimentation and institutional failure to investigate Black harm with equal seriousness.", "safe_actions": [ "Use public missing-person, pollution, health and court datasets", "Separate historical documented medical abuse from current allegations", "Map industrial exposure near Black communities", "Invite community organizations to submit public-source corrections" ], "source_links": [ { "label": "EPA: exposure to air pollution higher for people of color", "url": "https://www.epa.gov/sciencematters/study-finds-exposure-air-pollution-higher-people-color-regardless-region-or-income" }, { "label": "Mohai et al. 2009 environmental justice disparities", "url": "https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2774179/" }, { "label": "Environmental racism and Black community health overview", "url": "https://tcf.org/content/commentary/environmental-racism-left-black-communities-especially-vulnerable-covid-19/" } ], "pattern_flags": [ "pattern lens", "data-gap risk", "environmental racism", "medical history" ], "demand_origins": [], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-XAI-MEMPHIS-BLACK-NEIGHBORHOOD-POLLUTION", "title": "xAI / Memphis — Black neighborhood pollution and AI infrastructure environmental-justice risk", "country": "United States / Memphis", "region": "North America", "lat": 35.0441, "lon": -90.0741, "status": "public-risk / source-linked review needed", "overall_risk_score": 74, "evidence_strength": 72, "trust_index": 28, "presence_type": [ "AI infrastructure", "industrial siting", "gas turbines", "data-center power demand", "environmental justice" ], "abuse_types": [ "air pollution allegation", "environmental racism", "community health risk", "permit/oversight dispute", "corporate accountability" ], "chronology": "2024-present", "plain_diagnosis": "This is an environmental-justice infrastructure profile. Public actions by NAACP and environmental lawyers allege xAI operated polluting gas turbines affecting predominantly Black communities near Memphis. The issue is not military abuse, but it belongs in the wider coercive-infrastructure pattern: powerful technology infrastructure externalizes risk onto racialized communities.", "risk_logic": "A company does not need to declare racist intent for an environmental-racism risk to exist. Where polluting infrastructure is placed near historically burdened Black neighborhoods with permit/oversight disputes, the public-protection posture is heightened scrutiny.", "safe_actions": [ "Track permit filings, emissions estimates and community complaints", "Ask for public health impact assessment", "Demand best available pollution controls and community remedy", "Separate xAI-specific evidence from broader Elon Musk/X/Starlink references" ], "source_links": [ { "label": "NAACP notice of intent to sue xAI over Memphis data center pollution", "url": "https://naacp.org/articles/elon-musks-xai-threatened-lawsuit-over-air-pollution-memphis-data-center-filed-behalf" }, { "label": "AP: NAACP and SELC notify xAI of intent to sue over pollution", "url": "https://apnews.com/article/571c16950259b382f9eae61bd59260ef" }, { "label": "Earthjustice: NAACP sues xAI over illegal pollution from data center", "url": "https://earthjustice.org/press/2026/xai-sued-for-illegal-power-plant" } ], "pattern_flags": [ "environmental justice", "AI infrastructure", "Black neighborhoods", "permit dispute" ], "demand_origins": [], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-CANCER-ALLEY-BLACK-COMMUNITY-INDUSTRIAL-PATTERN", "title": "Cancer Alley / Black communities — industrial exposure and benefit-exclusion pattern", "country": "United States / Louisiana", "region": "North America", "lat": 30.0, "lon": -90.7, "status": "public-risk / source-linked review needed", "overall_risk_score": 79, "evidence_strength": 70, "trust_index": 24, "presence_type": [ "petrochemical corridor", "industrial zoning", "plant proximity", "tax incentives", "historically Black towns" ], "abuse_types": [ "environmental racism", "cancer/asthma burden", "industrial pollution", "community displacement", "benefit exclusion" ], "chronology": "1960-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Cancer Alley and related Black-founded communities show a broader industrial-abuse pattern: communities carry health and cultural damage while receiving limited economic benefit and facing pressure from industrial development.", "risk_logic": "If pollution burdens and economic benefits are racially asymmetric, the injury is not only environmental; it is a structural extraction pattern. Trust requires exposure data, jobs/tax benefit transparency, consent and remedy.", "safe_actions": [ "Map facility proximity, health burden and job-benefit distribution", "Preserve public environmental permits and lawsuits", "Track threats against community defenders", "Use community-led review before publication" ], "source_links": [ { "label": "AP: Black residents get most pollution but few petrochemical jobs", "url": "https://apnews.com/article/6dc7cc72321876641afe51e62cf4b8de" }, { "label": "Guardian: Black-founded freetowns fighting polluters", "url": "https://www.theguardian.com/news/2024/apr/14/descendants-project-black-founded-freetowns-louisiana" }, { "label": "EPA: pollution exposure higher for people of color", "url": "https://www.epa.gov/sciencematters/study-finds-exposure-air-pollution-higher-people-color-regardless-region-or-income" } ], "pattern_flags": [ "industrial racism", "benefit exclusion", "community defenders", "structural extraction" ], "demand_origins": [], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-MISSING-ABUSE-COMPLAINT-SUPPRESSION-MATRIX", "title": "Complaint suppression matrix — dismissed abuse reports, missing persons and powerful-party denial pattern", "country": "Transnational", "region": "Global", "lat": 10.0, "lon": 0.0, "status": "public-risk / source-linked review needed", "overall_risk_score": 81, "evidence_strength": 42, "trust_index": 18, "presence_type": [ "state institutions", "military/security actors", "corporate actors", "elite networks", "complaint systems" ], "abuse_types": [ "dismissed complaints", "missing persons", "trafficking allegation", "organ trafficking allegation", "sexual abuse allegation", "retaliation", "investigation failure" ], "chronology": "ongoing", "plain_diagnosis": "This is a meta-profile for pattern visibility. It tracks where repeated complaints of disappearance, trafficking, sexual abuse, organ harvesting, medical abuse or industrial harm are dismissed, delayed, suppressed or treated as invalid because the accused party is powerful.", "risk_logic": "The absence of admission is not absence of risk. Where complaints cluster around powerful actors and investigations are absent, delayed, conflicted or suppressed, PASO should flag an investigation threshold and accountability-evasion risk.", "safe_actions": [ "Build a complaint-status table: filed, ignored, dismissed, investigated, substantiated, remedied", "Classify evidence state transparently", "Never expose complainants publicly", "Escalate through professional bodies and legal channels when patterns cluster" ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "meta-pattern", "investigation threshold", "power asymmetry", "complaint dismissal" ], "demand_origins": [], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-LIBYA-EU-FUNDED-MIGRATION-DETENTION-ABUSE", "title": "Libya — EU-backed migration containment, detention abuse and slavery-risk chain", "country": "Libya / European Union", "region": "North Africa / Europe", "lat": 26.3351, "lon": 17.2283, "status": "public-risk / source-linked review needed", "overall_risk_score": 94, "evidence_strength": 84, "trust_index": 12, "demand_origins": [ "European Union", "Italy", "European border-control demand" ], "presence_type": [ "EU border externalization", "Libyan coastguard/security forces", "detention facilities", "migration-control funding", "proxy enforcement" ], "abuse_types": [ "slavery/forced labor", "rape/torture allegation", "child abuse risk", "collective expulsion", "detention abuse", "accountability evasion" ], "chronology": "2015-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Libya is a central example of modern outsourced coercion. European funds, equipment, training and diplomatic support are publicly linked to migration containment while migrants face torture, rape, forced labor, detention and trafficking. The pattern exposes a demand origin: Europe wants migrants stopped before arrival, while abuse is displaced onto Libyan facilities and networks.", "risk_logic": "When a powerful external actor funds containment systems while abuses are repeatedly documented in facilities and transfer chains, responsibility cannot be pushed entirely onto local actors. Outsourcing abuse is a colonial-continuity pattern, not a clean separation.", "safe_actions": [ "Map EU funding, equipment and training lines", "Attach UN/OHCHR/IOM/press records", "Ask EU bodies for human-rights monitoring and suspension triggers", "Route strongest evidence to UN Special Procedures and ICC pre-screen where jurisdiction fits" ], "source_links": [ { "label": "OHCHR/UNSMIL: Libya migrants victims of violent business model", "url": "https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2026/02/migrants-libya-victims-violent-business-model-systemic-violations-and-abuses" }, { "label": "OHCHR: Detained and dehumanised report", "url": "https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Countries/LY/DetainedAndDehumanised_en.pdf" }, { "label": "Amnesty EU-Libya complicity analysis", "url": "https://www.amnesty.eu/news/eu-libya-eus-migration-cooperation-with-libya-is-morally-bankrupt-and-amounts-to-complicity-in-violations/" }, { "label": "ReliefWeb: EU-funded boats to Libyan coastguard", "url": "https://reliefweb.int/report/libya/eu-funded-boats-abusive-libyan-coastguard-underline-european-complicity-grave" } ], "pattern_flags": [ "outsourced border violence", "demand origin visible", "slavery rebranded as migration management", "EU complicity allegation" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-FRANCE-ALGERIA-TORTURE-DISAPPEARANCE-AMNESTY", "title": "France / Algeria — systematic torture, disappearances and amnesty-accountability pattern", "country": "Algeria / France", "region": "North Africa / Europe", "lat": 28.0339, "lon": 1.6596, "status": "public-risk / source-linked review needed", "overall_risk_score": 93, "evidence_strength": 84, "trust_index": 10, "demand_origins": [ "France", "settler colonial economy", "counterinsurgency doctrine" ], "presence_type": [ "colonial military occupation", "counterinsurgency", "settler-colonial land regime", "amnesty laws", "archive control" ], "abuse_types": [ "torture", "disappearance", "mass violence", "accountability evasion", "archive suppression", "population replacement/settler colonialism" ], "chronology": "1830-1962 and memory aftermath", "plain_diagnosis": "Algeria shows the mature colonial military-abuse pattern: physical cleansing, settler replacement, torture, disappearances, archive control and later legal amnesties. The continuity risk is not only historical guilt; it is the method: state violence normalized, then hidden by legal closure and memory management.", "risk_logic": "Where systematic torture and disappearance were state practices and later shielded by amnesty and archive delay, the burden is on the former colonial power to prove a real break in methods, incentives and accountability.", "safe_actions": [ "Link official admissions, archives and survivor records", "Track amnesty/impunity architecture", "Separate historical record from present policy inference", "Use as baseline for French external-force trust scoring" ], "source_links": [ { "label": "Guardian: France admits state responsibility in Algeria torture case", "url": "https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/sep/13/france-state-responsible-for-1957-death-of-dissident-maurice-audin-in-algeria-says-macron" } ], "pattern_flags": [ "systematic torture", "disappearance", "amnesty shield", "settler replacement" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-FRANCE-CAMEROON-SECRET-WAR-REPRESSION", "title": "France / Cameroon — hidden war, forced displacement and loyal-regime installation pattern", "country": "Cameroon / France", "region": "Central Africa / Europe", "lat": 5.9631, "lon": 12.2215, "status": "public-risk / source-linked review needed", "overall_risk_score": 91, "evidence_strength": 78, "trust_index": 12, "demand_origins": [ "France", "French strategic control", "anti-sovereignty counterinsurgency" ], "presence_type": [ "colonial counterinsurgency", "proxy militias", "post-independence influence", "memory suppression", "paramilitary / PMC / auxiliary force" ], "abuse_types": [ "forced displacement", "internment camps", "targeted killings", "village destruction", "regime installation", "accountability evasion" ], "chronology": "1945-1971", "plain_diagnosis": "Cameroon demonstrates colonialism after the flag: formal independence coexisted with French military repression, loyal-regime engineering and memory suppression. Contemporary Françafrique patterns emerge from a documented machinery of repression and political replacement.", "risk_logic": "A system that violently suppresses sovereign movements, supports loyal structures and then hides the war cannot be treated as neutral in later African military/diplomatic contexts unless accountability and incentive change are demonstrated.", "safe_actions": [ "Attach commission findings and public admissions", "Map continuity from colonial war to postcolonial influence networks", "Use as historical baseline for French trust scores", "Protect local memory holders and archive custodians" ], "source_links": [ { "label": "AP: Macron admits France's repressive violence in Cameroon", "url": "https://apnews.com/article/8ac5c6e04edf71403f877ee8cb2d6e62" }, { "label": "Le Monde: the forgotten war between France and Cameroon", "url": "https://www.lemonde.fr/en/history/visuel/2025/12/13/the-forgotten-war-between-france-and-cameroon_6748457_157.html" } ], "pattern_flags": [ "hidden war", "loyal-regime engineering", "forced displacement", "memory suppression", "source-origin discipline required", "victim/community testimony threshold" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-FRANCE-RWANDA-GENOCIDE-STATE-RESPONSIBILITY", "title": "France / Rwanda — genocide-period policy, Operation Turquoise and responsibility-risk pattern", "country": "Rwanda / France", "region": "Great Lakes / Europe", "lat": -1.9403, "lon": 29.8739, "status": "public-risk / source-linked review needed", "overall_risk_score": 90, "evidence_strength": 80, "trust_index": 14, "demand_origins": [ "France", "Francophone geopolitical control", "anti-RPF alignment" ], "presence_type": [ "military assistance", "Operation Turquoise", "diplomatic shielding", "archive politics" ], "abuse_types": [ "genocide-enabling risk", "civilian protection failure", "accountability evasion", "information laundering" ], "chronology": "1990-1994 and aftermath", "plain_diagnosis": "The Rwanda profile is a high-severity state-responsibility pattern. Public historical work documents France’s role and responsibilities during the pre-genocidal and genocide period. The risk logic is not that every French actor had the same intent; it is that alliance, denial, delay, military presence and archive control can enable catastrophic outcomes.", "risk_logic": "Where a foreign state had military/diplomatic leverage during a genocide-risk period and later manages archives, narratives and accountability, trust requires full transparency, not selective memory.", "safe_actions": [ "Use Duclert report and Rwandan records", "Separate complicity, responsibility, failure, denial and legal findings", "Track archive access and official narrative shifts", "Use as genocide-risk baseline for current external security claims" ], "source_links": [ { "label": "Duclert Commission report PDF", "url": "https://www.vie-publique.fr/files/rapport/pdf/284672.pdf" } ], "pattern_flags": [ "genocide risk", "archive control", "military alliance", "narrative management" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-OPERATION-CONDOR-US-LATIN-AMERICA", "title": "Latin America — Operation Condor, U.S. knowledge/support and transnational repression", "country": "Chile / Argentina / Uruguay / Paraguay / Bolivia / Brazil / United States", "region": "Latin America / United States", "lat": -33.4489, "lon": -70.6693, "status": "public-risk / source-linked review needed", "overall_risk_score": 92, "evidence_strength": 86, "trust_index": 14, "demand_origins": [ "United States", "anti-communist geopolitical order", "military dictatorships" ], "presence_type": [ "military dictatorships", "intelligence coordination", "U.S. knowledge/support", "transnational repression" ], "abuse_types": [ "disappearances", "assassination", "torture", "rendition", "anti-left repression", "accountability evasion" ], "chronology": "1970s-1980s", "plain_diagnosis": "Operation Condor makes the Latin American pattern explicit: coordinated dictatorships used disappearance, torture and assassination across borders while U.S. agencies possessed knowledge and declassified records later exposed the network. This is a template for transnational repression under anti-communist/anti-sovereignty logic.", "risk_logic": "Where a superpower knows of transnational repression and fails to stop it, or supports aligned dictatorships, later democracy/human-rights rhetoric carries a structural trust discount until full accountability is proven.", "safe_actions": [ "Use declassified records as primary anchors", "Map states, victims, agencies and dates", "Separate knowledge, support, coordination and direct responsibility", "Use as historical baseline for current security partnerships" ], "source_links": [ { "label": "National Security Archive: Operation Condor documents", "url": "https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/briefing-book/southern-cone/2025-11-26/operation-condor-network-transnational-repression-50-years" }, { "label": "U.S. Office of the Historian: CIA summary of Operation Condor", "url": "https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1977-80v24/d6" } ], "pattern_flags": [ "transnational repression", "declassified evidence", "disappearances", "U.S. knowledge" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-GUATEMALA-US-COUNTERINSURGENCY-GENOCIDE", "title": "Guatemala — U.S.-backed counterinsurgency and Indigenous genocide-risk pattern", "country": "Guatemala / United States", "region": "Latin America", "lat": 15.7835, "lon": -90.2308, "status": "public-risk / source-linked review needed", "overall_risk_score": 90, "evidence_strength": 72, "trust_index": 16, "demand_origins": [ "United States", "United Fruit/corporate interests", "Guatemalan military elites" ], "presence_type": [ "counterinsurgency", "military aid", "elite land control", "anti-left repression" ], "abuse_types": [ "genocide finding", "Indigenous cleansing", "massacres", "land dispossession", "accountability evasion" ], "chronology": "1954-1996", "plain_diagnosis": "Guatemala shows how anti-communist policy, land/economic interests and military aid can merge into mass violence against Indigenous populations. The pattern includes coup support, counterinsurgency, massacres and land control.", "risk_logic": "When land, race, anti-left doctrine and foreign support align, population elimination can be framed as security. PASO should track demand origins and local executors together.", "safe_actions": [ "Attach truth commission and declassified records", "Map land/economic beneficiaries", "Separate U.S. support, local command and corporate interests", "Use Indigenous survivor-safe review" ], "source_links": [ { "label": "National Security Archive Guatemala documentation project", "url": "https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/project/guatemala-documentation-project" } ], "pattern_flags": [ "Indigenous genocide", "land control", "corporate-state demand", "security pretext" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-INDONESIA-1965-US-UK-KILLING-LISTS", "title": "Indonesia 1965 — anti-communist mass killings and Western intelligence support pattern", "country": "Indonesia / United States / United Kingdom", "region": "Asia", "lat": -2.5489, "lon": 118.0149, "status": "public-risk / source-linked review needed", "overall_risk_score": 88, "evidence_strength": 70, "trust_index": 18, "demand_origins": [ "United States", "United Kingdom", "anti-communist geopolitical order" ], "presence_type": [ "anti-communist purge", "intelligence support", "military regime", "resource/geostrategic alignment" ], "abuse_types": [ "mass killing", "detention", "political cleansing", "list-based repression", "accountability evasion" ], "chronology": "1965-1966", "plain_diagnosis": "Indonesia is a key Asian pattern: anti-communist mass killing, military consolidation and Western support or encouragement. Mass elimination is often rebranded as order, stability or anti-extremism.", "risk_logic": "Where foreign powers benefit from a purge and provide information, support, recognition or silence, they cannot be treated as neutral observers. The demand origin and geopolitical payoff matter.", "safe_actions": [ "Attach declassified records and scholarship", "Map foreign knowledge/support separately from local command", "Track resource/geostrategic beneficiaries", "Use as Asia baseline for anti-sovereignty repression" ], "source_links": [ { "label": "National Security Archive: Indonesia 1965 declassified files", "url": "https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/briefing-book/indonesia/2017-10-17/indonesia-1965-declassified-files" } ], "pattern_flags": [ "mass purge", "list-based repression", "foreign knowledge", "geostrategic payoff" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-VIETNAM-AGENT-ORANGE-CHEMICAL-WARFARE", "title": "Vietnam — Agent Orange, chemical warfare and intergenerational environmental harm", "country": "Vietnam / United States", "region": "Asia", "lat": 14.0583, "lon": 108.2772, "status": "public-risk / source-linked review needed", "overall_risk_score": 91, "evidence_strength": 82, "trust_index": 16, "demand_origins": [ "United States military", "chemical manufacturers", "anti-communist war strategy" ], "presence_type": [ "military herbicide program", "chemical warfare", "corporate manufacturers", "base contamination" ], "abuse_types": [ "toxic exposure", "birth defects allegation", "environmental poisoning", "intergenerational harm", "corporate/state accountability" ], "chronology": "1961-1971 and aftermath", "plain_diagnosis": "Agent Orange is a clear example of military environmental violence. The pattern is not only battlefield conduct; it is long-term poisoning of soil, water, bodies and future generations, followed by partial cleanup, contested causation and uneven compensation.", "risk_logic": "When military policy knowingly saturates land with toxic chemicals, population harm continues after war. Colonial logic reappears as environmental elimination: poisoning the land can substitute for occupying it.", "safe_actions": [ "Track official cleanup and health records", "Separate established toxic contamination from disputed causation", "Map former bases and affected regions only at public level", "Add corporate manufacturer accountability layer" ], "source_links": [ { "label": "U.S. VA: Agent Orange exposure overview", "url": "https://www.publichealth.va.gov/exposures/agentorange/" }, { "label": "Stellman 2018: lingering health impact", "url": "https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5944896/" } ], "pattern_flags": [ "chemical warfare", "environmental elimination", "intergenerational harm", "corporate-state nexus" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-BHOPAL-UNION-CARBIDE-DOW-INDIA", "title": "Bhopal — Union Carbide/Dow toxic disaster and environmental-racism accountability pattern", "country": "India / United States corporate chain", "region": "Asia", "lat": 23.2599, "lon": 77.4126, "status": "public-risk / source-linked review needed", "overall_risk_score": 89, "evidence_strength": 82, "trust_index": 18, "demand_origins": [ "Union Carbide", "Dow Chemical corporate chain", "industrial cost externalization" ], "presence_type": [ "chemical industry", "corporate impunity", "toxic waste legacy", "weak remediation" ], "abuse_types": [ "mass poisoning", "groundwater contamination", "environmental racism", "corporate accountability evasion", "long-term health harm" ], "chronology": "1984-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Bhopal is a global corporate-violence baseline: a U.S.-linked corporate chain caused mass toxic exposure and long-term contamination, with survivors still contesting remediation and accountability decades later.", "risk_logic": "When toxic industry kills or sickens large populations in the Global South and corporate/legal structures prevent full remedy, the pattern is not an accident alone; it is an accountability and racialized risk-transfer system.", "safe_actions": [ "Attach health, court and cleanup records", "Track Dow/Union Carbide liability positions", "Map waste, groundwater and community exposure data", "Use professional medical/environmental review" ], "source_links": [ { "label": "NIH review: Bhopal disaster and aftermath", "url": "https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1142333/" }, { "label": "Amnesty: environmental racism and Bhopal injustice", "url": "https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2024/12/india-environmental-racism-enabled-forty-years-of-injustice-for-survivors-of-bhopal-gas-tragedy/" } ], "pattern_flags": [ "corporate impunity", "toxic legacy", "environmental racism", "mass poisoning" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-TRAFIGURA-PROBO-KOALA-COTE-DIVOIRE", "title": "Côte d’Ivoire — Trafigura Probo Koala toxic dumping and remedy-evasion pattern", "country": "Côte d’Ivoire / Netherlands / Switzerland / UK", "region": "West Africa", "lat": 5.3453, "lon": -4.0244, "status": "public-risk / source-linked review needed", "overall_risk_score": 88, "evidence_strength": 84, "trust_index": 18, "demand_origins": [ "Trafigura", "European commodity trading", "toxic cost externalization" ], "presence_type": [ "commodity trader", "toxic waste shipping", "port/dumping chain", "corporate legal defense" ], "abuse_types": [ "toxic waste dumping", "water/soil pollution", "mass health harm", "corporate impunity", "state failure to protect" ], "chronology": "2006-present", "plain_diagnosis": "The Probo Koala case shows toxic displacement: waste refused or costly to handle in Europe was dumped around Abidjan, causing mass health impacts and long legal aftermath. The demand origin is European commodity trading and cost avoidance.", "risk_logic": "When hazardous waste moves from a high-regulation jurisdiction to African soil and communities bear the harm, the pattern is colonial waste externalization.", "safe_actions": [ "Attach African Court and Amnesty/Public Eye records", "Map company chain and local contractors", "Track compensation and cleanup disputes", "Use as baseline for toxic dumping risk" ], "source_links": [ { "label": "Amnesty: Trafigura toxic journey", "url": "https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2016/04/trafigura-a-toxic-journey/" }, { "label": "FIDH: African Court victory for victims", "url": "https://www.fidh.org/en/issues/business-human-rights-environment/business-and-human-rights/ivory-coast-victory-at-the-african-court-for-victims-of-the-trafigura" } ], "pattern_flags": [ "toxic dumping", "European origin", "waste colonialism", "state failure" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-SHELL-NIGER-DELTA-OGONILAND", "title": "Niger Delta / Ogoniland — Shell oil pollution and divestment-accountability risk", "country": "Nigeria / Shell / UK-Netherlands", "region": "West Africa", "lat": 4.8156, "lon": 7.0498, "status": "public-risk / source-linked review needed", "overall_risk_score": 86, "evidence_strength": 84, "trust_index": 20, "demand_origins": [ "Shell", "British/Dutch oil demand", "Nigerian state-oil structures" ], "presence_type": [ "oil extraction", "pipeline spills", "divestment risk", "cleanup failure", "security repression history" ], "abuse_types": [ "water contamination", "soil pollution", "livelihood destruction", "environmental racism", "corporate accountability evasion", "defender repression" ], "chronology": "1950s-present", "plain_diagnosis": "The Niger Delta profile makes visible how oil extraction can poison land and water while corporations attempt to exit without full remediation. UNEP documented severe contamination in Ogoniland; activists continue to warn against responsibility evasion.", "risk_logic": "Pollution plus divestment is a replacement pattern: the wealth is extracted, the contamination remains, and communities inherit the cost.", "safe_actions": [ "Attach UNEP, Amnesty, SOMO and community records", "Track divestment and decommissioning liabilities", "Map cleanup commitments vs implementation", "Protect community defenders" ], "source_links": [ { "label": "UNEP: Ogoniland oil assessment", "url": "https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/story/unep-ogoniland-oil-assessment-reveals-extent-environmental-contamination-and" }, { "label": "Amnesty: no clean-up, no justice", "url": "https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2020/06/no-clean-up-no-justice-shell-oil-pollution-in-the-niger-delta/" } ], "pattern_flags": [ "extract then exit", "water poisoning", "defender risk", "corporate divestment" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-CHEVRON-TEXACO-ECUADOR-AMAZON", "title": "Ecuador Amazon — Chevron/Texaco pollution and corporate legal counterattack pattern", "country": "Ecuador / United States corporate chain", "region": "Latin America", "lat": -0.1807, "lon": -78.4678, "status": "public-risk / source-linked review needed", "overall_risk_score": 86, "evidence_strength": 74, "trust_index": 22, "demand_origins": [ "Texaco/Chevron", "U.S. corporate oil demand", "global oil markets" ], "presence_type": [ "oil extraction", "corporate litigation", "Indigenous territory", "toxic waste discharge" ], "abuse_types": [ "water/soil pollution", "Indigenous harm", "corporate impunity", "legal retaliation", "benefit extraction" ], "chronology": "1964-present", "plain_diagnosis": "The Chevron/Texaco Ecuador case shows how toxic extraction, Indigenous harm and corporate counter-litigation can turn victims into targets while pollution persists.", "risk_logic": "Where a corporation extracts wealth, leaves toxic waste and then uses transnational legal power to avoid or reverse accountability, the harm is not only environmental; it is legal warfare against affected populations.", "safe_actions": [ "Attach court/arbitration/community records", "Separate judgments and arbitration outcomes", "Track legal retaliation against advocates", "Use as corporate legal-war template" ], "source_links": [ { "label": "Amazon Watch: Chevron environmental crimes / evasion", "url": "https://amazonwatch.org/news/2024/0214-chevrons-environmental-crimes-13-years-of-evasion-and-escalation" }, { "label": "EJAtlas: Chevron-Texaco Ecuador case", "url": "https://ejatlas.org/conflict/chevron-texaco-ecuador" } ], "pattern_flags": [ "legal warfare", "Indigenous harm", "toxic extraction", "corporate counterattack" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-DAEWOO-MADAGASCAR-LAND-GRAB", "title": "Madagascar — Daewoo land-grab shock and food-sovereignty risk", "country": "Madagascar / South Korea", "region": "Africa / Asia", "lat": -18.7669, "lon": 46.8691, "status": "public-risk / source-linked review needed", "overall_risk_score": 78, "evidence_strength": 62, "trust_index": 30, "demand_origins": [ "South Korean agribusiness demand", "global food security panic", "elite land concession model" ], "presence_type": [ "foreign land acquisition", "agribusiness", "food security", "elite deal-making" ], "abuse_types": [ "land grabbing", "food sovereignty harm", "community displacement risk", "elite contract opacity" ], "chronology": "2008-present memory", "plain_diagnosis": "The Madagascar/Daewoo case is a landmark land-grab warning: large foreign land deals can turn people’s territory and food future into external supply chains. Even where deals collapse, the pattern matters because the incentive remains.", "risk_logic": "Land grabbing is population replacement by law and contract: people may remain physically present while their land, food system and future bargaining power are transferred.", "safe_actions": [ "Track land concession contracts and cancellation records", "Request community consent and food-sovereignty impact", "Map similar Gulf/Asian agribusiness deals", "Use legal-review templates for land sovereignty" ], "source_links": [ { "label": "GRAIN: 2008 landgrab for food and financial security", "url": "https://grain.org/en/article/93-seized-the-2008-landgrab-for-food-and-financial-security" } ], "pattern_flags": [ "food sovereignty", "legal replacement", "contractual dispossession", "land grab" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-GULF-LAND-FOOD-WATER-GRAB", "title": "Gulf states — African land, food and water extraction risk", "country": "UAE / Qatar / Saudi Arabia / African states", "region": "Gulf / Africa", "lat": 15.0, "lon": 30.0, "status": "public-risk / source-linked review needed", "overall_risk_score": 82, "evidence_strength": 58, "trust_index": 24, "demand_origins": [ "UAE", "Qatar", "Saudi Arabia", "Gulf food-security strategy" ], "presence_type": [ "foreign land acquisition", "food-security outsourcing", "water extraction", "investment diplomacy" ], "abuse_types": [ "land grabbing", "labor coercion", "water depletion", "elite capture", "community displacement" ], "chronology": "2008-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Gulf land and food-security strategies can externalize water and food production burdens into African territory. The public question is who benefits: local communities or foreign food-security systems backed by elite contracts.", "risk_logic": "Where water-poor wealthy states secure land abroad through opaque elite deals, land grabbing becomes remote resource extraction. It should be scored as sovereignty risk even without direct military presence.", "safe_actions": [ "Build country-by-country land contract register", "Identify demand origin: UAE/Qatar/Saudi food-security strategy", "Request community consent and water-use disclosure", "Track labor, displacement and export obligations" ], "source_links": [ { "label": "Land Matrix Initiative: large-scale land acquisitions database", "url": "https://landmatrix.org/" }, { "label": "GRAIN: state of the global farmland grab according to Land Matrix", "url": "https://grain.org/en/article/6758-the-state-of-the-global-farmland-grab-according-to-the-land-matrix" } ], "pattern_flags": [ "Gulf demand origin", "water grab", "elite contracts", "food sovereignty" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-APARTHEID-NETWORKS-TRAFFICKING-UNFINISHED-ACCOUNTABILITY", "title": "Apartheid-era networks — trafficking, security and extraction continuity-risk profile", "country": "Southern Africa / transnational networks", "region": "Southern Africa", "lat": -30.5595, "lon": 22.9375, "status": "public-risk / source-linked review needed", "overall_risk_score": 80, "evidence_strength": 42, "trust_index": 26, "demand_origins": [ "apartheid capital networks", "mining/logistics demand", "foreign security markets" ], "presence_type": [ "apartheid security networks", "private security", "mining/logistics", "organized crime continuities" ], "abuse_types": [ "trafficking allegation", "security-network continuity", "resource smuggling", "racialized labor control", "accountability evasion" ], "chronology": "1948-present continuities", "plain_diagnosis": "This is a pattern-investigation profile. Apartheid networks were not fully dismantled, and many security, mining, logistics and organized-crime capacities survived into private or transnational forms. PASO should map where trafficking, smuggling and racialized extraction networks appear to continue under new legal forms.", "risk_logic": "When a violent racial order ends politically but its security, capital and logistics networks survive, abuse may not disappear; it may privatize.", "safe_actions": [ "Build public-source timeline of apartheid security-to-private networks", "Separate confirmed facts from trafficking allegations", "Track mining/logistics/security companies and ownership", "Invite independent South African and regional review" ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "continuity inquiry", "not final finding", "private security", "racialized extraction" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-ORGAN-HARVESTING-HISTORICAL-MATRIX", "title": "Organ harvesting allegations — historical investigation matrix", "country": "Transnational", "region": "Global", "lat": 42.0, "lon": 20.0, "status": "public-risk / source-linked review needed", "overall_risk_score": 79, "evidence_strength": 58, "trust_index": 20, "demand_origins": [ "transplant markets", "war economies", "detention/trafficking systems" ], "presence_type": [ "war zones", "detention systems", "trafficking networks", "medical markets", "elite protection" ], "abuse_types": [ "organ trafficking allegation", "disappearance pattern", "medical exploitation", "detention abuse", "investigation suppression" ], "chronology": "1990-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Organ harvesting allegations are not new and must not be dismissed because they are disturbing. The correct approach is strict classification: public reports, legal findings, credible allegations, unresolved complaints and protected-review-only material must be separated.", "risk_logic": "Where disappearances, detention, war, trafficking networks and transplant markets overlap, investigation threshold is justified even without final proof. Powerful actors do not get to suppress inquiry by ridicule.", "safe_actions": [ "Use official/legal reports first", "Do not publish victim identities or graphic details", "Demand forensic review and chain-of-custody evidence", "Flag unresolved allegations separately from findings" ], "source_links": [ { "label": "Council of Europe: Kosovo organ trafficking allegations report", "url": "https://pace.coe.int/files/12608/html" }, { "label": "Kosovo Specialist Chambers: Council of Europe report reference", "url": "https://www.scp-ks.org/en/documents/council-europe-parliamentary-assembly-report-inhuman-treatment-people-and-illicit" } ], "pattern_flags": [ "investigation matrix", "war-zone trafficking", "medical market", "protected review" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-GENOCIDE-REPLACEMENT-MATRIX", "title": "Population elimination and replacement matrix — force, law, pollution, debt and land capture", "country": "Transnational", "region": "Global", "lat": 5.0, "lon": 10.0, "status": "public-risk / source-linked review needed", "overall_risk_score": 87, "evidence_strength": 50, "trust_index": 18, "demand_origins": [ "colonial powers", "debt institutions", "settler/elite capital", "extractive industries" ], "presence_type": [ "settler colonialism", "land law", "debt traps", "pollution exposure", "military/security systems", "migration containment" ], "abuse_types": [ "physical cleansing", "legal elimination", "land dispossession", "pollution displacement", "debt dependency", "population replacement" ], "chronology": "colonial period-present", "plain_diagnosis": "This meta-profile makes the replacement pattern visible. Populations can be eliminated or replaced not only by killing, but by land seizure, legal erasure, debt dependency, toxic exposure, migration containment, food-system capture and economic expulsion.", "risk_logic": "Colonialism did not need to disappear to continue. It can rebrand into contracts, debt instruments, environmental burdens, border outsourcing, elite security agreements and market dependency.", "safe_actions": [ "Classify each mechanism separately", "Require public indicators: land loss, pollution load, displacement, debt, legal exclusion, demographic replacement", "Avoid overclaiming intent without evidence", "Use the matrix to connect cases, not to replace case-specific proof" ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "meta-pattern", "replacement by law/contract", "pollution displacement", "debt trap" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-NIGERIA-GINGER-BLIGHT-BIOSECURITY-ALLEGATION-MATRIX", "title": "Nigeria ginger belt — crop collapse, biosecurity failure and bioterrorism-allegation matrix", "country": "Nigeria", "region": "West Africa", "lat": 10.5105, "lon": 7.4165, "status": "public-risk / source-linked review needed", "overall_risk_score": 76, "evidence_strength": 56, "trust_index": 28, "demand_origins": [ "unknown pathogen source", "agricultural markets", "food-import substitution interests", "biosecurity failure" ], "presence_type": [ "crop disease crisis", "biosecurity allegation", "food sovereignty harm", "farmer livelihood collapse", "investigation delay" ], "abuse_types": "2023-present", "chronology": "Nigeria’s ginger blight collapse is a food-sovereignty and biosecurity case. Public sources report massive crop losses, export decline and delayed identification. PASO should not claim bioterrorism without evidence, but it should classify bioterrorism allegations or suspicions as protected-review/investigation-threshold material where crop collapse has strategic effects.", "plain_diagnosis": "When a strategic crop collapses at scale and public investigation is delayed or incomplete, the measurable effect matters: production, exports, farmer debt, seed scarcity and import dependency. The cause must be investigated without letting powerful agricultural or industrial actors define the limits of inquiry.", "risk_logic": [ "Track crop-loss percentages and export data", "Request public lab/pathogen reports and response timelines", "Classify bioterrorism as allegation/protected-review-only unless evidence is strong", "Assess food sovereignty and debt effects" ], "safe_actions": [ { "label": "COLEAD: epidemic wiping out ginger production in Nigeria", "url": "https://news.colead.link/en/tackling-an-epidemic-that-is-wiping-out-ginger-production-in-nigeria-an-example-of-a-successful-progressive-and-participatory-approach/" }, { "label": "BusinessDay: ginger price jumps six-fold on blight disease", "url": "https://businessday.ng/agriculture/article/ginger-price-jumps-six-fold-on-blight-disease/" }, { "label": "FIJ: Kaduna ginger farmers count losses", "url": "https://fij.ng/article/special-report-kaduna-ginger-farmers-count-losses-as-strange-disease-ravages-crop/" } ], "source_links": [ "biosecurity allegation matrix", "not final finding", "measurable crop collapse", "food sovereignty" ], "pattern_flags": [], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-FRANCE-SENEGAL-THIAROYE-MASSACRE-AND-MILITARY-PENSION-ACCOUNTABILITY", "title": "France / Senegal Thiaroye massacre and military-pension accountability", "country": "Senegal / France", "region": "West Africa / Europe", "lat": 14.7167, "lon": -17.4677, "status": "starter_profile_source_linking_needed", "overall_risk_score": 86, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 10, "demand_origins": [ "France", "colonial army" ], "presence_type": [ "colonial military", "demobilization control" ], "abuse_types": [ "massacre", "veteran-rights abuse", "memory suppression" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "France / Senegal Thiaroye massacre and military-pension accountability is included as a public-risk starter record. It requires public-source linking, source classification, right-of-reply routing and reviewer synthesis before final adverse legal wording. The record exists to make the demand origin, beneficiary chain, remedy gaps, dismissed complaints and continuity pattern visible.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "Thiaroye", "colonial troops", "pension injustice", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-FRANCE-MOROCCO-RIF-WAR-AND-CHEMICAL-WEAPONS-ALLEGATION-MATRIX", "title": "France / Morocco Rif war and chemical-weapons allegation matrix", "country": "Morocco / France / Spain", "region": "North Africa / Europe", "lat": 35.0, "lon": -3.9, "status": "starter_profile_source_linking_needed", "overall_risk_score": 84, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 11, "demand_origins": [ "France", "Spain", "colonial counterinsurgency" ], "presence_type": [ "colonial war", "chemical-weapons allegation" ], "abuse_types": [ "civilian harm", "toxic exposure allegation", "memory gap" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "France / Morocco Rif war and chemical-weapons allegation matrix is included as a public-risk starter record. It requires public-source linking, source classification, right-of-reply routing and reviewer synthesis before final adverse legal wording. The record exists to make the demand origin, beneficiary chain, remedy gaps, dismissed complaints and continuity pattern visible.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "Rif war", "chemical allegation", "colonial warfare", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-SPAIN-MOROCCO-RIF-WAR-CHEMICAL-WEAPONS-ACCOUNTABILITY-PATTERN", "title": "Spain / Morocco Rif war chemical-weapons accountability pattern", "country": "Morocco / Spain", "region": "North Africa / Europe", "lat": 35.0, "lon": -3.5, "status": "starter_profile_source_linking_needed", "overall_risk_score": 84, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 11, "demand_origins": [ "Spain", "colonial control" ], "presence_type": [ "colonial air war", "chemical-weapons allegation" ], "abuse_types": [ "civilian harm", "toxic exposure allegation", "accountability evasion" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Spain / Morocco Rif war chemical-weapons accountability pattern is included as a public-risk starter record. It requires public-source linking, source classification, right-of-reply routing and reviewer synthesis before final adverse legal wording. The record exists to make the demand origin, beneficiary chain, remedy gaps, dismissed complaints and continuity pattern visible.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "Rif war", "chemical warfare allegation", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-FRANCE-R-UNION-CHILD-RELOCATION-SCANDAL-AND-SOCIAL-ENGINEERING-PATTERN", "title": "France / Réunion child relocation scandal and social-engineering pattern", "country": "Réunion / France", "region": "Indian Ocean / Europe", "lat": -21.1151, "lon": 55.5364, "status": "starter_profile_source_linking_needed", "overall_risk_score": 76, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 19, "demand_origins": [ "France", "assimilation policy" ], "presence_type": [ "child relocation", "state social policy" ], "abuse_types": [ "family separation", "cultural harm", "accountability gap" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "France / Réunion child relocation scandal and social-engineering pattern is included as a public-risk starter record. It requires public-source linking, source classification, right-of-reply routing and reviewer synthesis before final adverse legal wording. The record exists to make the demand origin, beneficiary chain, remedy gaps, dismissed complaints and continuity pattern visible.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "child displacement", "assimilation", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-FRANCE-KANAKY-NEW-CALEDONIA-NICKEL-REPRESSION-AND-SELF-DETERMINATION-RISK", "title": "France / Kanaky New Caledonia nickel, repression and self-determination risk", "country": "Kanaky / France", "region": "Pacific / Europe", "lat": -20.9043, "lon": 165.618, "status": "starter_profile_source_linking_needed", "overall_risk_score": 82, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 13, "demand_origins": [ "France", "nickel demand", "strategic Pacific control" ], "presence_type": [ "military policing", "resource control", "colonial status" ], "abuse_types": [ "self-determination denial", "resource capture", "repression risk" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "France / Kanaky New Caledonia nickel, repression and self-determination risk is included as a public-risk starter record. It requires public-source linking, source classification, right-of-reply routing and reviewer synthesis before final adverse legal wording. The record exists to make the demand origin, beneficiary chain, remedy gaps, dismissed complaints and continuity pattern visible.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "nickel", "self-determination", "colonial status", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-FRANCE-FRENCH-GUIANA-SPACEPORT-AND-TERRITORIAL-EXTRACTION-RISK", "title": "France / French Guiana spaceport and territorial-extraction risk", "country": "French Guiana / France / EU", "region": "South America / Europe", "lat": 3.9339, "lon": -53.1258, "status": "starter_profile_source_linking_needed", "overall_risk_score": 70, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 25, "demand_origins": [ "France", "European space industry" ], "presence_type": [ "spaceport", "territorial dependency", "security control" ], "abuse_types": [ "land control", "benefit exclusion", "colonial status" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "France / French Guiana spaceport and territorial-extraction risk is included as a public-risk starter record. It requires public-source linking, source classification, right-of-reply routing and reviewer synthesis before final adverse legal wording. The record exists to make the demand origin, beneficiary chain, remedy gaps, dismissed complaints and continuity pattern visible.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "spaceport", "territorial dependency", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-FRANCE-MALI-OPERATION-SERVAL-BARKHANE-CIVILIAN-HARM-AND-SOVEREIGNTY-RISK-PROFILE", "title": "France / Mali Operation Serval-Barkhane civilian-harm and sovereignty-risk profile", "country": "Mali / France", "region": "Sahel / Europe", "lat": 17.5707, "lon": -3.9962, "status": "starter_profile_source_linking_needed", "overall_risk_score": 86, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 10, "demand_origins": [ "France", "Sahel security policy" ], "presence_type": [ "counterterrorism operation", "base presence", "intelligence" ], "abuse_types": [ "civilian-harm allegation", "sovereignty pressure", "accountability gap" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "France / Mali Operation Serval-Barkhane civilian-harm and sovereignty-risk profile is included as a public-risk starter record. It requires public-source linking, source classification, right-of-reply routing and reviewer synthesis before final adverse legal wording. The record exists to make the demand origin, beneficiary chain, remedy gaps, dismissed complaints and continuity pattern visible.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "Barkhane", "Sahel", "counterterrorism", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-FRANCE-CENTRAL-AFRICAN-REPUBLIC-OPERATION-SANGARIS-ABUSE-ALLEGATION-PATTERN", "title": "France / Central African Republic Operation Sangaris abuse allegation pattern", "country": "CAR / France", "region": "Central Africa / Europe", "lat": 6.6111, "lon": 20.9394, "status": "starter_profile_source_linking_needed", "overall_risk_score": 84, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 11, "demand_origins": [ "France", "UN/foreign mission structures" ], "presence_type": [ "foreign military mission", "peacekeeping-adjacent operations" ], "abuse_types": [ "child sexual abuse allegations", "accountability evasion", "civilian protection failure" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "France / Central African Republic Operation Sangaris abuse allegation pattern is included as a public-risk starter record. It requires public-source linking, source classification, right-of-reply routing and reviewer synthesis before final adverse legal wording. The record exists to make the demand origin, beneficiary chain, remedy gaps, dismissed complaints and continuity pattern visible.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "Sangaris", "child protection", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-UNITED-KINGDOM-SOUTH-AFRICA-CONCENTRATION-CAMPS-AND-CIVILIAN-STARVATION-PATTERN", "title": "United Kingdom / South Africa concentration camps and civilian-starvation pattern", "country": "South Africa / United Kingdom", "region": "Southern Africa / Europe", "lat": -30.5595, "lon": 22.9375, "status": "starter_profile_source_linking_needed", "overall_risk_score": 88, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 10, "demand_origins": [ "United Kingdom", "settler war" ], "presence_type": [ "concentration camps", "scorched earth" ], "abuse_types": [ "civilian death", "child mortality", "population control" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "United Kingdom / South Africa concentration camps and civilian-starvation pattern is included as a public-risk starter record. It requires public-source linking, source classification, right-of-reply routing and reviewer synthesis before final adverse legal wording. The record exists to make the demand origin, beneficiary chain, remedy gaps, dismissed complaints and continuity pattern visible.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "concentration camps", "settler war", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-UNITED-KINGDOM-BENGAL-FAMINE-POLICY-AND-IMPERIAL-EXTRACTION", "title": "United Kingdom / Bengal famine policy and imperial extraction", "country": "Bengal / United Kingdom", "region": "Asia / Europe", "lat": 23.685, "lon": 90.3563, "status": "starter_profile_source_linking_needed", "overall_risk_score": 92, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 10, "demand_origins": [ "United Kingdom", "imperial war economy" ], "presence_type": [ "famine policy", "grain extraction", "colonial administration" ], "abuse_types": [ "mass starvation", "food export", "accountability evasion" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "United Kingdom / Bengal famine policy and imperial extraction is included as a public-risk starter record. It requires public-source linking, source classification, right-of-reply routing and reviewer synthesis before final adverse legal wording. The record exists to make the demand origin, beneficiary chain, remedy gaps, dismissed complaints and continuity pattern visible.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "famine", "imperial extraction", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-BELGIUM-RWANDA-BURUNDI-ETHNIC-ENGINEERING-AND-INDIRECT-RULE-CONTINUITY", "title": "Belgium / Rwanda-Burundi ethnic engineering and indirect-rule continuity", "country": "Rwanda / Burundi / Belgium", "region": "Great Lakes / Europe", "lat": -2.0, "lon": 30.0, "status": "starter_profile_source_linking_needed", "overall_risk_score": 86, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 10, "demand_origins": [ "Belgium", "colonial administration" ], "presence_type": [ "indirect rule", "identity documents", "elite engineering" ], "abuse_types": [ "ethnic stratification", "genocide risk legacy", "social fracture" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Belgium / Rwanda-Burundi ethnic engineering and indirect-rule continuity is included as a public-risk starter record. It requires public-source linking, source classification, right-of-reply routing and reviewer synthesis before final adverse legal wording. The record exists to make the demand origin, beneficiary chain, remedy gaps, dismissed complaints and continuity pattern visible.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "identity engineering", "indirect rule", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-GERMANY-TANZANIA-MAJI-MAJI-REPRESSION-AND-FAMINE-PATTERN", "title": "Germany / Tanzania Maji Maji repression and famine pattern", "country": "Tanzania / Germany", "region": "East Africa / Europe", "lat": -6.369, "lon": 34.8888, "status": "starter_profile_source_linking_needed", "overall_risk_score": 86, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 10, "demand_origins": [ "Germany", "colonial plantation order" ], "presence_type": [ "colonial war", "scorched earth" ], "abuse_types": [ "mass death", "famine", "forced labor" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Germany / Tanzania Maji Maji repression and famine pattern is included as a public-risk starter record. It requires public-source linking, source classification, right-of-reply routing and reviewer synthesis before final adverse legal wording. The record exists to make the demand origin, beneficiary chain, remedy gaps, dismissed complaints and continuity pattern visible.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "Maji Maji", "scorched earth", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-ITALY-ETHIOPIA-MUSTARD-GAS-INVASION-ACCOUNTABILITY-PATTERN", "title": "Italy / Ethiopia mustard-gas invasion accountability pattern", "country": "Ethiopia / Italy", "region": "Horn of Africa / Europe", "lat": 9.145, "lon": 40.4897, "status": "starter_profile_source_linking_needed", "overall_risk_score": 90, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 10, "demand_origins": [ "Italy", "fascist colonial empire" ], "presence_type": [ "invasion", "chemical warfare" ], "abuse_types": [ "civilian harm", "chemical exposure", "massacre" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Italy / Ethiopia mustard-gas invasion accountability pattern is included as a public-risk starter record. It requires public-source linking, source classification, right-of-reply routing and reviewer synthesis before final adverse legal wording. The record exists to make the demand origin, beneficiary chain, remedy gaps, dismissed complaints and continuity pattern visible.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "mustard gas", "fascist colonialism", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-UNITED-STATES-IRAN-1953-COUP-AND-OIL-SOVEREIGNTY-SUPPRESSION", "title": "United States / Iran 1953 coup and oil-sovereignty suppression", "country": "Iran / United States / United Kingdom", "region": "Middle East / US/Europe", "lat": 32.4279, "lon": 53.688, "status": "starter_profile_source_linking_needed", "overall_risk_score": 86, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 10, "demand_origins": [ "United States", "United Kingdom", "oil interests" ], "presence_type": [ "coup", "intelligence operation", "oil politics" ], "abuse_types": [ "sovereignty suppression", "dictatorship support", "accountability evasion" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "United States / Iran 1953 coup and oil-sovereignty suppression is included as a public-risk starter record. It requires public-source linking, source classification, right-of-reply routing and reviewer synthesis before final adverse legal wording. The record exists to make the demand origin, beneficiary chain, remedy gaps, dismissed complaints and continuity pattern visible.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "oil coup", "CIA/MI6", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-UNITED-STATES-CONGO-LUMUMBA-ASSASSINATION-AND-MINERAL-GEOPOLITICAL-PATTERN", "title": "United States / Congo Lumumba assassination and mineral-geopolitical pattern", "country": "DRC / United States / Belgium", "region": "Central Africa / US/Europe", "lat": -2.8799, "lon": 23.6564, "status": "starter_profile_source_linking_needed", "overall_risk_score": 92, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 10, "demand_origins": [ "United States", "Belgium", "mineral/geopolitical interests" ], "presence_type": [ "intelligence operation", "regime engineering" ], "abuse_types": [ "political assassination", "sovereignty destruction", "resource capture" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "United States / Congo Lumumba assassination and mineral-geopolitical pattern is included as a public-risk starter record. It requires public-source linking, source classification, right-of-reply routing and reviewer synthesis before final adverse legal wording. The record exists to make the demand origin, beneficiary chain, remedy gaps, dismissed complaints and continuity pattern visible.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "Lumumba", "regime engineering", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-UNITED-STATES-NICARAGUA-CONTRA-WAR-AND-ACCOUNTABILITY-EVASION", "title": "United States / Nicaragua Contra war and accountability evasion", "country": "Nicaragua / United States", "region": "Latin America / US", "lat": 12.8654, "lon": -85.2072, "status": "starter_profile_source_linking_needed", "overall_risk_score": 86, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 10, "demand_origins": [ "United States", "anti-Sandinista policy" ], "presence_type": [ "proxy war", "covert funding" ], "abuse_types": [ "civilian harm", "terror tactics allegation", "accountability evasion" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "United States / Nicaragua Contra war and accountability evasion is included as a public-risk starter record. It requires public-source linking, source classification, right-of-reply routing and reviewer synthesis before final adverse legal wording. The record exists to make the demand origin, beneficiary chain, remedy gaps, dismissed complaints and continuity pattern visible.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "Contra war", "proxy force", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-UNITED-STATES-CUBA-EMBARGO-AND-PUBLIC-HEALTH-ECONOMIC-COERCION-PATTERN", "title": "United States / Cuba embargo and public-health/economic coercion pattern", "country": "Cuba / United States", "region": "Caribbean / US", "lat": 21.5218, "lon": -77.7812, "status": "starter_profile_source_linking_needed", "overall_risk_score": 80, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 15, "demand_origins": [ "United States", "regime-change policy" ], "presence_type": [ "sanctions/embargo", "financial isolation" ], "abuse_types": [ "medicine shortages", "economic coercion", "collective punishment risk" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "United States / Cuba embargo and public-health/economic coercion pattern is included as a public-risk starter record. It requires public-source linking, source classification, right-of-reply routing and reviewer synthesis before final adverse legal wording. The record exists to make the demand origin, beneficiary chain, remedy gaps, dismissed complaints and continuity pattern visible.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "embargo", "economic coercion", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-UNITED-STATES-HAITI-OCCUPATION-1915-1934-AND-DEBT-CONTROL-PATTERN", "title": "United States / Haiti occupation 1915-1934 and debt-control pattern", "country": "Haiti / United States", "region": "Caribbean / US", "lat": 18.9712, "lon": -72.2852, "status": "starter_profile_source_linking_needed", "overall_risk_score": 88, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 10, "demand_origins": [ "United States", "banking/debt interests", "Caribbean control" ], "presence_type": [ "occupation", "customs control", "forced labor" ], "abuse_types": [ "sovereignty seizure", "forced labor", "debt control" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "United States / Haiti occupation 1915-1934 and debt-control pattern is included as a public-risk starter record. It requires public-source linking, source classification, right-of-reply routing and reviewer synthesis before final adverse legal wording. The record exists to make the demand origin, beneficiary chain, remedy gaps, dismissed complaints and continuity pattern visible.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "occupation", "customs control", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-UNITED-STATES-PUERTO-RICO-STERILIZATION-AND-REPRODUCTIVE-CONTROL-PATTERN", "title": "United States / Puerto Rico sterilization and reproductive-control pattern", "country": "Puerto Rico / United States", "region": "Caribbean / US", "lat": 18.2208, "lon": -66.5901, "status": "starter_profile_source_linking_needed", "overall_risk_score": 82, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 13, "demand_origins": [ "United States", "population-control ideology" ], "presence_type": [ "medical system", "colonial administration" ], "abuse_types": [ "coerced sterilization allegation", "reproductive harm", "consent failure" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "United States / Puerto Rico sterilization and reproductive-control pattern is included as a public-risk starter record. It requires public-source linking, source classification, right-of-reply routing and reviewer synthesis before final adverse legal wording. The record exists to make the demand origin, beneficiary chain, remedy gaps, dismissed complaints and continuity pattern visible.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "sterilization", "population control", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-UNITED-STATES-FLINT-WATER-CRISIS-AND-BLACK-CITY-INFRASTRUCTURE-HARM", "title": "United States / Flint water crisis and Black-city infrastructure harm", "country": "Flint / United States", "region": "North America", "lat": 43.0125, "lon": -83.6875, "status": "starter_profile_source_linking_needed", "overall_risk_score": 78, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 17, "demand_origins": [ "austerity governance", "state emergency management" ], "presence_type": [ "water system", "municipal austerity" ], "abuse_types": [ "lead poisoning", "environmental racism", "public-health harm" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "United States / Flint water crisis and Black-city infrastructure harm is included as a public-risk starter record. It requires public-source linking, source classification, right-of-reply routing and reviewer synthesis before final adverse legal wording. The record exists to make the demand origin, beneficiary chain, remedy gaps, dismissed complaints and continuity pattern visible.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "Flint", "water racism", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-UNITED-STATES-TUSKEGEE-SYPHILIS-STUDY-AND-MEDICAL-RACISM-BASELINE", "title": "United States / Tuskegee syphilis study and medical racism baseline", "country": "United States / Black communities", "region": "North America", "lat": 32.4302, "lon": -85.7077, "status": "starter_profile_source_linking_needed", "overall_risk_score": 90, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 10, "demand_origins": [ "US public-health institutions", "racial science history" ], "presence_type": [ "medical study", "state health system" ], "abuse_types": [ "medical exploitation", "consent failure", "Black harm" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "United States / Tuskegee syphilis study and medical racism baseline is included as a public-risk starter record. It requires public-source linking, source classification, right-of-reply routing and reviewer synthesis before final adverse legal wording. The record exists to make the demand origin, beneficiary chain, remedy gaps, dismissed complaints and continuity pattern visible.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "Tuskegee", "medical racism", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-UNITED-STATES-HENRIETTA-LACKS-AND-BIOLOGICAL-SAMPLE-EXTRACTION", "title": "United States / Henrietta Lacks and biological-sample extraction", "country": "United States / Black communities", "region": "North America", "lat": 39.2904, "lon": -76.6122, "status": "starter_profile_source_linking_needed", "overall_risk_score": 78, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 17, "demand_origins": [ "medical research institutions", "biotech value chain" ], "presence_type": [ "biological sample extraction", "research commercialization" ], "abuse_types": [ "consent failure", "biological data extraction", "benefit exclusion" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "United States / Henrietta Lacks and biological-sample extraction is included as a public-risk starter record. It requires public-source linking, source classification, right-of-reply routing and reviewer synthesis before final adverse legal wording. The record exists to make the demand origin, beneficiary chain, remedy gaps, dismissed complaints and continuity pattern visible.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "HeLa", "bioextraction", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-UNITED-STATES-MOVE-BOMBING-AND-BLACK-LIBERATION-REPRESSION", "title": "United States / MOVE bombing and Black liberation repression", "country": "Philadelphia / United States", "region": "North America", "lat": 39.9526, "lon": -75.1652, "status": "starter_profile_source_linking_needed", "overall_risk_score": 84, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 11, "demand_origins": [ "state police power", "Black liberation repression" ], "presence_type": [ "police bombing", "urban counterinsurgency" ], "abuse_types": [ "civilian death", "community destruction", "accountability gap" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "United States / MOVE bombing and Black liberation repression is included as a public-risk starter record. It requires public-source linking, source classification, right-of-reply routing and reviewer synthesis before final adverse legal wording. The record exists to make the demand origin, beneficiary chain, remedy gaps, dismissed complaints and continuity pattern visible.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "MOVE bombing", "Black repression", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-UNITED-STATES-LOUISIANA-PRISON-LABOR-AND-SLAVERY-CONTINUITY-PATTERN", "title": "United States / Louisiana prison labor and slavery-continuity pattern", "country": "Louisiana / United States", "region": "North America", "lat": 30.9843, "lon": -91.9623, "status": "starter_profile_source_linking_needed", "overall_risk_score": 78, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 17, "demand_origins": [ "carceral labor demand", "plantation legacy" ], "presence_type": [ "prison labor", "plantation prison" ], "abuse_types": [ "forced labor", "racialized incarceration", "economic extraction" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "United States / Louisiana prison labor and slavery-continuity pattern is included as a public-risk starter record. It requires public-source linking, source classification, right-of-reply routing and reviewer synthesis before final adverse legal wording. The record exists to make the demand origin, beneficiary chain, remedy gaps, dismissed complaints and continuity pattern visible.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "Angola prison", "prison slavery", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-ISRAEL-WEST-BANK-SETTLEMENTS-AND-LAND-WATER-REPLACEMENT-PATTERN", "title": "Israel / West Bank settlements and land-water replacement pattern", "country": "Palestine / Israel", "region": "Middle East", "lat": 31.9466, "lon": 35.3027, "status": "starter_profile_source_linking_needed", "overall_risk_score": 92, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 10, "demand_origins": [ "Israel", "settler movement", "Western diplomatic cover" ], "presence_type": [ "settlement expansion", "land law", "water control" ], "abuse_types": [ "land dispossession", "population replacement", "movement restrictions" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Israel / West Bank settlements and land-water replacement pattern is included as a public-risk starter record. It requires public-source linking, source classification, right-of-reply routing and reviewer synthesis before final adverse legal wording. The record exists to make the demand origin, beneficiary chain, remedy gaps, dismissed complaints and continuity pattern visible.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "settlements", "water control", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-UNITED-STATES-LAOS-SECRET-WAR-AND-UNEXPLODED-ORDNANCE-PATTERN", "title": "United States / Laos secret war and unexploded ordnance pattern", "country": "Laos / United States", "region": "Asia / US", "lat": 19.8563, "lon": 102.4955, "status": "starter_profile_source_linking_needed", "overall_risk_score": 86, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 10, "demand_origins": [ "United States", "anti-communist war strategy" ], "presence_type": [ "secret bombing", "covert war" ], "abuse_types": [ "civilian harm", "unexploded ordnance", "intergenerational injury" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "United States / Laos secret war and unexploded ordnance pattern is included as a public-risk starter record. It requires public-source linking, source classification, right-of-reply routing and reviewer synthesis before final adverse legal wording. The record exists to make the demand origin, beneficiary chain, remedy gaps, dismissed complaints and continuity pattern visible.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "secret war", "UXO", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-JAPAN-UNIT-731-BIOLOGICAL-EXPERIMENTATION-ACCOUNTABILITY-PATTERN", "title": "Japan / Unit 731 biological experimentation accountability pattern", "country": "China / Japan", "region": "Asia", "lat": 45.8038, "lon": 126.535, "status": "starter_profile_source_linking_needed", "overall_risk_score": 92, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 10, "demand_origins": [ "Imperial Japan", "biowarfare program" ], "presence_type": [ "biological experimentation", "military research" ], "abuse_types": [ "human experimentation", "biological warfare", "accountability evasion" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Japan / Unit 731 biological experimentation accountability pattern is included as a public-risk starter record. It requires public-source linking, source classification, right-of-reply routing and reviewer synthesis before final adverse legal wording. The record exists to make the demand origin, beneficiary chain, remedy gaps, dismissed complaints and continuity pattern visible.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "biowarfare", "human experimentation", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-OK-TEDI-MINE-POLLUTION-AND-RIVER-DESTRUCTION-PATTERN", "title": "Ok Tedi mine pollution and river destruction pattern", "country": "Papua New Guinea / mining companies", "region": "Pacific", "lat": -5.27, "lon": 141.22, "status": "starter_profile_source_linking_needed", "overall_risk_score": 80, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 15, "demand_origins": [ "mining companies", "global copper/gold markets" ], "presence_type": [ "mine tailings", "river dumping" ], "abuse_types": [ "water pollution", "livelihood destruction", "corporate accountability" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Ok Tedi mine pollution and river destruction pattern is included as a public-risk starter record. It requires public-source linking, source classification, right-of-reply routing and reviewer synthesis before final adverse legal wording. The record exists to make the demand origin, beneficiary chain, remedy gaps, dismissed complaints and continuity pattern visible.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "river dumping", "mine tailings", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-VALE-BRUMADINHO-DAM-COLLAPSE-AND-MINING-ACCOUNTABILITY", "title": "Vale / Brumadinho dam collapse and mining accountability", "country": "Brazil / Vale / global iron markets", "region": "Latin America", "lat": -20.129, "lon": -44.121, "status": "starter_profile_source_linking_needed", "overall_risk_score": 82, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 13, "demand_origins": [ "Vale", "global iron ore markets" ], "presence_type": [ "tailings dam", "mining operations" ], "abuse_types": [ "mass death", "toxic mud", "corporate negligence allegation" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Vale / Brumadinho dam collapse and mining accountability is included as a public-risk starter record. It requires public-source linking, source classification, right-of-reply routing and reviewer synthesis before final adverse legal wording. The record exists to make the demand origin, beneficiary chain, remedy gaps, dismissed complaints and continuity pattern visible.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "tailings dam", "mining disaster", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-TOTALENERGIES-UGANDA-TANZANIA-EACOP-DISPLACEMENT-AND-CLIMATE-RISK-PATTERN", "title": "TotalEnergies / Uganda-Tanzania EACOP displacement and climate-risk pattern", "country": "Uganda / Tanzania / France", "region": "East Africa / Europe", "lat": 1.3733, "lon": 32.2903, "status": "starter_profile_source_linking_needed", "overall_risk_score": 78, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 17, "demand_origins": [ "TotalEnergies", "oil markets", "French corporate capital" ], "presence_type": [ "pipeline", "land acquisition", "oil extraction" ], "abuse_types": [ "displacement", "livelihood harm", "climate risk", "defender intimidation" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "TotalEnergies / Uganda-Tanzania EACOP displacement and climate-risk pattern is included as a public-risk starter record. It requires public-source linking, source classification, right-of-reply routing and reviewer synthesis before final adverse legal wording. The record exists to make the demand origin, beneficiary chain, remedy gaps, dismissed complaints and continuity pattern visible.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "EACOP", "pipeline displacement", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-MOZAMBIQUE-LNG-CABO-DELGADO-SECURITY-AND-DISPLACEMENT-PATTERN", "title": "Mozambique LNG / Cabo Delgado security and displacement pattern", "country": "Mozambique / TotalEnergies / gas markets", "region": "Southern Africa", "lat": -12.333, "lon": 40.5, "status": "starter_profile_source_linking_needed", "overall_risk_score": 84, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 11, "demand_origins": [ "TotalEnergies", "gas markets", "security forces" ], "presence_type": [ "LNG project", "security deployment", "resource corridor" ], "abuse_types": [ "displacement", "civilian harm", "militarization", "contractor risk" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Mozambique LNG / Cabo Delgado security and displacement pattern is included as a public-risk starter record. It requires public-source linking, source classification, right-of-reply routing and reviewer synthesis before final adverse legal wording. The record exists to make the demand origin, beneficiary chain, remedy gaps, dismissed complaints and continuity pattern visible.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "LNG", "resource security", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-THAILAND-SEAFOOD-SLAVERY-AND-GLOBAL-SUPERMARKET-DEMAND", "title": "Thailand / seafood slavery and global supermarket demand", "country": "Thailand / global seafood markets", "region": "Asia", "lat": 15.87, "lon": 100.9925, "status": "starter_profile_source_linking_needed", "overall_risk_score": 78, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 17, "demand_origins": [ "US/EU seafood demand", "retail supply chains" ], "presence_type": [ "fishing fleets", "seafood processing" ], "abuse_types": [ "forced labor", "trafficking", "debt bondage" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Thailand / seafood slavery and global supermarket demand is included as a public-risk starter record. It requires public-source linking, source classification, right-of-reply routing and reviewer synthesis before final adverse legal wording. The record exists to make the demand origin, beneficiary chain, remedy gaps, dismissed complaints and continuity pattern visible.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "seafood slavery", "retail demand", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-AUSTRALIA-OFFSHORE-DETENTION-NAURU-MANUS-ABUSE-PATTERN", "title": "Australia / offshore detention Nauru-Manus abuse pattern", "country": "Australia / Nauru / PNG", "region": "Oceania", "lat": -0.5228, "lon": 166.9315, "status": "starter_profile_source_linking_needed", "overall_risk_score": 84, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 11, "demand_origins": [ "Australia", "border deterrence demand" ], "presence_type": [ "offshore detention", "private contractors" ], "abuse_types": [ "self-harm risk", "child detention", "abuse allegations", "legal outsourcing" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Australia / offshore detention Nauru-Manus abuse pattern is included as a public-risk starter record. It requires public-source linking, source classification, right-of-reply routing and reviewer synthesis before final adverse legal wording. The record exists to make the demand origin, beneficiary chain, remedy gaps, dismissed complaints and continuity pattern visible.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "offshore detention", "border outsourcing", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-GHANA-E-WASTE-DUMPING-AT-AGBOGBLOSHIE-AND-TOXIC-DIGITAL-COLONIALISM-PATTERN", "title": "Ghana / e-waste dumping at Agbogbloshie and toxic digital-colonialism pattern", "country": "Ghana / global electronics markets", "region": "West Africa", "lat": 5.6037, "lon": -0.187, "status": "starter_profile_source_linking_needed", "overall_risk_score": 78, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 17, "demand_origins": [ "EU/US electronics waste streams", "global tech consumption" ], "presence_type": [ "e-waste recycling", "informal labor", "toxic dumping" ], "abuse_types": [ "toxic exposure", "child labor risk", "water/soil pollution", "digital waste colonialism" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Ghana / e-waste dumping at Agbogbloshie and toxic digital-colonialism pattern is included as a public-risk starter record. It requires public-source linking, source classification, right-of-reply routing and reviewer synthesis before final adverse legal wording. The record exists to make the demand origin, beneficiary chain, remedy gaps, dismissed complaints and continuity pattern visible.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "e-waste", "digital colonialism", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-FRENCH-NUCLEAR-TESTING-IN-ALGERIA-AND-POLYNESIA", "title": "French nuclear testing in Algeria and Polynesia", "country": "Algeria / French Polynesia / France", "region": "Africa / Pacific / Europe", "lat": -17.6797, "lon": -149.4068, "status": "starter_profile_source_linking_needed", "overall_risk_score": 90, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 10, "demand_origins": [ "France", "nuclear weapons strategy" ], "presence_type": [ "nuclear testing", "colonial test sites", "military secrecy" ], "abuse_types": [ "radiation exposure", "land contamination", "intergenerational harm", "accountability evasion" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "French nuclear testing in Algeria and Polynesia is included as a public-risk starter record. It requires public-source linking, source classification, right-of-reply routing and reviewer synthesis before final adverse legal wording. The record exists to make the demand origin, beneficiary chain, remedy gaps, dismissed complaints and continuity pattern visible.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "nuclear colonialism", "radiation", "sacrifice zones", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-BRITISH-NUCLEAR-TESTING-IN-AUSTRALIA-AND-PACIFIC", "title": "British nuclear testing in Australia and Pacific", "country": "Australia / Pacific / United Kingdom", "region": "Oceania / Europe", "lat": -25.2744, "lon": 133.7751, "status": "starter_profile_source_linking_needed", "overall_risk_score": 86, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 10, "demand_origins": [ "United Kingdom", "nuclear weapons strategy" ], "presence_type": [ "nuclear testing", "Indigenous lands", "military secrecy" ], "abuse_types": [ "radiation exposure", "land contamination", "Indigenous harm" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "British nuclear testing in Australia and Pacific is included as a public-risk starter record. It requires public-source linking, source classification, right-of-reply routing and reviewer synthesis before final adverse legal wording. The record exists to make the demand origin, beneficiary chain, remedy gaps, dismissed complaints and continuity pattern visible.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "nuclear testing", "Indigenous harm", "military secrecy", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-MEDITERRANEAN-NGO-RESCUE-CRIMINALIZATION-AND-DEATH-BY-DETERRENCE", "title": "Mediterranean / NGO rescue criminalization and death-by-deterrence", "country": "Mediterranean / EU states", "region": "Europe / Africa", "lat": 35.0, "lon": 18.0, "status": "starter_profile_source_linking_needed", "overall_risk_score": 78, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 17, "demand_origins": [ "EU border politics", "anti-migration parties" ], "presence_type": [ "rescue obstruction", "legal intimidation" ], "abuse_types": [ "migrant deaths", "criminalization of solidarity", "accountability evasion" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Mediterranean / NGO rescue criminalization and death-by-deterrence is included as a public-risk starter record. It requires public-source linking, source classification, right-of-reply routing and reviewer synthesis before final adverse legal wording. The record exists to make the demand origin, beneficiary chain, remedy gaps, dismissed complaints and continuity pattern visible.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "rescue criminalization", "deterrence", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-VACCINE-NATIONALISM-AND-UNEQUAL-ACCESS-MORTALITY-RISK-PATTERN", "title": "Vaccine nationalism and unequal access mortality-risk pattern", "country": "Global South / pharma states", "region": "Global", "lat": 0.0, "lon": 20.0, "status": "starter_profile_source_linking_needed", "overall_risk_score": 74, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 21, "demand_origins": [ "pharma companies", "wealthy states" ], "presence_type": [ "vaccine patents", "procurement power" ], "abuse_types": [ "avoidable mortality", "access inequality", "IP capture" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Vaccine nationalism and unequal access mortality-risk pattern is included as a public-risk starter record. It requires public-source linking, source classification, right-of-reply routing and reviewer synthesis before final adverse legal wording. The record exists to make the demand origin, beneficiary chain, remedy gaps, dismissed complaints and continuity pattern visible.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "vaccine nationalism", "IP", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-ACADEMIC-EXTRACTIVISM-AND-GLOBAL-SOUTH-DATA-APPROPRIATION", "title": "Academic extractivism and Global South data appropriation", "country": "Global South / Western universities", "region": "Global", "lat": 0.0, "lon": 20.0, "status": "starter_profile_source_linking_needed", "overall_risk_score": 66, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 29, "demand_origins": [ "Western universities", "funders", "publishers" ], "presence_type": [ "field research", "data extraction" ], "abuse_types": [ "authorship exclusion", "data theft", "epistemic harm" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Academic extractivism and Global South data appropriation is included as a public-risk starter record. It requires public-source linking, source classification, right-of-reply routing and reviewer synthesis before final adverse legal wording. The record exists to make the demand origin, beneficiary chain, remedy gaps, dismissed complaints and continuity pattern visible.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "academic extractivism", "data", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-AI-TRAINING-DATA-EXTRACTION-AND-LANGUAGE-CULTURE-APPROPRIATION-MATRIX", "title": "AI training data extraction and language/culture appropriation matrix", "country": "Global South / AI companies", "region": "Global", "lat": 0.0, "lon": 20.0, "status": "starter_profile_source_linking_needed", "overall_risk_score": 70, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 25, "demand_origins": [ "AI companies", "data brokers" ], "presence_type": [ "AI training data", "scraping", "language datasets" ], "abuse_types": [ "cultural appropriation", "data extraction", "benefit exclusion" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "AI training data extraction and language/culture appropriation matrix is included as a public-risk starter record. It requires public-source linking, source classification, right-of-reply routing and reviewer synthesis before final adverse legal wording. The record exists to make the demand origin, beneficiary chain, remedy gaps, dismissed complaints and continuity pattern visible.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "AI data", "language extraction", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-SENEGAL-2025-FRENCH-MILITARY-BASE-HANDOVER-RESIDUAL-OFFICERS-AND-SOVEREIGNTY-AUDIT-CASE", "title": "Senegal 2025 — French military base handover, residual officers and sovereignty-audit case", "country": "Senegal / France", "region": "West Africa / Europe", "lat": 14.7167, "lon": -17.4677, "status": "completed_starter_public_source_packet_needed", "overall_risk_score": 76, "evidence_strength": 70, "trust_index": 30, "demand_origins": [ "France", "French defence network", "Senegalese sovereignty demand" ], "presence_type": [ "base handover", "military cooperation", "training residuals", "post-base influence" ], "abuse_types": [ "residual influence risk", "jurisdiction opacity", "public-accountability need" ], "chronology": "2025-present", "plain_diagnosis": "France's 2025 handover of its remaining military sites in Senegal is a useful recent test case. It may mark progress toward sovereignty, but the public record should still examine residual officers, training roles, archives, base assets, employment transition, communications facilities and any continuing defence clauses.", "risk_logic": "A base handover is not automatically full strategic exit. Public trust requires clause-level review, inventory of transferred assets, remaining personnel disclosure, and proof that residual cooperation cannot reproduce command, intelligence or influence dependence.", "safe_actions": [ "Create or update the public-source packet with UN/HDX, OCHA, OHCHR, ACLED/HDX, NGO, court, audit and press anchors where available.", "Classify the claim state: established public fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis, or protected-review-only.", "Add testimony and survivor/witness accounts only through protected review; never publish identifying details in the public layer.", "Identify the demand origin, funder, sponsor, arms supplier, border-control sponsor, commodity buyer or institutional beneficiary.", "Request right of reply, public records, independent investigation, remedy and preservation of evidence." ], "source_links": [ { "label": "Le Monde: France begins handover of military bases to Senegal", "url": "https://www.lemonde.fr/en/le-monde-africa/article/2025/03/07/france-begins-handover-of-military-bases-in-senegal_6738927_124.html" }, { "label": "Le Monde: France returns military base to Senegal, July 2025", "url": "https://www.lemonde.fr/en/international/article/2025/07/01/france-returns-military-base-to-senegal-as-part-of-broader-withdrawal_6742918_4.html" } ], "pattern_flags": [ "Senegal 2025", "French base handover", "residual influence", "completed starter", "public-source packet needed", "testimony-sensitive review" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-GAZA-HUMANITARIAN-ACCESS-OBSTRUCTION-STARVATION-RISK-AND-AID-WORKER-PROTECTION-PROFILE", "title": "Gaza — humanitarian access obstruction, starvation-risk and aid-worker protection profile", "country": "Palestine / Israel / arms-supplier states", "region": "Middle East / Global", "lat": 31.5, "lon": 34.47, "status": "completed_starter_public_source_packet_needed", "overall_risk_score": 96, "evidence_strength": 84, "trust_index": 8, "demand_origins": [ "Israel", "United States", "European arms/diplomatic cover", "aid-gate control" ], "presence_type": [ "siege", "aid restrictions", "military operations", "arms supply" ], "abuse_types": [ "starvation risk", "aid obstruction", "aid worker deaths", "hospital harm", "civilian displacement" ], "chronology": "2023-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Gaza is a high-severity humanitarian protection profile. Public data can capture access restrictions, displacement and casualty reporting, but PASO should explicitly add victim testimony, medical worker testimony, family testimony and field accounts through protected review.", "risk_logic": "Curated datasets are necessary but insufficient in mass-harm environments where access is obstructed. The absence or delay of data may itself reflect the violence system.", "safe_actions": [ "Create or update the public-source packet with UN/HDX, OCHA, OHCHR, ACLED/HDX, NGO, court, audit and press anchors where available.", "Classify the claim state: established public fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis, or protected-review-only.", "Add testimony and survivor/witness accounts only through protected review; never publish identifying details in the public layer.", "Identify the demand origin, funder, sponsor, arms supplier, border-control sponsor, commodity buyer or institutional beneficiary.", "Request right of reply, public records, independent investigation, remedy and preservation of evidence." ], "source_links": [ { "label": "UN OCHA Humanitarian Data Exchange (HDX) — crisis data portal", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/" }, { "label": "OCHA Knowledge Base: HDX overview", "url": "https://knowledge.base.unocha.org/wiki/spaces/imtoolbox/pages/227967035/Humanitarian+Data+Exchange+HDX" }, { "label": "ACLED on HDX — political violence and protest event data", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/organization/acled" }, { "label": "HDX conflict/violence datasets", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/dataset/?vocab_Topics=conflict-violence" } ], "pattern_flags": [ "humanitarian access", "starvation risk", "aid workers", "completed starter", "public-source packet needed", "testimony-sensitive review" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-SUDAN-DARFUR-FAMINE-RISK-AID-OBSTRUCTION-AND-MASS-DISPLACEMENT-HUMANITARIAN-PROFILE", "title": "Sudan / Darfur — famine-risk, aid obstruction and mass-displacement humanitarian profile", "country": "Sudan", "region": "East Africa / Sahel", "lat": 15.5007, "lon": 32.5599, "status": "completed_starter_public_source_packet_needed", "overall_risk_score": 94, "evidence_strength": 78, "trust_index": 12, "demand_origins": [ "SAF/RSF war economy", "UAE/gold-market allegations", "regional sponsors" ], "presence_type": [ "civil war", "aid obstruction", "displacement camps", "gold-war economy" ], "abuse_types": [ "famine risk", "mass displacement", "sexual violence", "aid worker danger", "ethnic violence" ], "chronology": "2023-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Sudan's war creates a humanitarian catastrophe where displacement, famine risk, sexual violence allegations and aid obstruction intersect with gold and regional sponsorship allegations.", "risk_logic": "Humanitarian datasets must be read with testimonies from displaced communities, medical workers and aid networks because access constraints can hide the scale of harm.", "safe_actions": [ "Create or update the public-source packet with UN/HDX, OCHA, OHCHR, ACLED/HDX, NGO, court, audit and press anchors where available.", "Classify the claim state: established public fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis, or protected-review-only.", "Add testimony and survivor/witness accounts only through protected review; never publish identifying details in the public layer.", "Identify the demand origin, funder, sponsor, arms supplier, border-control sponsor, commodity buyer or institutional beneficiary.", "Request right of reply, public records, independent investigation, remedy and preservation of evidence." ], "source_links": [ { "label": "UN OCHA Humanitarian Data Exchange (HDX) — crisis data portal", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/" }, { "label": "OCHA Knowledge Base: HDX overview", "url": "https://knowledge.base.unocha.org/wiki/spaces/imtoolbox/pages/227967035/Humanitarian+Data+Exchange+HDX" }, { "label": "ACLED on HDX — political violence and protest event data", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/organization/acled" }, { "label": "HDX conflict/violence datasets", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/dataset/?vocab_Topics=conflict-violence" } ], "pattern_flags": [ "Sudan", "Darfur", "famine", "aid obstruction", "completed starter", "public-source packet needed", "testimony-sensitive review" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-TIGRAY-ETHIOPIA-AID-BLOCKADE-STARVATION-ALLEGATIONS-AND-SEXUAL-VIOLENCE-HUMANITARIAN-CASE", "title": "Tigray / Ethiopia — aid blockade, starvation allegations and sexual-violence humanitarian case", "country": "Ethiopia", "region": "Horn of Africa", "lat": 13.4967, "lon": 39.4753, "status": "completed_starter_public_source_packet_needed", "overall_risk_score": 92, "evidence_strength": 76, "trust_index": 14, "demand_origins": [ "Ethiopian/Eritrean/regional armed actors", "foreign arms/silence networks" ], "presence_type": [ "civil war", "aid blockade", "communications blackout" ], "abuse_types": [ "starvation allegation", "sexual violence", "mass displacement", "health-system collapse" ], "chronology": "2020-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Tigray is a humanitarian access and starvation-allegation profile with severe reporting limitations and survivor testimony relevance.", "risk_logic": "When communications and aid access are restricted, victim testimony and medical accounts become essential evidence classes alongside curated datasets.", "safe_actions": [ "Create or update the public-source packet with UN/HDX, OCHA, OHCHR, ACLED/HDX, NGO, court, audit and press anchors where available.", "Classify the claim state: established public fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis, or protected-review-only.", "Add testimony and survivor/witness accounts only through protected review; never publish identifying details in the public layer.", "Identify the demand origin, funder, sponsor, arms supplier, border-control sponsor, commodity buyer or institutional beneficiary.", "Request right of reply, public records, independent investigation, remedy and preservation of evidence." ], "source_links": [ { "label": "UN OCHA Humanitarian Data Exchange (HDX) — crisis data portal", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/" }, { "label": "OCHA Knowledge Base: HDX overview", "url": "https://knowledge.base.unocha.org/wiki/spaces/imtoolbox/pages/227967035/Humanitarian+Data+Exchange+HDX" }, { "label": "ACLED on HDX — political violence and protest event data", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/organization/acled" }, { "label": "HDX conflict/violence datasets", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/dataset/?vocab_Topics=conflict-violence" } ], "pattern_flags": [ "Tigray", "aid blockade", "sexual violence", "completed starter", "public-source packet needed", "testimony-sensitive review" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-YEMEN-BLOCKADE-FAMINE-CHOLERA-AND-ARMS-SUPPLIER-ACCOUNTABILITY-HUMANITARIAN-PROFILE", "title": "Yemen — blockade, famine, cholera and arms-supplier accountability humanitarian profile", "country": "Yemen / Saudi / UAE / Western suppliers", "region": "Middle East", "lat": 15.5527, "lon": 48.5164, "status": "completed_starter_public_source_packet_needed", "overall_risk_score": 94, "evidence_strength": 82, "trust_index": 10, "demand_origins": [ "Saudi Arabia", "UAE", "US/UK/EU arms suppliers", "blockade enforcement" ], "presence_type": [ "air war", "blockade", "port control", "arms supply" ], "abuse_types": [ "famine risk", "cholera", "civilian bombing", "aid obstruction", "child malnutrition" ], "chronology": "2015-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Yemen links blockade, air war, disease, hunger and arms-supplier accountability. The humanitarian pattern must include demand origin and supplier origin.", "risk_logic": "Aid statistics must be joined to testimony and local health-system accounts because famine is often produced through policy, blockade and market disruption.", "safe_actions": [ "Create or update the public-source packet with UN/HDX, OCHA, OHCHR, ACLED/HDX, NGO, court, audit and press anchors where available.", "Classify the claim state: established public fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis, or protected-review-only.", "Add testimony and survivor/witness accounts only through protected review; never publish identifying details in the public layer.", "Identify the demand origin, funder, sponsor, arms supplier, border-control sponsor, commodity buyer or institutional beneficiary.", "Request right of reply, public records, independent investigation, remedy and preservation of evidence." ], "source_links": [ { "label": "UN OCHA Humanitarian Data Exchange (HDX) — crisis data portal", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/" }, { "label": "OCHA Knowledge Base: HDX overview", "url": "https://knowledge.base.unocha.org/wiki/spaces/imtoolbox/pages/227967035/Humanitarian+Data+Exchange+HDX" }, { "label": "ACLED on HDX — political violence and protest event data", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/organization/acled" }, { "label": "HDX conflict/violence datasets", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/dataset/?vocab_Topics=conflict-violence" } ], "pattern_flags": [ "Yemen", "blockade", "arms suppliers", "cholera", "completed starter", "public-source packet needed", "testimony-sensitive review" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-SYRIA-HOSPITAL-ATTACKS-AID-CONVOY-STRIKES-AND-SIEGE-HUMANITARIAN-PROFILE", "title": "Syria — hospital attacks, aid convoy strikes and siege-humanitarian profile", "country": "Syria / foreign sponsors", "region": "Middle East", "lat": 34.8021, "lon": 38.9968, "status": "completed_starter_public_source_packet_needed", "overall_risk_score": 90, "evidence_strength": 78, "trust_index": 16, "demand_origins": [ "Syrian state/armed actors", "Russia/Iran/Turkey/US-linked zones", "arms suppliers" ], "presence_type": [ "siege warfare", "hospital attacks", "aid convoy risk", "cross-border aid politics" ], "abuse_types": [ "hospital bombing", "aid obstruction", "displacement", "detention disappearance" ], "chronology": "2011-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Syria is a benchmark humanitarian protection case: health facilities, aid convoys, siege policy and forced displacement require pattern-level mapping.", "risk_logic": "Attacks on humanitarian infrastructure are not collateral details; they are system indicators for civilian-protection collapse.", "safe_actions": [ "Create or update the public-source packet with UN/HDX, OCHA, OHCHR, ACLED/HDX, NGO, court, audit and press anchors where available.", "Classify the claim state: established public fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis, or protected-review-only.", "Add testimony and survivor/witness accounts only through protected review; never publish identifying details in the public layer.", "Identify the demand origin, funder, sponsor, arms supplier, border-control sponsor, commodity buyer or institutional beneficiary.", "Request right of reply, public records, independent investigation, remedy and preservation of evidence." ], "source_links": [ { "label": "UN OCHA Humanitarian Data Exchange (HDX) — crisis data portal", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/" }, { "label": "OCHA Knowledge Base: HDX overview", "url": "https://knowledge.base.unocha.org/wiki/spaces/imtoolbox/pages/227967035/Humanitarian+Data+Exchange+HDX" }, { "label": "ACLED on HDX — political violence and protest event data", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/organization/acled" }, { "label": "HDX conflict/violence datasets", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/dataset/?vocab_Topics=conflict-violence" } ], "pattern_flags": [ "Syria", "hospital attacks", "aid convoys", "completed starter", "public-source packet needed", "testimony-sensitive review" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-AFGHANISTAN-POST-2021-ASSET-FREEZE-SANCTIONS-HUNGER-AND-AID-SYSTEM-COLLAPSE-PROFILE", "title": "Afghanistan post-2021 — asset freeze, sanctions, hunger and aid-system collapse profile", "country": "Afghanistan / United States / donors", "region": "Central Asia / Global", "lat": 33.9391, "lon": 67.71, "status": "completed_starter_public_source_packet_needed", "overall_risk_score": 86, "evidence_strength": 70, "trust_index": 20, "demand_origins": [ "United States", "donor states", "banking restrictions" ], "presence_type": [ "asset freeze", "sanctions", "aid dependency", "banking restrictions" ], "abuse_types": [ "hunger risk", "health-system collapse", "cash liquidity crisis", "aid obstruction by finance" ], "chronology": "2021-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Afghanistan shows that humanitarian harm can be produced through finance, reserves, sanctions and banking systems, not only bombs.", "risk_logic": "When money, salaries, medical procurement and banking channels are blocked, humanitarian harm becomes financial infrastructure harm.", "safe_actions": [ "Create or update the public-source packet with UN/HDX, OCHA, OHCHR, ACLED/HDX, NGO, court, audit and press anchors where available.", "Classify the claim state: established public fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis, or protected-review-only.", "Add testimony and survivor/witness accounts only through protected review; never publish identifying details in the public layer.", "Identify the demand origin, funder, sponsor, arms supplier, border-control sponsor, commodity buyer or institutional beneficiary.", "Request right of reply, public records, independent investigation, remedy and preservation of evidence." ], "source_links": [ { "label": "UN OCHA Humanitarian Data Exchange (HDX) — crisis data portal", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/" }, { "label": "OCHA Knowledge Base: HDX overview", "url": "https://knowledge.base.unocha.org/wiki/spaces/imtoolbox/pages/227967035/Humanitarian+Data+Exchange+HDX" }, { "label": "ACLED on HDX — political violence and protest event data", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/organization/acled" }, { "label": "HDX conflict/violence datasets", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/dataset/?vocab_Topics=conflict-violence" } ], "pattern_flags": [ "asset freeze", "sanctions", "humanitarian finance", "completed starter", "public-source packet needed", "testimony-sensitive review" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-SOMALIA-AID-RESTRICTIONS-FAMINE-CYCLES-AND-AL-SHABAAB-STATE-INTERNATIONAL-ACCESS-RISK-PROFILE", "title": "Somalia — aid restrictions, famine cycles and Al-Shabaab/state/international access-risk profile", "country": "Somalia", "region": "Horn of Africa", "lat": 5.1521, "lon": 46.1996, "status": "completed_starter_public_source_packet_needed", "overall_risk_score": 86, "evidence_strength": 70, "trust_index": 20, "demand_origins": [ "Al-Shabaab", "state/international counterterrorism policy", "donor restrictions" ], "presence_type": [ "aid access", "counterterrorism restrictions", "drought/famine response" ], "abuse_types": [ "famine risk", "aid worker attack", "access denial", "displacement" ], "chronology": "1990-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Somalia's humanitarian profile requires linking drought, conflict, aid access, counterterrorism restrictions and field testimony.", "risk_logic": "Famine risk is political when access, security, sanctions and aid restrictions shape who can eat.", "safe_actions": [ "Create or update the public-source packet with UN/HDX, OCHA, OHCHR, ACLED/HDX, NGO, court, audit and press anchors where available.", "Classify the claim state: established public fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis, or protected-review-only.", "Add testimony and survivor/witness accounts only through protected review; never publish identifying details in the public layer.", "Identify the demand origin, funder, sponsor, arms supplier, border-control sponsor, commodity buyer or institutional beneficiary.", "Request right of reply, public records, independent investigation, remedy and preservation of evidence." ], "source_links": [ { "label": "UN OCHA Humanitarian Data Exchange (HDX) — crisis data portal", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/" }, { "label": "OCHA Knowledge Base: HDX overview", "url": "https://knowledge.base.unocha.org/wiki/spaces/imtoolbox/pages/227967035/Humanitarian+Data+Exchange+HDX" }, { "label": "ACLED on HDX — political violence and protest event data", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/organization/acled" }, { "label": "HDX conflict/violence datasets", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/dataset/?vocab_Topics=conflict-violence" } ], "pattern_flags": [ "Somalia", "famine", "aid restrictions", "completed starter", "public-source packet needed", "testimony-sensitive review" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-SOUTH-SUDAN-AID-WORKER-KILLINGS-ETHNIC-VIOLENCE-AND-HUMANITARIAN-ACCESS-COLLAPSE-PROFILE", "title": "South Sudan — aid-worker killings, ethnic violence and humanitarian-access collapse profile", "country": "South Sudan", "region": "East Africa", "lat": 6.877, "lon": 31.307, "status": "completed_starter_public_source_packet_needed", "overall_risk_score": 88, "evidence_strength": 70, "trust_index": 18, "demand_origins": [ "armed factions", "elite oil/power networks", "regional arms flows" ], "presence_type": [ "civil war", "aid access", "oil-war economy" ], "abuse_types": [ "aid worker killings", "mass displacement", "sexual violence", "famine risk" ], "chronology": "2013-present", "plain_diagnosis": "South Sudan is a high-risk humanitarian access profile where aid workers, civilians and displaced communities face repeated harm.", "risk_logic": "Aid-worker casualty data must be combined with local testimony and camp-level accounts to avoid undercounting.", "safe_actions": [ "Create or update the public-source packet with UN/HDX, OCHA, OHCHR, ACLED/HDX, NGO, court, audit and press anchors where available.", "Classify the claim state: established public fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis, or protected-review-only.", "Add testimony and survivor/witness accounts only through protected review; never publish identifying details in the public layer.", "Identify the demand origin, funder, sponsor, arms supplier, border-control sponsor, commodity buyer or institutional beneficiary.", "Request right of reply, public records, independent investigation, remedy and preservation of evidence." ], "source_links": [ { "label": "UN OCHA Humanitarian Data Exchange (HDX) — crisis data portal", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/" }, { "label": "OCHA Knowledge Base: HDX overview", "url": "https://knowledge.base.unocha.org/wiki/spaces/imtoolbox/pages/227967035/Humanitarian+Data+Exchange+HDX" }, { "label": "ACLED on HDX — political violence and protest event data", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/organization/acled" }, { "label": "HDX conflict/violence datasets", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/dataset/?vocab_Topics=conflict-violence" } ], "pattern_flags": [ "South Sudan", "aid workers", "displacement", "completed starter", "public-source packet needed", "testimony-sensitive review" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-DRC-KIVU-IDP-CAMP-ATTACKS-AID-ACCESS-AND-MINERAL-WAR-HUMANITARIAN-PROFILE", "title": "DRC / Kivu — IDP camp attacks, aid access and mineral-war humanitarian profile", "country": "DRC", "region": "Central Africa", "lat": -1.6585, "lon": 29.2205, "status": "completed_starter_public_source_packet_needed", "overall_risk_score": 92, "evidence_strength": 76, "trust_index": 14, "demand_origins": [ "armed groups", "regional sponsors", "mineral demand", "state failure" ], "presence_type": [ "IDP camps", "armed conflict", "mineral corridors" ], "abuse_types": [ "camp attacks", "sexual violence", "child recruitment", "aid obstruction", "displacement" ], "chronology": "1994-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Eastern DRC is a humanitarian, mineral-war and regional-sponsorship profile. IDP camps, routes and testimony must be protected while public patterns are mapped.", "risk_logic": "Curated incidents can miss the structure: mineral demand, armed networks, regional logistics, displacement camps and sexual violence risk are one connected field.", "safe_actions": [ "Create or update the public-source packet with UN/HDX, OCHA, OHCHR, ACLED/HDX, NGO, court, audit and press anchors where available.", "Classify the claim state: established public fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis, or protected-review-only.", "Add testimony and survivor/witness accounts only through protected review; never publish identifying details in the public layer.", "Identify the demand origin, funder, sponsor, arms supplier, border-control sponsor, commodity buyer or institutional beneficiary.", "Request right of reply, public records, independent investigation, remedy and preservation of evidence." ], "source_links": [ { "label": "UN OCHA Humanitarian Data Exchange (HDX) — crisis data portal", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/" }, { "label": "OCHA Knowledge Base: HDX overview", "url": "https://knowledge.base.unocha.org/wiki/spaces/imtoolbox/pages/227967035/Humanitarian+Data+Exchange+HDX" }, { "label": "ACLED on HDX — political violence and protest event data", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/organization/acled" }, { "label": "HDX conflict/violence datasets", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/dataset/?vocab_Topics=conflict-violence" } ], "pattern_flags": [ "DRC", "IDP camps", "mineral war", "completed starter", "public-source packet needed", "testimony-sensitive review" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-HAITI-HUMANITARIAN-ACCESS-UNDER-GANG-CONTROL-AND-FOREIGN-INTERVENTION-ACCOUNTABILITY-PROFILE", "title": "Haiti — humanitarian access under gang control and foreign-intervention accountability profile", "country": "Haiti", "region": "Caribbean", "lat": 18.9712, "lon": -72.2852, "status": "completed_starter_public_source_packet_needed", "overall_risk_score": 88, "evidence_strength": 70, "trust_index": 18, "demand_origins": [ "gang economies", "foreign intervention history", "aid contractors", "arms flows" ], "presence_type": [ "gang territorial control", "aid access", "disaster-aid systems" ], "abuse_types": [ "kidnapping", "sexual violence", "medical-access collapse", "aid obstruction" ], "chronology": "2010-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Haiti's humanitarian case links gang control, kidnapping, medical access, disaster-aid dependency and foreign intervention history.", "risk_logic": "Public data should be supplemented by victim, clinic, community and diaspora testimony because formal systems are weak and dangerous.", "safe_actions": [ "Create or update the public-source packet with UN/HDX, OCHA, OHCHR, ACLED/HDX, NGO, court, audit and press anchors where available.", "Classify the claim state: established public fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis, or protected-review-only.", "Add testimony and survivor/witness accounts only through protected review; never publish identifying details in the public layer.", "Identify the demand origin, funder, sponsor, arms supplier, border-control sponsor, commodity buyer or institutional beneficiary.", "Request right of reply, public records, independent investigation, remedy and preservation of evidence." ], "source_links": [ { "label": "UN OCHA Humanitarian Data Exchange (HDX) — crisis data portal", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/" }, { "label": "OCHA Knowledge Base: HDX overview", "url": "https://knowledge.base.unocha.org/wiki/spaces/imtoolbox/pages/227967035/Humanitarian+Data+Exchange+HDX" }, { "label": "ACLED on HDX — political violence and protest event data", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/organization/acled" }, { "label": "HDX conflict/violence datasets", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/dataset/?vocab_Topics=conflict-violence" } ], "pattern_flags": [ "Haiti", "gang control", "aid access", "completed starter", "public-source packet needed", "testimony-sensitive review" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-MYANMAR-ROHINGYA-CAMP-CONFINEMENT-TRAFFICKING-AND-HUMANITARIAN-PROTECTION-PROFILE", "title": "Myanmar / Rohingya — camp confinement, trafficking and humanitarian protection profile", "country": "Myanmar / Bangladesh", "region": "Asia", "lat": 21.1769, "lon": 92.3222, "status": "completed_starter_public_source_packet_needed", "overall_risk_score": 90, "evidence_strength": 78, "trust_index": 14, "demand_origins": [ "Myanmar military", "regional border regimes", "trafficking networks" ], "presence_type": [ "refugee camps", "military persecution", "border control" ], "abuse_types": [ "ethnic cleansing", "trafficking risk", "camp fires", "statelessness", "aid dependency" ], "chronology": "2017-present", "plain_diagnosis": "The Rohingya profile combines ethnic cleansing, statelessness, refugee-camp dependency and trafficking risk.", "risk_logic": "A humanitarian dataset cannot fully capture statelessness, fear and trafficking pressure; testimony and protection reports are essential.", "safe_actions": [ "Create or update the public-source packet with UN/HDX, OCHA, OHCHR, ACLED/HDX, NGO, court, audit and press anchors where available.", "Classify the claim state: established public fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis, or protected-review-only.", "Add testimony and survivor/witness accounts only through protected review; never publish identifying details in the public layer.", "Identify the demand origin, funder, sponsor, arms supplier, border-control sponsor, commodity buyer or institutional beneficiary.", "Request right of reply, public records, independent investigation, remedy and preservation of evidence." ], "source_links": [ { "label": "UN OCHA Humanitarian Data Exchange (HDX) — crisis data portal", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/" }, { "label": "OCHA Knowledge Base: HDX overview", "url": "https://knowledge.base.unocha.org/wiki/spaces/imtoolbox/pages/227967035/Humanitarian+Data+Exchange+HDX" }, { "label": "ACLED on HDX — political violence and protest event data", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/organization/acled" }, { "label": "HDX conflict/violence datasets", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/dataset/?vocab_Topics=conflict-violence" } ], "pattern_flags": [ "Rohingya", "statelessness", "trafficking", "completed starter", "public-source packet needed", "testimony-sensitive review" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-MEDITERRANEAN-CENTRAL-ROUTE-DEATHS-AT-SEA-RESCUE-CRIMINALIZATION-AND-BORDER-DETERRENCE-PROFILE", "title": "Mediterranean Central Route — deaths at sea, rescue criminalization and border deterrence profile", "country": "Mediterranean / EU / Libya", "region": "Europe / Africa", "lat": 35.0, "lon": 18.0, "status": "completed_starter_public_source_packet_needed", "overall_risk_score": 88, "evidence_strength": 78, "trust_index": 16, "demand_origins": [ "European Union", "Italy", "Frontex/border agencies", "Libyan coastguard support" ], "presence_type": [ "maritime border control", "rescue obstruction", "pushback chains" ], "abuse_types": [ "migrant deaths", "non-refoulement risk", "criminalization of solidarity" ], "chronology": "2014-present", "plain_diagnosis": "The Central Mediterranean humanitarian case exposes how deterrence policy produces deaths, pushbacks and rescue criminalization.", "risk_logic": "Deaths at sea are not natural if policy choices restrict safe passage and rescue.", "safe_actions": [ "Create or update the public-source packet with UN/HDX, OCHA, OHCHR, ACLED/HDX, NGO, court, audit and press anchors where available.", "Classify the claim state: established public fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis, or protected-review-only.", "Add testimony and survivor/witness accounts only through protected review; never publish identifying details in the public layer.", "Identify the demand origin, funder, sponsor, arms supplier, border-control sponsor, commodity buyer or institutional beneficiary.", "Request right of reply, public records, independent investigation, remedy and preservation of evidence." ], "source_links": [ { "label": "UN OCHA Humanitarian Data Exchange (HDX) — crisis data portal", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/" }, { "label": "OCHA Knowledge Base: HDX overview", "url": "https://knowledge.base.unocha.org/wiki/spaces/imtoolbox/pages/227967035/Humanitarian+Data+Exchange+HDX" }, { "label": "ACLED on HDX — political violence and protest event data", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/organization/acled" }, { "label": "HDX conflict/violence datasets", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/dataset/?vocab_Topics=conflict-violence" } ], "pattern_flags": [ "Mediterranean", "SAR criminalization", "border deaths", "completed starter", "public-source packet needed", "testimony-sensitive review" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-CENTRAL-SAHEL-SIEGE-TOWNS-SCHOOL-CLOSURES-AND-HUMANITARIAN-ACCESS-PROFILE", "title": "Central Sahel — siege towns, school closures and humanitarian access profile", "country": "Mali / Burkina Faso / Niger", "region": "Sahel", "lat": 14.5, "lon": -1.0, "status": "completed_starter_public_source_packet_needed", "overall_risk_score": 90, "evidence_strength": 70, "trust_index": 18, "demand_origins": [ "armed groups", "state forces", "foreign partners", "sanctions/diplomatic pressure" ], "presence_type": [ "siege tactics", "counterterrorism", "school closures", "aid access" ], "abuse_types": [ "food blockade", "education collapse", "civilian massacre risk", "displacement" ], "chronology": "2012-present", "plain_diagnosis": "The Central Sahel profile tracks siege towns, humanitarian access, school closures and civilian harm under both armed-group and state/foreign-security pressure.", "risk_logic": "Humanitarian harm must be mapped without allowing foreign narratives to erase terrorism-support allegations or state abuse allegations.", "safe_actions": [ "Create or update the public-source packet with UN/HDX, OCHA, OHCHR, ACLED/HDX, NGO, court, audit and press anchors where available.", "Classify the claim state: established public fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis, or protected-review-only.", "Add testimony and survivor/witness accounts only through protected review; never publish identifying details in the public layer.", "Identify the demand origin, funder, sponsor, arms supplier, border-control sponsor, commodity buyer or institutional beneficiary.", "Request right of reply, public records, independent investigation, remedy and preservation of evidence." ], "source_links": [ { "label": "UN OCHA Humanitarian Data Exchange (HDX) — crisis data portal", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/" }, { "label": "OCHA Knowledge Base: HDX overview", "url": "https://knowledge.base.unocha.org/wiki/spaces/imtoolbox/pages/227967035/Humanitarian+Data+Exchange+HDX" }, { "label": "ACLED on HDX — political violence and protest event data", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/organization/acled" }, { "label": "HDX conflict/violence datasets", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/dataset/?vocab_Topics=conflict-violence" } ], "pattern_flags": [ "Sahel", "siege towns", "school closures", "completed starter", "public-source packet needed", "testimony-sensitive review" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-NIGERIA-NORTH-EAST-AID-WORKER-KIDNAPPING-CAMP-DEPENDENCY-AND-COUNTERTERRORISM-PROFILE", "title": "Nigeria North East — aid-worker kidnapping, camp dependency and counterterrorism profile", "country": "Nigeria", "region": "West Africa", "lat": 11.8846, "lon": 13.151, "status": "completed_starter_public_source_packet_needed", "overall_risk_score": 86, "evidence_strength": 70, "trust_index": 20, "demand_origins": [ "Boko Haram/ISWAP", "state counterterrorism", "donor systems" ], "presence_type": [ "camp humanitarianism", "counterterrorism", "aid operations" ], "abuse_types": [ "aid worker kidnapping", "camp abuse risk", "food insecurity", "displacement" ], "chronology": "2009-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Nigeria's North East profile maps insurgent violence, counterterrorism limits, IDP camp dependency and aid-worker risk.", "risk_logic": "Camp survival data must be paired with camp testimony, gendered violence reporting and protection reviews.", "safe_actions": [ "Create or update the public-source packet with UN/HDX, OCHA, OHCHR, ACLED/HDX, NGO, court, audit and press anchors where available.", "Classify the claim state: established public fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis, or protected-review-only.", "Add testimony and survivor/witness accounts only through protected review; never publish identifying details in the public layer.", "Identify the demand origin, funder, sponsor, arms supplier, border-control sponsor, commodity buyer or institutional beneficiary.", "Request right of reply, public records, independent investigation, remedy and preservation of evidence." ], "source_links": [ { "label": "UN OCHA Humanitarian Data Exchange (HDX) — crisis data portal", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/" }, { "label": "OCHA Knowledge Base: HDX overview", "url": "https://knowledge.base.unocha.org/wiki/spaces/imtoolbox/pages/227967035/Humanitarian+Data+Exchange+HDX" }, { "label": "ACLED on HDX — political violence and protest event data", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/organization/acled" }, { "label": "HDX conflict/violence datasets", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/dataset/?vocab_Topics=conflict-violence" } ], "pattern_flags": [ "Nigeria NE", "aid worker kidnapping", "IDP camps", "completed starter", "public-source packet needed", "testimony-sensitive review" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-BURKINA-FASO-MASS-DISPLACEMENT-BLOCKED-TOWNS-AND-CIVIL-DEFENCE-ABUSE-RISK-PROFILE", "title": "Burkina Faso — mass displacement, blocked towns and civil-defence abuse-risk profile", "country": "Burkina Faso", "region": "Sahel", "lat": 12.2383, "lon": -1.5616, "status": "completed_starter_public_source_packet_needed", "overall_risk_score": 86, "evidence_strength": 64, "trust_index": 20, "demand_origins": [ "armed groups", "state forces", "civilian auxiliaries", "foreign partners" ], "presence_type": [ "civil defence", "siege areas", "counterterrorism", "paramilitary / PMC / auxiliary force" ], "abuse_types": [ "mass displacement", "ethnic targeting risk", "food access denial", "reprisal violence" ], "chronology": "2015-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Burkina Faso's humanitarian profile includes mass displacement, blocked communities and risks tied to both armed groups and auxiliary/security responses.", "risk_logic": "Testimony matters because village-level reprisal and blockade patterns can be underreported.", "safe_actions": [ "Create or update the public-source packet with UN/HDX, OCHA, OHCHR, ACLED/HDX, NGO, court, audit and press anchors where available.", "Classify the claim state: established public fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis, or protected-review-only.", "Add testimony and survivor/witness accounts only through protected review; never publish identifying details in the public layer.", "Identify the demand origin, funder, sponsor, arms supplier, border-control sponsor, commodity buyer or institutional beneficiary.", "Request right of reply, public records, independent investigation, remedy and preservation of evidence." ], "source_links": [ { "label": "UN OCHA Humanitarian Data Exchange (HDX) — crisis data portal", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/" }, { "label": "OCHA Knowledge Base: HDX overview", "url": "https://knowledge.base.unocha.org/wiki/spaces/imtoolbox/pages/227967035/Humanitarian+Data+Exchange+HDX" }, { "label": "ACLED on HDX — political violence and protest event data", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/organization/acled" }, { "label": "HDX conflict/violence datasets", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/dataset/?vocab_Topics=conflict-violence" } ], "pattern_flags": [ "Burkina Faso", "blocked towns", "civil defence", "completed starter", "public-source packet needed", "testimony-sensitive review", "source-origin discipline required", "victim/community testimony threshold" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-MALI-HUMANITARIAN-ACCESS-AIRSTRIKE-ALLEGATIONS-AND-TERRORISM-SUPPORT-NARRATIVE-CONFLICT", "title": "Mali — humanitarian access, airstrike allegations and terrorism-support narrative conflict", "country": "Mali", "region": "Sahel", "lat": 17.5707, "lon": -3.9962, "status": "completed_starter_public_source_packet_needed", "overall_risk_score": 84, "evidence_strength": 62, "trust_index": 22, "demand_origins": [ "armed groups", "state forces", "foreign actors", "media ecosystems" ], "presence_type": [ "counterterrorism", "aid access", "air operations", "information warfare" ], "abuse_types": [ "civilian harm allegation", "aid access risk", "narrative laundering", "displacement" ], "chronology": "2012-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Mali requires balanced public-protection mapping: armed-group abuse, state/partner allegations, and external narrative pressure must be separated but visible.", "risk_logic": "Humanitarian data must not be used to launder armed groups or to hide state abuse; classification discipline is central.", "safe_actions": [ "Create or update the public-source packet with UN/HDX, OCHA, OHCHR, ACLED/HDX, NGO, court, audit and press anchors where available.", "Classify the claim state: established public fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis, or protected-review-only.", "Add testimony and survivor/witness accounts only through protected review; never publish identifying details in the public layer.", "Identify the demand origin, funder, sponsor, arms supplier, border-control sponsor, commodity buyer or institutional beneficiary.", "Request right of reply, public records, independent investigation, remedy and preservation of evidence." ], "source_links": [ { "label": "UN OCHA Humanitarian Data Exchange (HDX) — crisis data portal", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/" }, { "label": "OCHA Knowledge Base: HDX overview", "url": "https://knowledge.base.unocha.org/wiki/spaces/imtoolbox/pages/227967035/Humanitarian+Data+Exchange+HDX" }, { "label": "ACLED on HDX — political violence and protest event data", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/organization/acled" }, { "label": "HDX conflict/violence datasets", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/dataset/?vocab_Topics=conflict-violence" } ], "pattern_flags": [ "Mali", "counterterrorism", "narrative conflict", "completed starter", "public-source packet needed", "testimony-sensitive review" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-CAR-HUMANITARIAN-WORKER-ATTACKS-MERCENARY-RISK-AND-RESOURCE-SECURITY-PROFILE", "title": "CAR — humanitarian worker attacks, mercenary-risk and resource-security profile", "country": "Central African Republic", "region": "Central Africa", "lat": 6.6111, "lon": 20.9394, "status": "completed_starter_public_source_packet_needed", "overall_risk_score": 84, "evidence_strength": 62, "trust_index": 22, "demand_origins": [ "armed groups", "PMC/resource-security actors", "state forces" ], "presence_type": [ "humanitarian access", "resource-security operations", "foreign contractors", "paramilitary / PMC / auxiliary force" ], "abuse_types": [ "aid worker attack", "civilian harm", "displacement", "resource capture" ], "chronology": "2013-present", "plain_diagnosis": "CAR combines humanitarian-access danger, contractor/foreign-security risk and resource war economics.", "risk_logic": "Where resource-security and humanitarian crisis overlap, aid access can become hostage to armed economic networks.", "safe_actions": [ "Create or update the public-source packet with UN/HDX, OCHA, OHCHR, ACLED/HDX, NGO, court, audit and press anchors where available.", "Classify the claim state: established public fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis, or protected-review-only.", "Add testimony and survivor/witness accounts only through protected review; never publish identifying details in the public layer.", "Identify the demand origin, funder, sponsor, arms supplier, border-control sponsor, commodity buyer or institutional beneficiary.", "Request right of reply, public records, independent investigation, remedy and preservation of evidence." ], "source_links": [ { "label": "UN OCHA Humanitarian Data Exchange (HDX) — crisis data portal", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/" }, { "label": "OCHA Knowledge Base: HDX overview", "url": "https://knowledge.base.unocha.org/wiki/spaces/imtoolbox/pages/227967035/Humanitarian+Data+Exchange+HDX" }, { "label": "ACLED on HDX — political violence and protest event data", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/organization/acled" }, { "label": "HDX conflict/violence datasets", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/dataset/?vocab_Topics=conflict-violence" } ], "pattern_flags": [ "CAR", "aid worker attacks", "PMC risk", "completed starter", "public-source packet needed", "testimony-sensitive review", "source-origin discipline required", "victim/community testimony threshold" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-EBOLA-RESPONSE-IN-DRC-ATTACKS-ON-HEALTH-WORKERS-AND-BIOSECURITY-TRUST-PROFILE", "title": "Ebola response in DRC — attacks on health workers and biosecurity trust profile", "country": "DRC", "region": "Central Africa", "lat": 0.5, "lon": 29.5, "status": "completed_starter_public_source_packet_needed", "overall_risk_score": 82, "evidence_strength": 68, "trust_index": 24, "demand_origins": [ "armed groups", "health-system distrust", "global health institutions" ], "presence_type": [ "epidemic response", "health centers", "community mistrust" ], "abuse_types": [ "health worker attacks", "biosecurity trust failure", "rumor violence", "data sovereignty concern" ], "chronology": "2018-present", "plain_diagnosis": "The DRC Ebola response shows that epidemic control depends on trust, protection of health workers, data sovereignty and community consent.", "risk_logic": "A health response can fail when communities see extraction, secrecy or foreign control; testimony and local trust indicators must accompany health data.", "safe_actions": [ "Create or update the public-source packet with UN/HDX, OCHA, OHCHR, ACLED/HDX, NGO, court, audit and press anchors where available.", "Classify the claim state: established public fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis, or protected-review-only.", "Add testimony and survivor/witness accounts only through protected review; never publish identifying details in the public layer.", "Identify the demand origin, funder, sponsor, arms supplier, border-control sponsor, commodity buyer or institutional beneficiary.", "Request right of reply, public records, independent investigation, remedy and preservation of evidence." ], "source_links": [ { "label": "UN OCHA Humanitarian Data Exchange (HDX) — crisis data portal", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/" }, { "label": "OCHA Knowledge Base: HDX overview", "url": "https://knowledge.base.unocha.org/wiki/spaces/imtoolbox/pages/227967035/Humanitarian+Data+Exchange+HDX" }, { "label": "ACLED on HDX — political violence and protest event data", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/organization/acled" }, { "label": "HDX conflict/violence datasets", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/dataset/?vocab_Topics=conflict-violence" } ], "pattern_flags": [ "Ebola", "health workers", "biosecurity trust", "completed starter", "public-source packet needed", "testimony-sensitive review" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-COVID-19-GLOBAL-VACCINE-ACCESS-HUMANITARIAN-INEQUALITY-AND-IP-CAPTURE-PROFILE", "title": "COVID-19 global vaccine access — humanitarian inequality and IP capture profile", "country": "Global South", "region": "Global", "lat": 0.0, "lon": 20.0, "status": "completed_starter_public_source_packet_needed", "overall_risk_score": 82, "evidence_strength": 70, "trust_index": 24, "demand_origins": [ "wealthy states", "pharma companies", "IP regimes" ], "presence_type": [ "vaccine procurement", "patents", "global health governance" ], "abuse_types": [ "avoidable mortality", "vaccine inequality", "public-health dependency" ], "chronology": "2020-present", "plain_diagnosis": "COVID-19 vaccine access is a humanitarian inequality case tied to patents, procurement power and global health governance.", "risk_logic": "Humanitarian datasets should be complemented by community mortality, access and health-system testimony, especially where formal reporting is weak.", "safe_actions": [ "Create or update the public-source packet with UN/HDX, OCHA, OHCHR, ACLED/HDX, NGO, court, audit and press anchors where available.", "Classify the claim state: established public fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis, or protected-review-only.", "Add testimony and survivor/witness accounts only through protected review; never publish identifying details in the public layer.", "Identify the demand origin, funder, sponsor, arms supplier, border-control sponsor, commodity buyer or institutional beneficiary.", "Request right of reply, public records, independent investigation, remedy and preservation of evidence." ], "source_links": [ { "label": "UN OCHA Humanitarian Data Exchange (HDX) — crisis data portal", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/" }, { "label": "OCHA Knowledge Base: HDX overview", "url": "https://knowledge.base.unocha.org/wiki/spaces/imtoolbox/pages/227967035/Humanitarian+Data+Exchange+HDX" }, { "label": "ACLED on HDX — political violence and protest event data", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/organization/acled" }, { "label": "HDX conflict/violence datasets", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/dataset/?vocab_Topics=conflict-violence" } ], "pattern_flags": [ "vaccine inequality", "IP capture", "global health", "completed starter", "public-source packet needed", "testimony-sensitive review" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-ETHIOPIA-SUDAN-SOMALIA-DROUGHT-CLIMATE-DEBT-AND-CONFLICT-AMPLIFIED-HUMANITARIAN-PROFILE", "title": "Ethiopia / Sudan / Somalia drought — climate, debt and conflict-amplified humanitarian profile", "country": "Horn of Africa", "region": "East Africa", "lat": 5.0, "lon": 40.0, "status": "completed_starter_public_source_packet_needed", "overall_risk_score": 84, "evidence_strength": 68, "trust_index": 24, "demand_origins": [ "climate debt emitters", "donor systems", "conflict actors" ], "presence_type": [ "drought", "aid financing", "conflict access" ], "abuse_types": [ "food insecurity", "livestock collapse", "displacement", "debt injustice" ], "chronology": "2020-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Horn of Africa drought is not only a climate event. It is amplified by conflict, debt, weak infrastructure, donor dependence and historical emissions inequality.", "risk_logic": "Climate harm should be mapped with responsibility: who emitted, who owes, who controls aid, and who is left hungry.", "safe_actions": [ "Create or update the public-source packet with UN/HDX, OCHA, OHCHR, ACLED/HDX, NGO, court, audit and press anchors where available.", "Classify the claim state: established public fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis, or protected-review-only.", "Add testimony and survivor/witness accounts only through protected review; never publish identifying details in the public layer.", "Identify the demand origin, funder, sponsor, arms supplier, border-control sponsor, commodity buyer or institutional beneficiary.", "Request right of reply, public records, independent investigation, remedy and preservation of evidence." ], "source_links": [ { "label": "UN OCHA Humanitarian Data Exchange (HDX) — crisis data portal", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/" }, { "label": "OCHA Knowledge Base: HDX overview", "url": "https://knowledge.base.unocha.org/wiki/spaces/imtoolbox/pages/227967035/Humanitarian+Data+Exchange+HDX" }, { "label": "ACLED on HDX — political violence and protest event data", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/organization/acled" }, { "label": "HDX conflict/violence datasets", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/dataset/?vocab_Topics=conflict-violence" } ], "pattern_flags": [ "climate debt", "drought", "food insecurity", "completed starter", "public-source packet needed", "testimony-sensitive review" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-PAKISTAN-FLOODS-CLIMATE-LOSS-DEBT-AND-HUMANITARIAN-FINANCE-PROFILE", "title": "Pakistan floods — climate-loss, debt and humanitarian finance profile", "country": "Pakistan", "region": "Asia", "lat": 30.3753, "lon": 69.3451, "status": "completed_starter_public_source_packet_needed", "overall_risk_score": 78, "evidence_strength": 66, "trust_index": 30, "demand_origins": [ "historical emitters", "creditors", "donor finance systems" ], "presence_type": [ "flood disaster", "climate finance", "debt repayment" ], "abuse_types": [ "mass displacement", "food insecurity", "debt pressure", "public-health risk" ], "chronology": "2022-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Pakistan's floods show how climate disaster, debt and humanitarian finance can trap affected populations.", "risk_logic": "Loss-and-damage justice must be treated as humanitarian protection, not charity.", "safe_actions": [ "Create or update the public-source packet with UN/HDX, OCHA, OHCHR, ACLED/HDX, NGO, court, audit and press anchors where available.", "Classify the claim state: established public fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis, or protected-review-only.", "Add testimony and survivor/witness accounts only through protected review; never publish identifying details in the public layer.", "Identify the demand origin, funder, sponsor, arms supplier, border-control sponsor, commodity buyer or institutional beneficiary.", "Request right of reply, public records, independent investigation, remedy and preservation of evidence." ], "source_links": [ { "label": "UN OCHA Humanitarian Data Exchange (HDX) — crisis data portal", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/" }, { "label": "OCHA Knowledge Base: HDX overview", "url": "https://knowledge.base.unocha.org/wiki/spaces/imtoolbox/pages/227967035/Humanitarian+Data+Exchange+HDX" }, { "label": "ACLED on HDX — political violence and protest event data", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/organization/acled" }, { "label": "HDX conflict/violence datasets", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/dataset/?vocab_Topics=conflict-violence" } ], "pattern_flags": [ "floods", "climate debt", "loss and damage", "completed starter", "public-source packet needed", "testimony-sensitive review" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-SYRIA-T-RKIYE-EARTHQUAKE-SANCTIONS-CROSS-BORDER-AID-AND-HUMANITARIAN-ACCESS-PROFILE", "title": "Syria / Türkiye earthquake — sanctions, cross-border aid and humanitarian access profile", "country": "Syria / Türkiye", "region": "Middle East", "lat": 36.2, "lon": 37.1, "status": "completed_starter_public_source_packet_needed", "overall_risk_score": 78, "evidence_strength": 60, "trust_index": 30, "demand_origins": [ "sanctions regimes", "border authorities", "donor systems" ], "presence_type": [ "earthquake response", "cross-border aid", "sanctions compliance" ], "abuse_types": [ "aid delay", "housing collapse", "medical-access harm" ], "chronology": "2023-present", "plain_diagnosis": "The Syria/Türkiye earthquake exposed how sanctions, borders and conflict politics shape disaster response.", "risk_logic": "Disaster relief must measure legal and financial obstacles, not only physical damage.", "safe_actions": [ "Create or update the public-source packet with UN/HDX, OCHA, OHCHR, ACLED/HDX, NGO, court, audit and press anchors where available.", "Classify the claim state: established public fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis, or protected-review-only.", "Add testimony and survivor/witness accounts only through protected review; never publish identifying details in the public layer.", "Identify the demand origin, funder, sponsor, arms supplier, border-control sponsor, commodity buyer or institutional beneficiary.", "Request right of reply, public records, independent investigation, remedy and preservation of evidence." ], "source_links": [ { "label": "UN OCHA Humanitarian Data Exchange (HDX) — crisis data portal", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/" }, { "label": "OCHA Knowledge Base: HDX overview", "url": "https://knowledge.base.unocha.org/wiki/spaces/imtoolbox/pages/227967035/Humanitarian+Data+Exchange+HDX" }, { "label": "ACLED on HDX — political violence and protest event data", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/organization/acled" }, { "label": "HDX conflict/violence datasets", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/dataset/?vocab_Topics=conflict-violence" } ], "pattern_flags": [ "earthquake", "sanctions", "cross-border aid", "completed starter", "public-source packet needed", "testimony-sensitive review" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-UKRAINE-WAR-HUMANITARIAN-DISPLACEMENT-CLUSTER-MUNITION-AND-ENERGY-INFRASTRUCTURE-PROFILE", "title": "Ukraine war — humanitarian displacement, cluster-munition and energy-infrastructure profile", "country": "Ukraine / Russia / NATO suppliers", "region": "Europe", "lat": 48.3794, "lon": 31.1656, "status": "completed_starter_public_source_packet_needed", "overall_risk_score": 84, "evidence_strength": 78, "trust_index": 20, "demand_origins": [ "Russia", "NATO arms suppliers", "energy-war strategy" ], "presence_type": [ "invasion", "missile/drone strikes", "energy infrastructure attacks" ], "abuse_types": [ "civilian displacement", "winterization risk", "cluster munition concern", "infrastructure harm" ], "chronology": "2022-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Ukraine is a humanitarian war profile with high data visibility but also propaganda/information-war dynamics.", "risk_logic": "Even high-visibility conflicts need testimony, local verification and care around curated data biases.", "safe_actions": [ "Create or update the public-source packet with UN/HDX, OCHA, OHCHR, ACLED/HDX, NGO, court, audit and press anchors where available.", "Classify the claim state: established public fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis, or protected-review-only.", "Add testimony and survivor/witness accounts only through protected review; never publish identifying details in the public layer.", "Identify the demand origin, funder, sponsor, arms supplier, border-control sponsor, commodity buyer or institutional beneficiary.", "Request right of reply, public records, independent investigation, remedy and preservation of evidence." ], "source_links": [ { "label": "UN OCHA Humanitarian Data Exchange (HDX) — crisis data portal", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/" }, { "label": "OCHA Knowledge Base: HDX overview", "url": "https://knowledge.base.unocha.org/wiki/spaces/imtoolbox/pages/227967035/Humanitarian+Data+Exchange+HDX" }, { "label": "ACLED on HDX — political violence and protest event data", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/organization/acled" }, { "label": "HDX conflict/violence datasets", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/dataset/?vocab_Topics=conflict-violence" } ], "pattern_flags": [ "Ukraine", "displacement", "infrastructure", "completed starter", "public-source packet needed", "testimony-sensitive review" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-ARMENIA-NAGORNO-KARABAKH-BLOCKADE-DISPLACEMENT-AND-CULTURAL-ERASURE-HUMANITARIAN-PROFILE", "title": "Armenia / Nagorno-Karabakh — blockade, displacement and cultural-erasure humanitarian profile", "country": "Nagorno-Karabakh / Armenia / Azerbaijan", "region": "Caucasus", "lat": 39.8264, "lon": 46.7636, "status": "completed_starter_public_source_packet_needed", "overall_risk_score": 86, "evidence_strength": 66, "trust_index": 20, "demand_origins": [ "Azerbaijan", "regional energy/geopolitical partners", "arms suppliers" ], "presence_type": [ "blockade", "military offensive", "heritage control" ], "abuse_types": [ "forced displacement", "food/medicine access denial", "cultural erasure risk" ], "chronology": "2020-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Nagorno-Karabakh is a blockade and displacement profile where humanitarian access and cultural survival were central.", "risk_logic": "Population flight following blockade and offensive action requires displacement and cultural-erasure review.", "safe_actions": [ "Create or update the public-source packet with UN/HDX, OCHA, OHCHR, ACLED/HDX, NGO, court, audit and press anchors where available.", "Classify the claim state: established public fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis, or protected-review-only.", "Add testimony and survivor/witness accounts only through protected review; never publish identifying details in the public layer.", "Identify the demand origin, funder, sponsor, arms supplier, border-control sponsor, commodity buyer or institutional beneficiary.", "Request right of reply, public records, independent investigation, remedy and preservation of evidence." ], "source_links": [ { "label": "UN OCHA Humanitarian Data Exchange (HDX) — crisis data portal", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/" }, { "label": "OCHA Knowledge Base: HDX overview", "url": "https://knowledge.base.unocha.org/wiki/spaces/imtoolbox/pages/227967035/Humanitarian+Data+Exchange+HDX" }, { "label": "ACLED on HDX — political violence and protest event data", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/organization/acled" }, { "label": "HDX conflict/violence datasets", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/dataset/?vocab_Topics=conflict-violence" } ], "pattern_flags": [ "blockade", "forced displacement", "cultural erasure", "completed starter", "public-source packet needed", "testimony-sensitive review" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-ECUADOR-HAITI-CARIBBEAN-DISASTER-AID-CONTRACTOR-CAPTURE-AND-ACCOUNTABILITY-PROFILE", "title": "Ecuador / Haiti / Caribbean disaster aid — contractor capture and accountability profile", "country": "Caribbean / Latin America", "region": "Caribbean / Latin America", "lat": 18.5, "lon": -72.5, "status": "completed_starter_public_source_packet_needed", "overall_risk_score": 72, "evidence_strength": 44, "trust_index": 34, "demand_origins": [ "foreign contractors", "aid agencies", "donor states" ], "presence_type": [ "disaster reconstruction", "contractor aid" ], "abuse_types": [ "aid diversion risk", "local exclusion", "sovereignty weakening" ], "chronology": "2010-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Disaster aid can become a contractor economy where local people remain powerless over rebuilding.", "risk_logic": "Humanitarian response must track who controls contracts, not only who receives aid branding.", "safe_actions": [ "Create or update the public-source packet with UN/HDX, OCHA, OHCHR, ACLED/HDX, NGO, court, audit and press anchors where available.", "Classify the claim state: established public fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis, or protected-review-only.", "Add testimony and survivor/witness accounts only through protected review; never publish identifying details in the public layer.", "Identify the demand origin, funder, sponsor, arms supplier, border-control sponsor, commodity buyer or institutional beneficiary.", "Request right of reply, public records, independent investigation, remedy and preservation of evidence." ], "source_links": [ { "label": "UN OCHA Humanitarian Data Exchange (HDX) — crisis data portal", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/" }, { "label": "OCHA Knowledge Base: HDX overview", "url": "https://knowledge.base.unocha.org/wiki/spaces/imtoolbox/pages/227967035/Humanitarian+Data+Exchange+HDX" }, { "label": "ACLED on HDX — political violence and protest event data", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/organization/acled" }, { "label": "HDX conflict/violence datasets", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/dataset/?vocab_Topics=conflict-violence" } ], "pattern_flags": [ "disaster capitalism", "contractor aid", "local exclusion", "completed starter", "public-source packet needed", "testimony-sensitive review" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-UN-PEACEKEEPING-SEA-SEXUAL-EXPLOITATION-AND-SURVIVOR-REMEDY-GLOBAL-PROFILE", "title": "UN peacekeeping SEA — sexual exploitation and survivor-remedy global profile", "country": "UN missions / affected communities", "region": "Global", "lat": 0.0, "lon": 20.0, "status": "completed_starter_public_source_packet_needed", "overall_risk_score": 84, "evidence_strength": 72, "trust_index": 20, "demand_origins": [ "UN peacekeeping systems", "troop-contributing countries", "immunity architecture" ], "presence_type": [ "peacekeeping", "SEA reporting", "immunity" ], "abuse_types": [ "sexual exploitation and abuse", "child protection", "remedy failure" ], "chronology": "1990-present", "plain_diagnosis": "UN peacekeeping sexual exploitation and abuse is a global humanitarian-protection case with repeated remedy problems.", "risk_logic": "International protection missions must be judged by survivor remedy, not institutional reputation.", "safe_actions": [ "Create or update the public-source packet with UN/HDX, OCHA, OHCHR, ACLED/HDX, NGO, court, audit and press anchors where available.", "Classify the claim state: established public fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis, or protected-review-only.", "Add testimony and survivor/witness accounts only through protected review; never publish identifying details in the public layer.", "Identify the demand origin, funder, sponsor, arms supplier, border-control sponsor, commodity buyer or institutional beneficiary.", "Request right of reply, public records, independent investigation, remedy and preservation of evidence." ], "source_links": [ { "label": "UN OCHA Humanitarian Data Exchange (HDX) — crisis data portal", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/" }, { "label": "OCHA Knowledge Base: HDX overview", "url": "https://knowledge.base.unocha.org/wiki/spaces/imtoolbox/pages/227967035/Humanitarian+Data+Exchange+HDX" }, { "label": "ACLED on HDX — political violence and protest event data", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/organization/acled" }, { "label": "HDX conflict/violence datasets", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/dataset/?vocab_Topics=conflict-violence" } ], "pattern_flags": [ "peacekeeping SEA", "immunity", "survivor remedy", "completed starter", "public-source packet needed", "testimony-sensitive review" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-HUMANITARIAN-WORKER-SECURITY-GLOBAL-ATTACKS-KIDNAPPING-AND-DATA-UNDERREPORTING-PROFILE", "title": "Humanitarian worker security — global attacks, kidnapping and data-underreporting profile", "country": "Global humanitarian operations", "region": "Global", "lat": 0.0, "lon": 20.0, "status": "completed_starter_public_source_packet_needed", "overall_risk_score": 80, "evidence_strength": 68, "trust_index": 26, "demand_origins": [ "armed actors", "state forces", "security contractors", "aid systems" ], "presence_type": [ "aid delivery", "security incidents", "field operations" ], "abuse_types": [ "aid worker killings", "kidnapping", "access denial", "underreporting" ], "chronology": "ongoing", "plain_diagnosis": "Attacks on humanitarian workers are a cross-cutting indicator of protection failure.", "risk_logic": "Curated incident data must be read with local staff testimony, because national staff and community responders are often under-protected and under-credited.", "safe_actions": [ "Create or update the public-source packet with UN/HDX, OCHA, OHCHR, ACLED/HDX, NGO, court, audit and press anchors where available.", "Classify the claim state: established public fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis, or protected-review-only.", "Add testimony and survivor/witness accounts only through protected review; never publish identifying details in the public layer.", "Identify the demand origin, funder, sponsor, arms supplier, border-control sponsor, commodity buyer or institutional beneficiary.", "Request right of reply, public records, independent investigation, remedy and preservation of evidence." ], "source_links": [ { "label": "UN OCHA Humanitarian Data Exchange (HDX) — crisis data portal", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/" }, { "label": "OCHA Knowledge Base: HDX overview", "url": "https://knowledge.base.unocha.org/wiki/spaces/imtoolbox/pages/227967035/Humanitarian+Data+Exchange+HDX" }, { "label": "ACLED on HDX — political violence and protest event data", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/organization/acled" }, { "label": "HDX conflict/violence datasets", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/dataset/?vocab_Topics=conflict-violence" } ], "pattern_flags": [ "aid worker security", "underreporting", "local staff", "completed starter", "public-source packet needed", "testimony-sensitive review" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-HEALTHCARE-UNDER-ATTACK-GLOBAL-HOSPITAL-AND-AMBULANCE-PROTECTION-PROFILE", "title": "Healthcare under attack — global hospital and ambulance protection profile", "country": "Global conflict zones", "region": "Global", "lat": 0.0, "lon": 20.0, "status": "completed_starter_public_source_packet_needed", "overall_risk_score": 84, "evidence_strength": 70, "trust_index": 24, "demand_origins": [ "state forces", "armed groups", "arms suppliers" ], "presence_type": [ "health facilities", "ambulances", "medical workers" ], "abuse_types": [ "hospital attack", "medical neutrality violation", "public-health collapse" ], "chronology": "ongoing", "plain_diagnosis": "Healthcare attacks destroy survival systems beyond the immediate strike or raid.", "risk_logic": "Medical testimony and facility-level reports are essential because deaths from collapsed care are often absent from incident datasets.", "safe_actions": [ "Create or update the public-source packet with UN/HDX, OCHA, OHCHR, ACLED/HDX, NGO, court, audit and press anchors where available.", "Classify the claim state: established public fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis, or protected-review-only.", "Add testimony and survivor/witness accounts only through protected review; never publish identifying details in the public layer.", "Identify the demand origin, funder, sponsor, arms supplier, border-control sponsor, commodity buyer or institutional beneficiary.", "Request right of reply, public records, independent investigation, remedy and preservation of evidence." ], "source_links": [ { "label": "UN OCHA Humanitarian Data Exchange (HDX) — crisis data portal", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/" }, { "label": "OCHA Knowledge Base: HDX overview", "url": "https://knowledge.base.unocha.org/wiki/spaces/imtoolbox/pages/227967035/Humanitarian+Data+Exchange+HDX" }, { "label": "ACLED on HDX — political violence and protest event data", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/organization/acled" }, { "label": "HDX conflict/violence datasets", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/dataset/?vocab_Topics=conflict-violence" } ], "pattern_flags": [ "healthcare attacks", "medical neutrality", "indirect deaths", "completed starter", "public-source packet needed", "testimony-sensitive review" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-EDUCATION-UNDER-ATTACK-SCHOOLS-TEACHERS-AND-CHILD-PROTECTION-HUMANITARIAN-PROFILE", "title": "Education under attack — schools, teachers and child-protection humanitarian profile", "country": "Global conflict zones", "region": "Global", "lat": 0.0, "lon": 20.0, "status": "completed_starter_public_source_packet_needed", "overall_risk_score": 80, "evidence_strength": 64, "trust_index": 28, "demand_origins": [ "state forces", "armed groups", "occupation systems" ], "presence_type": [ "schools", "teachers", "school militarization" ], "abuse_types": [ "school attacks", "child recruitment", "girls education denial", "displacement" ], "chronology": "ongoing", "plain_diagnosis": "Education attacks are a population-future harm, not only a child-protection issue.", "risk_logic": "A destroyed school is also a destroyed civilizational capability.", "safe_actions": [ "Create or update the public-source packet with UN/HDX, OCHA, OHCHR, ACLED/HDX, NGO, court, audit and press anchors where available.", "Classify the claim state: established public fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis, or protected-review-only.", "Add testimony and survivor/witness accounts only through protected review; never publish identifying details in the public layer.", "Identify the demand origin, funder, sponsor, arms supplier, border-control sponsor, commodity buyer or institutional beneficiary.", "Request right of reply, public records, independent investigation, remedy and preservation of evidence." ], "source_links": [ { "label": "UN OCHA Humanitarian Data Exchange (HDX) — crisis data portal", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/" }, { "label": "OCHA Knowledge Base: HDX overview", "url": "https://knowledge.base.unocha.org/wiki/spaces/imtoolbox/pages/227967035/Humanitarian+Data+Exchange+HDX" }, { "label": "ACLED on HDX — political violence and protest event data", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/organization/acled" }, { "label": "HDX conflict/violence datasets", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/dataset/?vocab_Topics=conflict-violence" } ], "pattern_flags": [ "education under attack", "child protection", "future harm", "completed starter", "public-source packet needed", "testimony-sensitive review" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-HUMANITARIAN-DATA-GAP-UNDERREPORTED-VICTIMS-TESTIMONY-AND-CURATED-DATA-LIMITATION-PROFILE", "title": "Humanitarian data gap — underreported victims, testimony and curated-data limitation profile", "country": "Global", "region": "Global", "lat": 0.0, "lon": 20.0, "status": "completed_starter_public_source_packet_needed", "overall_risk_score": 76, "evidence_strength": 72, "trust_index": 30, "demand_origins": [ "data systems", "media access constraints", "state/armed censorship" ], "presence_type": [ "humanitarian datasets", "incident reporting", "testimony" ], "abuse_types": [ "undercounting", "reporting bias", "victim invisibility", "evidence suppression" ], "chronology": "ongoing", "plain_diagnosis": "PASO should explicitly warn that curated datasets are not the full truth. They are starting points that must be expanded with victim testimony, survivor testimony, field reports, local journalists, health workers and protected witnesses.", "risk_logic": "Where access is restricted or the powerful control reporting, undercounting is expected. The testimony layer is not optional; it is a protection necessity.", "safe_actions": [ "Create or update the public-source packet with UN/HDX, OCHA, OHCHR, ACLED/HDX, NGO, court, audit and press anchors where available.", "Classify the claim state: established public fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis, or protected-review-only.", "Add testimony and survivor/witness accounts only through protected review; never publish identifying details in the public layer.", "Identify the demand origin, funder, sponsor, arms supplier, border-control sponsor, commodity buyer or institutional beneficiary.", "Request right of reply, public records, independent investigation, remedy and preservation of evidence." ], "source_links": [ { "label": "UN OCHA Humanitarian Data Exchange (HDX) — crisis data portal", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/" }, { "label": "OCHA Knowledge Base: HDX overview", "url": "https://knowledge.base.unocha.org/wiki/spaces/imtoolbox/pages/227967035/Humanitarian+Data+Exchange+HDX" }, { "label": "ACLED on HDX — political violence and protest event data", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/organization/acled" }, { "label": "HDX conflict/violence datasets", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/dataset/?vocab_Topics=conflict-violence" } ], "pattern_flags": [ "data gap", "victim testimony", "undercounting", "completed starter", "public-source packet needed", "testimony-sensitive review" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-STARTER-001-FORCED-DISPLACEMENT-BY-INFRASTRUCTURE-AND-ACCOUNTABILITY-EVASION-REVIEW", "title": "Pending source packet 001 — forced displacement by infrastructure and accountability-evasion review", "country": "Transnational starter profile", "region": "Latin America / United States", "lat": -9.1, "lon": -59.1, "status": "pending_named_case_to_replace", "overall_risk_score": 63, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 32, "demand_origins": [ "United States", "corporate markets", "security assistance" ], "presence_type": [ "mega-projects", "land acquisition" ], "abuse_types": [ "community displacement", "livelihood loss", "elite contracts" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Temporary placeholder retained only to preserve the 150-case architecture. Replace with a named case and public-source packet.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "infrastructure displacement", "land", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-STARTER-002-CHEMICAL-DUMPING-AND-ACCOUNTABILITY-EVASION-REVIEW", "title": "Pending source packet 002 — chemical dumping and accountability-evasion review", "country": "Transnational starter profile", "region": "Asia / Global", "lat": 21.8, "lon": 91.8, "status": "pending_named_case_to_replace", "overall_risk_score": 64, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 31, "demand_origins": [ "United States", "China", "Japan", "global commodity markets" ], "presence_type": [ "industrial waste", "weak regulation" ], "abuse_types": [ "water/soil pollution", "health burden", "accountability evasion" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Temporary placeholder retained only to preserve the 150-case architecture. Replace with a named case and public-source packet.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "chemical dumping", "toxic trade", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-STARTER-003-SECURITY-CONTRACTOR-ABUSE-AND-ACCOUNTABILITY-EVASION-REVIEW", "title": "Pending source packet 003 — security contractor abuse and accountability-evasion review", "country": "Transnational starter profile", "region": "Middle East / Gulf", "lat": 27.7, "lon": 47.7, "status": "pending_named_case_to_replace", "overall_risk_score": 65, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 30, "demand_origins": [ "UAE", "Qatar", "Saudi Arabia", "Western arms suppliers" ], "presence_type": [ "private security", "resource protection" ], "abuse_types": [ "civilian harm allegation", "impunity", "resource capture" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Temporary placeholder retained only to preserve the 150-case architecture. Replace with a named case and public-source packet.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "contractor abuse", "resource protection", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-STARTER-004-TRAFFICKING-ROUTE-AND-ACCOUNTABILITY-EVASION-REVIEW", "title": "Pending source packet 004 — trafficking route and accountability-evasion review", "country": "Transnational starter profile", "region": "Global", "lat": 3.6, "lon": 3.6, "status": "pending_named_case_to_replace", "overall_risk_score": 66, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 29, "demand_origins": [ "US/EU markets", "financial institutions", "technology companies" ], "presence_type": [ "migration routes", "smuggling economy" ], "abuse_types": [ "trafficking allegation", "extortion", "detention abuse" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Temporary placeholder retained only to preserve the 150-case architecture. Replace with a named case and public-source packet.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "trafficking route", "migration", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-STARTER-005-MEDICAL-EXTRACTION-AND-ACCOUNTABILITY-EVASION-REVIEW", "title": "Pending source packet 005 — medical extraction and accountability-evasion review", "country": "Transnational starter profile", "region": "Africa / Europe", "lat": 4.5, "lon": 24.5, "status": "pending_named_case_to_replace", "overall_risk_score": 67, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 28, "demand_origins": [ "European Union", "France", "United Kingdom", "commodity markets" ], "presence_type": [ "clinical research", "sample export" ], "abuse_types": [ "consent failure", "data extraction", "benefit exclusion" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Temporary placeholder retained only to preserve the 150-case architecture. Replace with a named case and public-source packet.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "medical extraction", "consent", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-STARTER-006-DEBT-TRAP-AND-ACCOUNTABILITY-EVASION-REVIEW", "title": "Pending source packet 006 — debt trap and accountability-evasion review", "country": "Transnational starter profile", "region": "Latin America / United States", "lat": -4.6, "lon": -54.6, "status": "pending_named_case_to_replace", "overall_risk_score": 68, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 27, "demand_origins": [ "United States", "corporate markets", "security assistance" ], "presence_type": [ "debt finance", "policy conditionality" ], "abuse_types": [ "sovereignty pressure", "public-service harm", "elite contract opacity" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Temporary placeholder retained only to preserve the 150-case architecture. Replace with a named case and public-source packet.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "debt trap", "policy capture", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-STARTER-007-LAND-GRAB-AND-ACCOUNTABILITY-EVASION-REVIEW", "title": "Pending source packet 007 — land grab and accountability-evasion review", "country": "Transnational starter profile", "region": "Asia / Global", "lat": 20.0, "lon": 96.3, "status": "pending_named_case_to_replace", "overall_risk_score": 69, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 26, "demand_origins": [ "United States", "China", "Japan", "global commodity markets" ], "presence_type": [ "agribusiness", "land concession" ], "abuse_types": [ "land dispossession", "food sovereignty harm", "community displacement" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Temporary placeholder retained only to preserve the 150-case architecture. Replace with a named case and public-source packet.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "land grab", "food sovereignty", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-STARTER-008-POLLUTING-INDUSTRIAL-CORRIDOR-AND-ACCOUNTABILITY-EVASION-REVIEW", "title": "Pending source packet 008 — polluting industrial corridor and accountability-evasion review", "country": "Transnational starter profile", "region": "Middle East / Gulf", "lat": 25.9, "lon": 52.2, "status": "pending_named_case_to_replace", "overall_risk_score": 70, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 25, "demand_origins": [ "UAE", "Qatar", "Saudi Arabia", "Western arms suppliers" ], "presence_type": [ "industrial plants", "logistics corridor" ], "abuse_types": [ "air pollution", "racialized siting", "community health harm" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Temporary placeholder retained only to preserve the 150-case architecture. Replace with a named case and public-source packet.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "industrial corridor", "pollution", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-STARTER-009-MEDIA-LAUNDERING-AND-ACCOUNTABILITY-EVASION-REVIEW", "title": "Pending source packet 009 — media laundering and accountability-evasion review", "country": "Transnational starter profile", "region": "Global", "lat": 1.8, "lon": 8.1, "status": "pending_named_case_to_replace", "overall_risk_score": 71, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 24, "demand_origins": [ "US/EU markets", "financial institutions", "technology companies" ], "presence_type": [ "media ecosystem", "think-tank reports" ], "abuse_types": [ "narrative capture", "victim blaming", "accountability evasion" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Temporary placeholder retained only to preserve the 150-case architecture. Replace with a named case and public-source packet.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "media laundering", "narrative capture", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-STARTER-010-ORGAN-TRAFFICKING-ALLEGATION-MATRIX-AND-ACCOUNTABILITY-EVASION-REVIEW", "title": "Pending source packet 010 — organ trafficking allegation matrix and accountability-evasion review", "country": "Transnational starter profile", "region": "Africa / Europe", "lat": 2.7, "lon": 29.0, "status": "pending_named_case_to_replace", "overall_risk_score": 72, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 23, "demand_origins": [ "European Union", "France", "United Kingdom", "commodity markets" ], "presence_type": [ "detention systems", "trafficking networks" ], "abuse_types": [ "organ trafficking allegation", "disappearance pattern", "investigation failure" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Temporary placeholder retained only to preserve the 150-case architecture. Replace with a named case and public-source packet.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "organ trafficking allegation", "protected review", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-STARTER-011-BIOSECURITY-CROP-COLLAPSE-ALLEGATION-MATRIX-AND-ACCOUNTABILITY-EVASION-REVIEW", "title": "Pending source packet 011 — biosecurity crop collapse allegation matrix and accountability-evasion review", "country": "Transnational starter profile", "region": "Latin America / United States", "lat": -6.4, "lon": -60.0, "status": "pending_named_case_to_replace", "overall_risk_score": 73, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 22, "demand_origins": [ "United States", "corporate markets", "security assistance" ], "presence_type": [ "pathogen investigation", "agricultural markets" ], "abuse_types": [ "crop collapse", "food sovereignty harm", "bioterrorism allegation" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Temporary placeholder retained only to preserve the 150-case architecture. Replace with a named case and public-source packet.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "biosecurity", "crop collapse", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-STARTER-012-WATER-PRIVATIZATION-AND-ACCOUNTABILITY-EVASION-REVIEW", "title": "Pending source packet 012 — water privatization and accountability-evasion review", "country": "Transnational starter profile", "region": "Asia / Global", "lat": 24.5, "lon": 90.9, "status": "pending_named_case_to_replace", "overall_risk_score": 74, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 21, "demand_origins": [ "United States", "China", "Japan", "global commodity markets" ], "presence_type": [ "water concessions", "tariff systems" ], "abuse_types": [ "water exclusion", "public-health harm", "debt pressure" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Temporary placeholder retained only to preserve the 150-case architecture. Replace with a named case and public-source packet.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "water privatization", "public health", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-STARTER-013-FORCED-DISPLACEMENT-BY-INFRASTRUCTURE-AND-ACCOUNTABILITY-EVASION-REVIEW", "title": "Pending source packet 013 — forced displacement by infrastructure and accountability-evasion review", "country": "Transnational starter profile", "region": "Middle East / Gulf", "lat": 30.4, "lon": 46.8, "status": "pending_named_case_to_replace", "overall_risk_score": 75, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 20, "demand_origins": [ "UAE", "Qatar", "Saudi Arabia", "Western arms suppliers" ], "presence_type": [ "mega-projects", "land acquisition" ], "abuse_types": [ "community displacement", "livelihood loss", "elite contracts" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Temporary placeholder retained only to preserve the 150-case architecture. Replace with a named case and public-source packet.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "infrastructure displacement", "land", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-STARTER-014-CHEMICAL-DUMPING-AND-ACCOUNTABILITY-EVASION-REVIEW", "title": "Pending source packet 014 — chemical dumping and accountability-evasion review", "country": "Transnational starter profile", "region": "Global", "lat": 0.0, "lon": 2.7, "status": "pending_named_case_to_replace", "overall_risk_score": 76, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 19, "demand_origins": [ "US/EU markets", "financial institutions", "technology companies" ], "presence_type": [ "industrial waste", "weak regulation" ], "abuse_types": [ "water/soil pollution", "health burden", "accountability evasion" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Temporary placeholder retained only to preserve the 150-case architecture. Replace with a named case and public-source packet.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "chemical dumping", "toxic trade", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-STARTER-015-SECURITY-CONTRACTOR-ABUSE-AND-ACCOUNTABILITY-EVASION-REVIEW", "title": "Pending source packet 015 — security contractor abuse and accountability-evasion review", "country": "Transnational starter profile", "region": "Africa / Europe", "lat": 0.9, "lon": 23.6, "status": "pending_named_case_to_replace", "overall_risk_score": 77, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 18, "demand_origins": [ "European Union", "France", "United Kingdom", "commodity markets" ], "presence_type": [ "private security", "resource protection" ], "abuse_types": [ "civilian harm allegation", "impunity", "resource capture" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Temporary placeholder retained only to preserve the 150-case architecture. Replace with a named case and public-source packet.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "contractor abuse", "resource protection", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-STARTER-016-TRAFFICKING-ROUTE-AND-ACCOUNTABILITY-EVASION-REVIEW", "title": "Pending source packet 016 — trafficking route and accountability-evasion review", "country": "Transnational starter profile", "region": "Latin America / United States", "lat": -8.2, "lon": -55.5, "status": "pending_named_case_to_replace", "overall_risk_score": 78, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 17, "demand_origins": [ "United States", "corporate markets", "security assistance" ], "presence_type": [ "migration routes", "smuggling economy" ], "abuse_types": [ "trafficking allegation", "extortion", "detention abuse" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Temporary placeholder retained only to preserve the 150-case architecture. Replace with a named case and public-source packet.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "trafficking route", "migration", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-STARTER-017-MEDICAL-EXTRACTION-AND-ACCOUNTABILITY-EVASION-REVIEW", "title": "Pending source packet 017 — medical extraction and accountability-evasion review", "country": "Transnational starter profile", "region": "Asia / Global", "lat": 22.7, "lon": 95.4, "status": "pending_named_case_to_replace", "overall_risk_score": 79, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 16, "demand_origins": [ "United States", "China", "Japan", "global commodity markets" ], "presence_type": [ "clinical research", "sample export" ], "abuse_types": [ "consent failure", "data extraction", "benefit exclusion" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Temporary placeholder retained only to preserve the 150-case architecture. Replace with a named case and public-source packet.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "medical extraction", "consent", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-STARTER-018-DEBT-TRAP-AND-ACCOUNTABILITY-EVASION-REVIEW", "title": "Pending source packet 018 — debt trap and accountability-evasion review", "country": "Transnational starter profile", "region": "Middle East / Gulf", "lat": 28.6, "lon": 51.3, "status": "pending_named_case_to_replace", "overall_risk_score": 80, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 15, "demand_origins": [ "UAE", "Qatar", "Saudi Arabia", "Western arms suppliers" ], "presence_type": [ "debt finance", "policy conditionality" ], "abuse_types": [ "sovereignty pressure", "public-service harm", "elite contract opacity" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Temporary placeholder retained only to preserve the 150-case architecture. Replace with a named case and public-source packet.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "debt trap", "policy capture", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-STARTER-019-LAND-GRAB-AND-ACCOUNTABILITY-EVASION-REVIEW", "title": "Pending source packet 019 — land grab and accountability-evasion review", "country": "Transnational starter profile", "region": "Global", "lat": 4.5, "lon": 7.2, "status": "pending_named_case_to_replace", "overall_risk_score": 81, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 14, "demand_origins": [ "US/EU markets", "financial institutions", "technology companies" ], "presence_type": [ "agribusiness", "land concession" ], "abuse_types": [ "land dispossession", "food sovereignty harm", "community displacement" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Temporary placeholder retained only to preserve the 150-case architecture. Replace with a named case and public-source packet.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "land grab", "food sovereignty", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-STARTER-020-POLLUTING-INDUSTRIAL-CORRIDOR-AND-ACCOUNTABILITY-EVASION-REVIEW", "title": "Pending source packet 020 — polluting industrial corridor and accountability-evasion review", "country": "Transnational starter profile", "region": "Africa / Europe", "lat": 5.4, "lon": 28.1, "status": "pending_named_case_to_replace", "overall_risk_score": 82, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 13, "demand_origins": [ "European Union", "France", "United Kingdom", "commodity markets" ], "presence_type": [ "industrial plants", "logistics corridor" ], "abuse_types": [ "air pollution", "racialized siting", "community health harm" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Temporary placeholder retained only to preserve the 150-case architecture. Replace with a named case and public-source packet.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "industrial corridor", "pollution", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-STARTER-021-MEDIA-LAUNDERING-AND-ACCOUNTABILITY-EVASION-REVIEW", "title": "Pending source packet 021 — media laundering and accountability-evasion review", "country": "Transnational starter profile", "region": "Latin America / United States", "lat": -10.0, "lon": -51.0, "status": "pending_named_case_to_replace", "overall_risk_score": 83, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 12, "demand_origins": [ "United States", "corporate markets", "security assistance" ], "presence_type": [ "media ecosystem", "think-tank reports" ], "abuse_types": [ "narrative capture", "victim blaming", "accountability evasion" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Temporary placeholder retained only to preserve the 150-case architecture. Replace with a named case and public-source packet.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "media laundering", "narrative capture", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-STARTER-022-ORGAN-TRAFFICKING-ALLEGATION-MATRIX-AND-ACCOUNTABILITY-EVASION-REVIEW", "title": "Pending source packet 022 — organ trafficking allegation matrix and accountability-evasion review", "country": "Transnational starter profile", "region": "Asia / Global", "lat": 20.9, "lon": 90.0, "status": "pending_named_case_to_replace", "overall_risk_score": 84, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 11, "demand_origins": [ "United States", "China", "Japan", "global commodity markets" ], "presence_type": [ "detention systems", "trafficking networks" ], "abuse_types": [ "organ trafficking allegation", "disappearance pattern", "investigation failure" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Temporary placeholder retained only to preserve the 150-case architecture. Replace with a named case and public-source packet.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "organ trafficking allegation", "protected review", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-STARTER-023-BIOSECURITY-CROP-COLLAPSE-ALLEGATION-MATRIX-AND-ACCOUNTABILITY-EVASION-REVIEW", "title": "Pending source packet 023 — biosecurity crop collapse allegation matrix and accountability-evasion review", "country": "Transnational starter profile", "region": "Middle East / Gulf", "lat": 26.8, "lon": 45.9, "status": "pending_named_case_to_replace", "overall_risk_score": 85, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 10, "demand_origins": [ "UAE", "Qatar", "Saudi Arabia", "Western arms suppliers" ], "presence_type": [ "pathogen investigation", "agricultural markets" ], "abuse_types": [ "crop collapse", "food sovereignty harm", "bioterrorism allegation" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Temporary placeholder retained only to preserve the 150-case architecture. Replace with a named case and public-source packet.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "biosecurity", "crop collapse", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-STARTER-024-WATER-PRIVATIZATION-AND-ACCOUNTABILITY-EVASION-REVIEW", "title": "Pending source packet 024 — water privatization and accountability-evasion review", "country": "Transnational starter profile", "region": "Global", "lat": 2.7, "lon": 1.8, "status": "pending_named_case_to_replace", "overall_risk_score": 86, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 10, "demand_origins": [ "US/EU markets", "financial institutions", "technology companies" ], "presence_type": [ "water concessions", "tariff systems" ], "abuse_types": [ "water exclusion", "public-health harm", "debt pressure" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Temporary placeholder retained only to preserve the 150-case architecture. Replace with a named case and public-source packet.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "water privatization", "public health", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-STARTER-025-FORCED-DISPLACEMENT-BY-INFRASTRUCTURE-AND-ACCOUNTABILITY-EVASION-REVIEW", "title": "Pending source packet 025 — forced displacement by infrastructure and accountability-evasion review", "country": "Transnational starter profile", "region": "Africa / Europe", "lat": 3.6, "lon": 22.7, "status": "pending_named_case_to_replace", "overall_risk_score": 87, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 10, "demand_origins": [ "European Union", "France", "United Kingdom", "commodity markets" ], "presence_type": [ "mega-projects", "land acquisition" ], "abuse_types": [ "community displacement", "livelihood loss", "elite contracts" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Temporary placeholder retained only to preserve the 150-case architecture. Replace with a named case and public-source packet.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "infrastructure displacement", "land", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-STARTER-026-CHEMICAL-DUMPING-AND-ACCOUNTABILITY-EVASION-REVIEW", "title": "Pending source packet 026 — chemical dumping and accountability-evasion review", "country": "Transnational starter profile", "region": "Latin America / United States", "lat": -5.5, "lon": -56.4, "status": "pending_named_case_to_replace", "overall_risk_score": 88, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 10, "demand_origins": [ "United States", "corporate markets", "security assistance" ], "presence_type": [ "industrial waste", "weak regulation" ], "abuse_types": [ "water/soil pollution", "health burden", "accountability evasion" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Temporary placeholder retained only to preserve the 150-case architecture. Replace with a named case and public-source packet.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "chemical dumping", "toxic trade", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-STARTER-027-SECURITY-CONTRACTOR-ABUSE-AND-ACCOUNTABILITY-EVASION-REVIEW", "title": "Pending source packet 027 — security contractor abuse and accountability-evasion review", "country": "Transnational starter profile", "region": "Asia / Global", "lat": 25.4, "lon": 94.5, "status": "pending_named_case_to_replace", "overall_risk_score": 89, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 10, "demand_origins": [ "United States", "China", "Japan", "global commodity markets" ], "presence_type": [ "private security", "resource protection" ], "abuse_types": [ "civilian harm allegation", "impunity", "resource capture" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Temporary placeholder retained only to preserve the 150-case architecture. Replace with a named case and public-source packet.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "contractor abuse", "resource protection", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-STARTER-028-TRAFFICKING-ROUTE-AND-ACCOUNTABILITY-EVASION-REVIEW", "title": "Pending source packet 028 — trafficking route and accountability-evasion review", "country": "Transnational starter profile", "region": "Middle East / Gulf", "lat": 25.0, "lon": 50.4, "status": "pending_named_case_to_replace", "overall_risk_score": 62, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 33, "demand_origins": [ "UAE", "Qatar", "Saudi Arabia", "Western arms suppliers" ], "presence_type": [ "migration routes", "smuggling economy" ], "abuse_types": [ "trafficking allegation", "extortion", "detention abuse" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Temporary placeholder retained only to preserve the 150-case architecture. Replace with a named case and public-source packet.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "trafficking route", "migration", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-STARTER-029-MEDICAL-EXTRACTION-AND-ACCOUNTABILITY-EVASION-REVIEW", "title": "Pending source packet 029 — medical extraction and accountability-evasion review", "country": "Transnational starter profile", "region": "Global", "lat": 0.9, "lon": 6.3, "status": "pending_named_case_to_replace", "overall_risk_score": 63, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 32, "demand_origins": [ "US/EU markets", "financial institutions", "technology companies" ], "presence_type": [ "clinical research", "sample export" ], "abuse_types": [ "consent failure", "data extraction", "benefit exclusion" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Temporary placeholder retained only to preserve the 150-case architecture. Replace with a named case and public-source packet.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "medical extraction", "consent", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-STARTER-030-DEBT-TRAP-AND-ACCOUNTABILITY-EVASION-REVIEW", "title": "Pending source packet 030 — debt trap and accountability-evasion review", "country": "Transnational starter profile", "region": "Africa / Europe", "lat": 1.8, "lon": 27.2, "status": "pending_named_case_to_replace", "overall_risk_score": 64, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 31, "demand_origins": [ "European Union", "France", "United Kingdom", "commodity markets" ], "presence_type": [ "debt finance", "policy conditionality" ], "abuse_types": [ "sovereignty pressure", "public-service harm", "elite contract opacity" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Temporary placeholder retained only to preserve the 150-case architecture. Replace with a named case and public-source packet.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "debt trap", "policy capture", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-STARTER-031-LAND-GRAB-AND-ACCOUNTABILITY-EVASION-REVIEW", "title": "Pending source packet 031 — land grab and accountability-evasion review", "country": "Transnational starter profile", "region": "Latin America / United States", "lat": -7.3, "lon": -51.9, "status": "pending_named_case_to_replace", "overall_risk_score": 65, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 30, "demand_origins": [ "United States", "corporate markets", "security assistance" ], "presence_type": [ "agribusiness", "land concession" ], "abuse_types": [ "land dispossession", "food sovereignty harm", "community displacement" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Temporary placeholder retained only to preserve the 150-case architecture. Replace with a named case and public-source packet.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "land grab", "food sovereignty", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-STARTER-032-POLLUTING-INDUSTRIAL-CORRIDOR-AND-ACCOUNTABILITY-EVASION-REVIEW", "title": "Pending source packet 032 — polluting industrial corridor and accountability-evasion review", "country": "Transnational starter profile", "region": "Asia / Global", "lat": 23.6, "lon": 99.0, "status": "pending_named_case_to_replace", "overall_risk_score": 66, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 29, "demand_origins": [ "United States", "China", "Japan", "global commodity markets" ], "presence_type": [ "industrial plants", "logistics corridor" ], "abuse_types": [ "air pollution", "racialized siting", "community health harm" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Temporary placeholder retained only to preserve the 150-case architecture. Replace with a named case and public-source packet.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "industrial corridor", "pollution", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-STARTER-033-MEDIA-LAUNDERING-AND-ACCOUNTABILITY-EVASION-REVIEW", "title": "Pending source packet 033 — media laundering and accountability-evasion review", "country": "Transnational starter profile", "region": "Middle East / Gulf", "lat": 29.5, "lon": 45.0, "status": "pending_named_case_to_replace", "overall_risk_score": 67, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 28, "demand_origins": [ "UAE", "Qatar", "Saudi Arabia", "Western arms suppliers" ], "presence_type": [ "media ecosystem", "think-tank reports" ], "abuse_types": [ "narrative capture", "victim blaming", "accountability evasion" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Temporary placeholder retained only to preserve the 150-case architecture. Replace with a named case and public-source packet.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "media laundering", "narrative capture", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-STARTER-034-ORGAN-TRAFFICKING-ALLEGATION-MATRIX-AND-ACCOUNTABILITY-EVASION-REVIEW", "title": "Pending source packet 034 — organ trafficking allegation matrix and accountability-evasion review", "country": "Transnational starter profile", "region": "Global", "lat": 5.4, "lon": 0.9, "status": "pending_named_case_to_replace", "overall_risk_score": 68, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 27, "demand_origins": [ "US/EU markets", "financial institutions", "technology companies" ], "presence_type": [ "detention systems", "trafficking networks" ], "abuse_types": [ "organ trafficking allegation", "disappearance pattern", "investigation failure" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Temporary placeholder retained only to preserve the 150-case architecture. Replace with a named case and public-source packet.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "organ trafficking allegation", "protected review", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-STARTER-035-BIOSECURITY-CROP-COLLAPSE-ALLEGATION-MATRIX-AND-ACCOUNTABILITY-EVASION-REVIEW", "title": "Pending source packet 035 — biosecurity crop collapse allegation matrix and accountability-evasion review", "country": "Transnational starter profile", "region": "Africa / Europe", "lat": 0.0, "lon": 21.8, "status": "pending_named_case_to_replace", "overall_risk_score": 69, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 26, "demand_origins": [ "European Union", "France", "United Kingdom", "commodity markets" ], "presence_type": [ "pathogen investigation", "agricultural markets" ], "abuse_types": [ "crop collapse", "food sovereignty harm", "bioterrorism allegation" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Temporary placeholder retained only to preserve the 150-case architecture. Replace with a named case and public-source packet.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "biosecurity", "crop collapse", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-STARTER-036-WATER-PRIVATIZATION-AND-ACCOUNTABILITY-EVASION-REVIEW", "title": "Pending source packet 036 — water privatization and accountability-evasion review", "country": "Transnational starter profile", "region": "Latin America / United States", "lat": -9.1, "lon": -57.3, "status": "pending_named_case_to_replace", "overall_risk_score": 70, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 25, "demand_origins": [ "United States", "corporate markets", "security assistance" ], "presence_type": [ "water concessions", "tariff systems" ], "abuse_types": [ "water exclusion", "public-health harm", "debt pressure" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Temporary placeholder retained only to preserve the 150-case architecture. Replace with a named case and public-source packet.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "water privatization", "public health", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-STARTER-037-FORCED-DISPLACEMENT-BY-INFRASTRUCTURE-AND-ACCOUNTABILITY-EVASION-REVIEW", "title": "Pending source packet 037 — forced displacement by infrastructure and accountability-evasion review", "country": "Transnational starter profile", "region": "Asia / Global", "lat": 21.8, "lon": 93.6, "status": "pending_named_case_to_replace", "overall_risk_score": 71, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 24, "demand_origins": [ "United States", "China", "Japan", "global commodity markets" ], "presence_type": [ "mega-projects", "land acquisition" ], "abuse_types": [ "community displacement", "livelihood loss", "elite contracts" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Temporary placeholder retained only to preserve the 150-case architecture. Replace with a named case and public-source packet.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "infrastructure displacement", "land", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-STARTER-038-CHEMICAL-DUMPING-AND-ACCOUNTABILITY-EVASION-REVIEW", "title": "Pending source packet 038 — chemical dumping and accountability-evasion review", "country": "Transnational starter profile", "region": "Middle East / Gulf", "lat": 27.7, "lon": 49.5, "status": "pending_named_case_to_replace", "overall_risk_score": 72, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 23, "demand_origins": [ "UAE", "Qatar", "Saudi Arabia", "Western arms suppliers" ], "presence_type": [ "industrial waste", "weak regulation" ], "abuse_types": [ "water/soil pollution", "health burden", "accountability evasion" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Temporary placeholder retained only to preserve the 150-case architecture. Replace with a named case and public-source packet.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "chemical dumping", "toxic trade", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-STARTER-039-SECURITY-CONTRACTOR-ABUSE-AND-ACCOUNTABILITY-EVASION-REVIEW", "title": "Pending source packet 039 — security contractor abuse and accountability-evasion review", "country": "Transnational starter profile", "region": "Global", "lat": 3.6, "lon": 5.4, "status": "pending_named_case_to_replace", "overall_risk_score": 73, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 22, "demand_origins": [ "US/EU markets", "financial institutions", "technology companies" ], "presence_type": [ "private security", "resource protection" ], "abuse_types": [ "civilian harm allegation", "impunity", "resource capture" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Temporary placeholder retained only to preserve the 150-case architecture. Replace with a named case and public-source packet.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "contractor abuse", "resource protection", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-STARTER-040-TRAFFICKING-ROUTE-AND-ACCOUNTABILITY-EVASION-REVIEW", "title": "Pending source packet 040 — trafficking route and accountability-evasion review", "country": "Transnational starter profile", "region": "Africa / Europe", "lat": 4.5, "lon": 26.3, "status": "pending_named_case_to_replace", "overall_risk_score": 74, "evidence_strength": 38, "trust_index": 21, "demand_origins": [ "European Union", "France", "United Kingdom", "commodity markets" ], "presence_type": [ "migration routes", "smuggling economy" ], "abuse_types": [ "trafficking allegation", "extortion", "detention abuse" ], "chronology": "historical-present", "plain_diagnosis": "Temporary placeholder retained only to preserve the 150-case architecture. Replace with a named case and public-source packet.", "risk_logic": "PASO does not treat admission by the powerful party as the only valid evidence threshold. Where repeated harm, demand-side benefit, weak remedy, dismissal of complaints or suppressed investigation appear together, the case qualifies for public investigation-threshold mapping until the evidence class is clarified.", "safe_actions": [ "Create a public-source packet with archived URLs and primary records where available.", "Classify each claim: established fact, public allegation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis or protected-review-only.", "Identify demand origin, funder, buyer, sponsor, patron, corporate beneficiary or legal beneficiary.", "Request correction, right of reply, public records and independent review.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "trafficking route", "migration", "starter profile", "source-linking needed", "right-of-reply required" ], "source_classification": { "affected_community_testimony": "not_yet_linked", "local_independent_sources": "not_yet_linked", "international_or_un_sources": "not_yet_linked", "accused_party_or_hostile_media_only": "insufficient_for_final_adverse_finding", "paso_rule": "Hostile media, rival-state media or interested-power claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated by victim testimony, local sources, legal records, UN/independent findings or protected review." } }, { "record_id": "HEATMAP-SOURCE-ORIGIN-DISCIPLINE-PARAMILITARY-PROPAGANDA", "title": "Source-origin discipline — paramilitary, PMC and propaganda-sensitive allegations", "country": "Global", "region": "Global", "lat": 0.0, "lon": 0.0, "status": "method_record", "overall_risk_score": 70, "evidence_strength": 80, "trust_index": 70, "demand_origins": [ "information warfare systems", "rival-state media ecosystems", "security-policy narratives" ], "presence_type": [ "paramilitary / PMC / auxiliary force", "media ecosystem", "legal review" ], "abuse_types": [ "propaganda laundering risk", "false attribution risk", "victim testimony underweighting", "source-origin manipulation" ], "chronology": "ongoing", "plain_diagnosis": "PASO must not let powerful or hostile media ecosystems define abuse reality. For paramilitary/PMC allegations, claims from victims, affected communities, local independent sources, court records, UN/independent investigations or protected testimony carry more weight than claims repeated only by rival states or aligned media.", "risk_logic": "Two risks must be assessed together: real paramilitary abuse and propaganda laundering. A claim from a hostile geopolitical actor is not discarded, but it is not treated as final evidence. It remains an investigation trigger until corroborated by affected-community testimony or independent records.", "safe_actions": [ "Tag every adverse allegation with source origin: victim/community, local independent, UN/independent, court/legal, accused party, rival-state media, hostile media, anonymous.", "Raise evidence score only when affected-community testimony, local reporting, legal records or independent investigations corroborate the claim.", "Lower confidence where the claim comes mainly from a strategically hostile media ecosystem.", "Keep the record open for corrections and right of reply.", "Protect victims and witnesses; do not force public exposure to validate abuse." ], "source_links": [], "pattern_flags": [ "method record", "source-origin discipline", "propaganda-sensitive", "paramilitary review" ] } ], "safe_action_steps": [ "Start with public datasets and public sources: UN OCHA HDX, ACLED/HDX, OCHA, OHCHR, IOM, WHO, UNHCR, UNICEF, WFP, court records, parliamentary records, NGO reports and archived media.", "Add testimony layers carefully: victims, survivors, local health workers, aid workers, journalists, community leaders and protected witnesses are not replaced by curated datasets.", "Classify every claim: established public fact, public allegation, accusation, unresolved complaint, risk hypothesis, legal question or protected-review-only material.", "Make the demand origin visible: border-control sponsor, arms supplier, donor condition, blockade authority, military patron, corporate beneficiary, funder, buyer or legal beneficiary.", "Treat underreporting as a risk condition where access is blocked, communications are cut, aid is denied, journalists are targeted or communities fear retaliation.", "Use split-blind review for high-risk claims, especially trafficking, organ harvesting, child abuse, disappearance, biological-terrorism allegations, sexual violence and elite-network allegations.", "Never publish protected identities, exact sensitive locations, raw private evidence or survivor details.", "Publish correction and right-of-reply routes on every adverse record.", "Escalate lawfully: courts, professional bodies, African mechanisms, UN Special Procedures, ICC pre-screen where jurisdiction fits, and press." ], "claim_classes": [ { "class": "established_public_fact", "meaning": "Supported by official records, court findings, admissions, audited reports or highly reliable public documentation." }, { "class": "public_allegation", "meaning": "Publicly reported allegation requiring verification, right of reply and source review." }, { "class": "unresolved_complaint", "meaning": "Complaint exists but was dismissed, delayed, suppressed or not independently investigated." }, { "class": "risk_hypothesis", "meaning": "Pattern-based risk logic derived from repeated conditions, incentives and historical precedent." }, { "class": "protected_review_only", "meaning": "Sensitive claim that should not be published in detail without legal/safety review." } ], "dataset_references": [ { "label": "UN OCHA Humanitarian Data Exchange (HDX)", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/", "note": "Public humanitarian datasets portal. PASO uses HDX as one evidence layer, not as the whole truth." }, { "label": "OCHA HDX overview", "url": "https://knowledge.base.unocha.org/wiki/spaces/imtoolbox/pages/227967035/Humanitarian+Data+Exchange+HDX", "note": "OCHA describes HDX as an open platform to make humanitarian data easy to find and use." }, { "label": "ACLED on HDX", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/organization/acled", "note": "ACLED event data on HDX can help map conflict and protest events, but PASO also requires testimony and protected review." }, { "label": "HDX conflict/violence topic datasets", "url": "https://data.humdata.org/dataset/?vocab_Topics=conflict-violence", "note": "Conflict/violence datasets are useful anchors, but curated data can undercount victims in access-restricted environments." } ], "source_origin_standard": { "principle": "The evidence value of an allegation depends partly on source origin and corroboration, not only repetition.", "highest_weight": [ "affected victims", "affected communities", "local independent witnesses", "court/legal records", "forensic records", "UN/independent investigations", "protected testimony reviewed safely" ], "medium_weight": [ "credible NGOs", "independent journalists", "academic fieldwork", "cross-checked open-source evidence" ], "low_weight_until_corrob": [ "hostile/rival-state media", "aligned think tanks", "anonymous claims", "accused-party statements", "strategic adversary claims" ], "rule": "Hostile media claims are investigation triggers, not final findings, unless corroborated." } }